Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:53:51.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Opportunities in Farm Management: Discussion/Challenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Gregory D. Hanson*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University
Get access

Extract

The role of cognitive science as presented by Black offers an in-depth treatment of the current agricultural information processing and interpretation revolution and the contributions of other disciplines, ranging from engineering and psychology, finance and medicine, to the science of decisionmaking in agriculture. Certainly, many farm management economists will find the issues of information reception, styles of thinking, systems science approaches, biological pathways in modeling, psychological types, and other cognitive science issues raised in this session to be important and useful in the context of both basic and applied research. Agricultural economists are again reminded of the need to integrate approaches across models, the payoff to alternative degrees of approximating reality and the usefulness of a better balance in the portfolio of microcomputer activities.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Statistics. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1962.Google Scholar
Antle, John M.Incorporating Risk in Production Analysis.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Purdue Univ., August 1-4, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, K. L. and Barton, G.. “Farm Cost Structure and Opportunities for Cost Reduction.J. Farm Econ., 36(1954):991999.Google Scholar
Baum, Kenneth H. and Schertz, Lyle P.. Modeling Farm Decisions for Policy Analysis. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1983.Google Scholar
Black, Roy. “Opportunities in Farm Management in the 1980s.” Invited paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Nashville, Tennessee, February 5-8, 1984.Google Scholar
Castle, Emory N.The Economics of Agriculture and Agricultural Economics.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 59(1977):824833.Google Scholar
Chavas, J. P. and Kliebenstein, J. B.. “Toward a Dynamic Model of Swine Production Decisions.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of American Agricultural Economics Association, Purdue Univ., Aug. 2, 1983.Google Scholar
Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.Policy Considerations in Farm Management Research in the Decade Ahead.J Farm Econ., 38(1956):13011311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, Willard W.Agricultural Economics at the University of Minnesota 1886-1979”Inst, of Agr., Forestry and Home Econ., Dept. of Agr. and App. Econ., Ag. Exp. Sta., Miscellaneous Publication 21, 1983.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Willard W. and Ryan, Mary E.. American Farm Policy, 1948-1973, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1976.Google Scholar
Eddleman, B. R.Opportunities to Redirect Research Resources in Agricultural Economics From Low Priority Activities.” A discussion statement prepared for the organized symposium on “Priorities for Work in Agricultural Economics in the 1980's at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Utah State University, August, 1982.Google Scholar
Eddleman, B. R. and Purcell, Joseph C.. “Food and Agriculture in the 1980's: The Implied Research Priorities.So. J. Agr. Econ., 12(1980):5963.Google Scholar
Ewing, John A.The Role of Agricultural Economics in a Changing Environment.So. J. Agr. Econ., 7(1975):17.Google Scholar
Hanson, Gregory D. and Eidman, Vernon R.. “Farm Size Evaluation in the El Paso Valley. Comment.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 65(1983):340343.Google Scholar
Hildreth, R. J.Unique Opportunities for Work in Agricultural Economics.“A discussion opener for an organized symposium on ”Priorities for Work in Agricultural Economics in the 1980's at the American Agricultural Economics Association Meeting, Utah State University, August, 1982.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. L.Stress on Production Economies.Australian J. Agr. Econ., 7(1963):1227.Google Scholar
Lacewell, Ronald D. and McGrann, James M.. “Research and Extension Issues in Production Economies.So. J. Agr. Econ., 14(1982):6574.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. “Academic Economies.Science, Vol. 217, July 9, 1982.Google Scholar
Moscardi, Edgardo and Janvry, Alain de. “Attitudes Toward Risk Among Peasants.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 59(1977):710716.Google Scholar
Mosher, M. L.Thirty Years of Farm Financial and Production Records in Illinois.J. Farm Econ., 27:2437, Feb. 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaxico, J. and Weigmann, G.. “Allocation of Resources in Farm Management and Production Economics Research.J. Farm Econ., 39(1957):8693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, Robert W.Discussion: Agricultural Economics: A Critical Review of the State of the Science.So. J. Agr. Econ., 10(1978):4346.Google Scholar
Ruttan, V.Issues in the Evolution of Production Economics.J. Farm Econ., 49(1967):14901499.Google Scholar
Schertz, Lyle P.Agricultural Economics 1950-2000.So. J. Agr. Econ., 7(1975):913.Google Scholar
Schultz, T.W.Issues in the Evolution of Production Economics.J. Farm Econ., 49(1967):14901499.Google Scholar
Sutton, John D.Data Needs and Collection Methods for Analysis of Agricultural Production Potential.NRED, ERS, USDA, Staff Rep. AGES 82047, May 1982.Google Scholar
Tweeten, Luther. “Discussion: A Look at Major Events and Policy Issues Facing Southern Agriculture.So. J. Agr. Econ. 11 (1979):1114.Google Scholar