Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:26:02.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What can the Public School do to Reduce Dropout Numbers?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

David L. Debertin
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
John M. Huie
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Get access

Extract

Rural youth who fail to complete high school often experience a great deal of difficulty when competing for available jobs. All rural youth cannot hope to find employment at satisfactory wage levels in the local community. Many must leave. It has long been known that economic mobility is highly related to the educational level of an individual. Dropping out of school at an early age poses a substantial deterrent to educational attainment and subsequent mobility.

It has been proposed that the number of dropouts can be reduced by pumping more money into the public schools. Educators have contended that inexperienced, poorly trained, and low-paid teachers often found in rural areas can lead to large numbers of dropouts. The analysis that follows was therefore designed to isolate determinants of dropout numbers from public schools. The model construes the formal educative process in a production function context as have other studies. Minimization of the number of dropouts is assumed to be one of the goals of the local school administrator. Hence, the dropout rate is one possible measure of an output. Inputs to the production process consist of characteristics of the school and community believed to have an influence on a student's decision whether or not to stay in school.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Purdue Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Paper No. 5622.

References

[1]Bieker, Richard F., and Anschel, Kurt R.. “Estimating Education Production Functions for Rural High Schools: Some Findings.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55:515519, Aug. 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Elchanon, Cohn. “Economics of Scale in Iowa High School Operation.” Journal of Human Resources, 3: 423434, Fall 1968.Google Scholar
[3]James, Coleman, et. al. “Equality of Educational Opportunity.” U.S. Office of Education, 1966.Google Scholar
[4]Debertin, David L.An Econometric Investigation of the Provision for Public Education in Indiana.” Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Purdue University, 1973.Google Scholar
[5]Debertin, David L.Cost-Size-Quality Relations Affecting North Dakota Schools.” Unpublished M.S. thesis, North Dakota State University, 1970.Google Scholar
[6]Christopher, Jencks, et. al. “Inequality, A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America.” New York: Basic Books, 1972.Google Scholar
[7]Kiesling, H.J.Measuring a Local Government Service, A Study of School Districts in New York State.Review of Economics and Statistics, 49:356376, Aug. 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Frederick, Mosteller and Moynihan, Daniel P., eds. On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Random House, 1972.Google Scholar
[9]Moynihan, Daniel P.Sources of Resistance to the Coleman Report.Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 2336, Winter 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]U.S. Bureau of the Census. “U.S. Census of Population.” 1970 General Social and Economic Characteristics Final Report, PC (1)-C16, Indiana, U.S. Gov't. Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1972.Google Scholar
[11]West, Gerry G., and Osburn, Donald D.. “Quality of Schooling in Rural Areas.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vo. 4, No. 1, pp. 8587, July 1972.Google Scholar
[12]Freddie C., WhiteA Quantitative Analysis of Factors Affecting Elementary and Secondary Schooling Quality with Economic Application for Rural Areas.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Oklahoma State University, 1972.Google Scholar