Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T16:51:10.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Potential For High-Value Agricultural Products Under The North American Free Trade Agreement: The Case of Beef in Mexico and Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Okwudili O. Onianwa
Okwudili O. Onianwa*
Affiliation:
Alabama A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The prospects for U.S. beef products in the advent of a North American Free Trade Agreement were examined using a system-wide approach to import allocation. Results indicate that increases in the standard of living in Mexico and Canada would stimulate increased importation of processed and unprocessed beef products. Bulk beef product in both countries had expenditure elasticities greater than one, while semi-processed and highly processed beef products had expenditure elasticities of less than one.

Keywords

bulkhigh-valuehighly processedimport shareNAFTAsemi-processed
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , December 1995 , pp. 377 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, J., Carter, C., Green, R., and Pick, D.. “Whither Armington Trade Models?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:2(1990): 445-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armington, P. “A Theory of Demand For Products Distinguished by Place of Production.” Staff Paper 16. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, 1969.Google Scholar
Blanciforti, L., and Green, R.. “The Almost Ideal Demand System: A Comparison and Application to Food Groups.” Agricultural Economics Research 35(1983): 1–10.Google Scholar
Capps, O. Jr., R., Kirby, and Williams, G.. “A comparison of Demand For Meat Products in the Pacific Rim Region.” Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, May, 1993.Google Scholar
Clements, K., and Selvanathan, E.. “The Rotterdam Demand Model and Its Application in Marketing.” The Institute of Management Sciences and Operations Research Society of America Marketing Science 7 No 1, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coats, R. Jr. “The North American Free Trade Agreement Benefits For U.S. Agriculture.” Agricultural Public Affairs Policy and Economic Issues, University of Arkansas, Cooperative Extension Service Vol. 4 No 2, 1993.Google Scholar
Curry, K., and Henneberry, D.. “Agricultural Import Growth Markets: An Aggregate Study With a Comparison of European Community Members and Non-Members.” Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Division of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, Oklahoma State University, Jan., 1993.Google Scholar
Disney, W. “Potential Influence of a NAFTA on the Southern Beef Cattle Sector.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Tulsa, OK. 1993.Google Scholar
Economic Research Service. “Agriculture in a North American Free Trade Agreement: Analysis of Liberalizing Trade Between the United States and Mexico.” USDA Washington, DC, 1991.Google Scholar
Economic Research Service. “High-Value Agricultural Exports: U. S. Opportunities in the 1980's.” USDA Washington, DC, 1983.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund. International Financial Statistics Year Book, April, 1993.Google Scholar
Kennedy, T., Borst, A., and Spatz, K.. “Cooperatives Ponder Impact, Opportunities in North American Free Trade Agreement.” Farmer Cooperatives. ACS, March, 1993.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Henneberry, D., and Pyles, D.. “An Analysis of Value- Added Agricultural Exports to Middle-Income Developing Countries: The Case of Wheat and Beef Products.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics Dec, 1991.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Seale, J. Jr, Jierwiriyapant, P.. “Do Trade Agreements Help U.S. Exports? A Study of the Japanese Citrus\nA\xstxy. “Agribusiness Journal” 6, No.5, 1990.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madigan, E. “Statement, USDA, North American Free Trade Agreement: Agriculture” USDA, FAS, Washington, DC, 1992.Google Scholar
Rosson, III.E., Davis, A., Angel, A., and Segarra, E.. “Free Trade Impacts on US-Mexican Meat Trade.” Agribusiness an International Journal. Vol. 9, No 2 (1993): 159-73.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schluter, G., and Clayton, K.. “Expanding The Processed Product Share of U.S. Agricultural Exports.” National Economics Division. ERS Staff Report NO AGESS810701.Google Scholar
Schluter, G., and Edmondson, W.. “Exporting Processed Instead of Raw Agricultural Products.” Agriculture and Rural Economy Division, ERS 1989.Google Scholar
Sparks, A., Seale, J. Jr, Buxton, B.. “Apple Import Demand: Four Markets For U.S. Fresh Apples.” Commodity Economic Development, ERS Report No 641.Google Scholar
Theil, H. “The System-Wide Approach to Microeconomics.” University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Agriculture in the North American Free Trade Agreement. Analysis of Liberalizing Trade Between the United States and Mexico.” ERS, FAE Report No 246, 1992.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, “World Agricultural Trends and Indicators” 1970-1989.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Services, Foreign Agricultural Service of the United States. Washington, DC, Various issues.Google Scholar
Young, L. “Canadian Meat Demand” Ottawa Agriculture Canada, Public Branch, Working Paper No 10. June, 1987.Google Scholar