No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Relevancy of the Social Sciences in the Policy Arena: Implications for Agricultural Economics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2016
Extract
For decades this society has underinvested in the social sciences relative to the biological and physical sciences. In partial consequence, today the changing agenda of problems of the society falls increasingly into the domain of the social sciences. Ironically the cumulative effect of this underinvestment is now creating a unique window of opportunity for the social sciences.
- Type
- Invited Papers and Discussions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1989
References
Barkley, P. “Social Science Issues in Agriculture and Rural Communities.” Paper presented to the NCT 146 Workshop on Social Science Research in the Agricultural Experiment Stations. Arlington, VA, January 25-27, 1988.Google Scholar
Bonnen, J.T. “Agriculture in the Information Age.” Keynote address to the Agricultural Institute of Canada, Saskatoon, Canada, July 7,1986. Michigan State University Agricultural Economics Staff Paper No. 86-78, 1986b.Google Scholar
Bonnen, J.T. “A Century of Science in Agriculture: Lessons for Science Policy.” Amer. J. Agri. Econ., 68, 5 (1986a):1065–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnen, J.T. “U.S. Agricultural.Development: Transforming Human Capital, Technology and Institutions.” U. S.-Mexico Relations: Agricultural and Rural Development. Ed. Johnston, Bruce F., Luiselli, Cassio, Conteras, Celso Cartas, and Norton, Roger D.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1987. pp. 267–300.Google Scholar
Bromley, D.W.
Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Browne, W.P., and Bonnen, J.T.. “Why is Agricultural Policy So Difficult to Reform?” The Political Economy of Agriculture. 1989 Annual Policy Review of the National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1989.Google Scholar
Cairncross, A. “Economics in Theory and Practice.” Amer. Econ. Review, 75, 2 (1985):1–14.Google Scholar
Dillman, D.A. “The Social Impacts of Information Technologies in Rural North America.” Rural Sociology, 50, 1 (1985):1–26.Google Scholar
Johnson, G.L. “Theoretical Considerations.” The Overproduction Trap in U.S. Agriculture. Ed. Johnson, Glenn L. and Quance, Leroy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972. pp. 22–40.Google Scholar
Johnston, B.F., and Clark, W.C.. Redesigning Rural Development: A Strategic Perspective. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.H. “The Economics Profession and Making of Public Policy.” Journal of Economic Literature, 25, 1 (1987):49–91.Google Scholar
“New Economists: The Cambridge Tendency.” The Economist, 309 (December 24, 1988):91–94.Google Scholar
North, D.C. “Institutions, Transaction Costs and Economic Growth.” Economic Inquiry, 25, 3 (1987):419–428.Google Scholar
O'Hare, W.P.
The Rise of Poverty in Rural America. Population Trends and Public Policy Paper No. 15, Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, 1988.Google Scholar
Porter, K.H., and Greenstein, R.. “Misperceptions of the Rural Poor and Implications for Welfare Policy.” Paper presented to Congressional Research Service-Joint Economic Committe Symposium on “Toward Rural Development Policy for the 1990s,” Washington, DC, September 29-30, 1988.Google Scholar
Ruttan, V.W. “Social Science Knowledge and Institutional Change.” Amer. J. Agri. Econ., 66, 5 (1984):549–559.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E.
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press, 1985.Google Scholar