Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:38:12.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State-Level Analysis of National Beef Policy: The Use of State Econometric Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Roland K. Roberts  and
William J. Martin
Roland K. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Hawaii Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Tennessee
William J. Martin
Affiliation:
Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Canberra, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Interest has grown in analyzing the impact of national imports of foreign beef on state agricultural sectors. In this study, an interfaced Hawaiian-national model is simulated for a change in national beef imports. Hawaiian and national impacts demonstrate wide variation in both sign and magnitude. Usefulness of state models is emphasized for situations where state impacts of national policies are of interest.

Keywords

beef importspolicyeconometric modelstate-national interface
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , December 1984 , pp. 63 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arzac, Enrique and Wilkinson, Maurice. “A Quarterly Econometric Model of the United States Livestock and Feed Grain Markets and Some of Its Policy Implications.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 61(1979):297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, Robert A. An Econometric Model of the United States Beef Market, Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Beef Research Report No. 20, Canberra, Australia, 1977.Google Scholar
Baum, Kenneth, Safyurtlu, Ali N., and Purcell, Wayne. “Analyzing the Economic Impact of National Beef Import Level Changes on the Virginia Beef and Pork Sectors.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 13(1981):111–118.Google Scholar
Betancourt, Roger and Kelejian, Harry. “Lagged Endogenous Variables and the Cochrane-Orcutt Procedure.” Econometrica, 49(1981):1073–1078.Google Scholar
California Federal-State Market News Service. Livestock and Meat Prices and Receipts at Certain California and Western Area Markets, Sacramento: California Department of Food and Agriculture, various issues 1977-1980.Google Scholar
Colyer, D. and Irwin, G. E. Beef, Pork, and Feed Grains in the Cornbelt: Supply Response and Resource Adjustments, University of Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin No. 921, 1967.Google Scholar
Crom, Richard. A Dynamic Price-Output Model of the Beef and Pork Sectors, U.S. Department of Agriculture, ERS Technical Bulletin No. 1426, 1970.Google Scholar
Dhrymes, P. J. Distributed Lags: Problems of Estimation and Formulation, San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1971.Google Scholar
Freebairn, J. W., and Rausser, Gordon C.. “Effects of Changes in the Level of U.S. Beef Imports.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 57(1975):676–688.Google Scholar
Garrod, Peter V. Interisland Ocean Freight Services in Hawaii, 1975, University of Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station, Department Paper No. 48, 1977.Google Scholar
Hawaii Agricultural Reporting Service. Statistics of Hawaiian Agriculture, Honolulu: Hawaii Department of Agriculture, various issues 1974-1980.Google Scholar
Hawaii Market News Service. Honolulu Prices: Wholesale Eggs, Poultry, Pork, Beef and Rice, Honolulu: Hawaii Department of Agriculture, various issues 1974-1980.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. Econometric Methods, 2nd edition, New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1972.Google Scholar
Kmenta, Jan. Elements of Econometrics, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1971.Google Scholar
Knapp, John L., Fields, T. Windsor, and Jerome, Robert T. Jr.. A Survey of State and Regional Econometric Models, Charlotte, Virginia:Tayloe Murphy Institute, 1978.Google Scholar
Martin, William J. and Heady, Earl O.. “A Quarterly Model of the U.S. Livestock-Feed Subsector and Some of Its Dynamic Multipliers.” CARD Report No. 127T, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, 1984.Google Scholar
Matson Navigation Company. Tariffs 14-B through 14-G, 1970-1981.Google Scholar
Nerlove, Marc. “Distributed Lags and the Estimation of Long-Run Supply and Demand Elasticities. Theoretical Considerations.”J. Farm Econ., 40(1958):301–311.Google Scholar
Pub, L. 96-177 (December 31, 1979), Meat Import Act of 1979. 93 STAT. 1291.Google Scholar
Reeves, G. W.“Price Stabilization, Bilateral Trade and Institutional Constraints: The Case of Beef in Australia and the United States.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis, 1979.Google Scholar
Roberts, Roland K., Vieth, Gary R., and Nolan, James C. Jr., “An Analysis of the Impact of Energy Price Escalations During the 1970's on Hawaii Beef Production and Prices.” W. J. Agr Econ., 9(July, 1984):91–106.Google Scholar
Ryan, T. J.“A Note of Bias in the Estimated Effects of Beef Imports on U.S. Beef Prices.” Aust. J. Agr. Econ, 24(1980):60–64.Google Scholar
Schermerhorn, Richard W., Garrod, Peter V., and Ching, Chauncey T. K. A Description of the Market Organization of the Hawaii Beef Cattle Industry, Hawaii Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, Information Text Series No. 11, 1982.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. An Assessment of the United States Meat Import Act of 1979, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Economic Information Report No. 152, 1981.Google Scholar
University of Hawaii Cooperative Extension Service. The Livestock Industry in Hawaii, College of Tropical Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication No. 67, 1970.Google Scholar
White, K. J.“A General Computer Program for Econometric Methods - SHAZAM.” Econometrica, 46(1978):239–240.Google Scholar
Yanagida, John F. and Conway, Roger K.. Annual Livestock Model of the United States, U.S. Department of Agriculture, NED Staff Report, 1980.Google Scholar