Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:08:54.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Value of Third-Party Certification of Preconditioning Claims at Iowa Feeder Cattle Auctions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Harun Bulut  and
John D. Lawrence
Harun Bulut
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at Iowa State University, Ames, IA
John D. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Get access

Abstract

After controlling a variety of feeder cattle characteristics and market and sale conditions in Iowa feeder auctions, the price premiums for preconditioning claims (vaccinations and minimum 30 days of weaning) with and without third-party certification (TPC) are estimated as $6.12/cwt and $3.35/cwt, respectively. These premiums differ statistically (p < 0.0001), and their difference exceeds the average participation cost of TPC ($l/cwt). This indicates that TPC is valued in the market to credibly signal preconditioning investment under asymmetric information.

Keywords

asymmetric informationfeeder cattle auctionsqualitysignallingthird-party certificationQUQ12Q13C23
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , December 2007 , pp. 625 - 640
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, D.W. “Pot-Bellies, Cattle Breeds and Revealing Signals.” Economic Inquiry 31,3(1993):481-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avent, R.K., Ward, C.E., and Lalman, D.L.. “Market Valuation of Preconditioning Feeder Calves.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36,1(2004):173-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busby, W.D., Strohbehn, D.R., Beedle, P., and Corah, L.R.. “Effect of Post-Weaning Health on Feedlot Performance and Quality Grade.” Animal Industry Report. Ames, IA: Iowa State University, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chymis, A.G., James, H.S., Konduru, S., and Pierce, V.L.. “Asymmetric Information in Cattle Auction: The Problem of Revaccinations.” Agricultural Economics 36(2007):79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corah, L.R., McCully, M., King, M., Salman, M., Seeger, J., and Grotelueschen, D.. “Effect of Value-Added Health Programs and Breed on Calf Prices: Superior Livestock Auction Analysis.” Abstract presentation at the 39th meeting of Midwestern Section of American Society of Animal Science, Des Moines, IA, 2006.Google Scholar
Dhuyvetter, K.C., and Schroeder, T.C. “Price-Weight Relationships for Feeder Cattle.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 48,3(2000):299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhuyvetter, K.C., Bryant, A.M., and Blasi, D.A.. “Case Study: Preconditioning Beef Calves: Are Expected Premiums Sufficient to Justify the Practice.” The Professional Animal Scientist 21(2005):502-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartwig, N.R., and Vermeer, E.. Preconditioning: An Iowa Success Story. December 2003. Internet site: http://www.iacattlemen.org/animalhealtharch.aspx (Accessed November 25, 2006).Google Scholar
Hueth, B., and Lawrence, J.D.. “Quality Management and Information Transmission in Cattle Markets: A Case Study of the Chariton Valley Beef Alliance.” Briefing paper 02-BP 40, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development. Ames, IA: Iowa State University, 2002.Google Scholar
King, M.E., and Seeger, J.T.. Nine-Year Trends at Superior Livestock Auction Confirm Higher Prices Go to Calves in Value-Added Health Programs. New York: Pfizer Animal Health Technical Bulletin SV-2004-02, 2004.Google Scholar
Lalman, D., and Smith, R.. “Effects of Preconditioning on Health, Performance and Prices of Weaned Calves.” Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet F-3529. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University, 2002.Google Scholar
Nyamusika, N., Spreen, T.H., Rae, O., and Moss, C.. “A Bioeconomic Analysis of Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex.” Review of Agricultural Economics 16(1994):39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, D., and Meyer, S.. “Cattle Price Seasonality.” Managing for Today’s Cattle Market and Beyond. Denver CO: Livestock Marketing Information Center, March 2002.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. SAS under Windows. Version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2003.Google Scholar
Ward, C., and Lalman, D.L.. “Price Premiums from a Certified Feeder Calf Preconditioning Program.” Paper presented at the NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management. St. Louis, MO, 2003.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J.M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar