Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T06:30:53.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The digestibility of the carbohydrate complex of barley, wheat and maize by adult fowls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. Bolton
W. Bolton
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Centre, West Mains Road, Edinburgh 9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The digestibility of the carbohydrates in barley, wheat and maize has been determined, using both conventional methods and individual methods for sugar, starch, pentosan, cellulose and lignin.

2. Sugar and starch were completely digested; cellulose and lignin were indigestible and the pentosan was about one-third digested.

3. Digestible pentosan accounted for about 3% of the total digestible carbohydrate.

4. The ratios of the available carbohydrate, i.e. the total of sugar plus starch expressed as starch, was almost exactly the same as that of the digestible carbohydrate and could be used as a measure of the relative amounts of digestible carbohydrate in the foods.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , June 1955 , pp. 119 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

A.O.A.C. (1950). Methods of Analysis. Published by A.O.A.C. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Bolton, W. (1954). Proc. World's Poult. Congr. 10: Edinburgh, p. 94.Google Scholar
Bolton, W. (1955). In the Press.Google Scholar
British Official Methods (1932). Fert. & Feeding Stuffs Regs. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ceampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). J. Nutr. 15, 383.Google Scholar
Davis, F. & Briggs, G. M. (1948 a). Poult. Sci. 27, 117.Google Scholar
Davis, F. & Briggs, G. M. (1948 b). Poult. Sci. 27, 658.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Emanuelson, H. & Fransson, A. (1949). K. Lantbrukshogscolans Ann. 16, 749.Google Scholar
Fraps, G. S. (1931). Bull. Texas Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 437.Google Scholar
Halnak, E. T. (1928). J. Agric. Sci. 18, 421.Google Scholar
Kaupp, B. F. & Ivey, J. E. (1922). Poult. Sci. 2, 1.Google Scholar
McCance, R. A., Widdowson, E. M. & Shackleton, L. R. B. (1936). Spec. Rep. Ser. Med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 213.Google Scholar
Norman, A. G. (1935). J. Agric. Sci. 25, 529.Google Scholar
Norman, A. G. & Jenkins, S. H. (1934). Biochem. J. 28, 2147.Google Scholar
Titus, H. W. (1939). Food and Life, U.S.D.A. Yearbook, p. 817.Google Scholar