Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:25:52.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Market-Based Solutions to Environmental Problems: Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Richard T. Woodward
Richard T. Woodward*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Get access

Abstract

There is rapidly growing interest in the use of market-based (MB) instruments in environmental policy. The papers in this session discuss three relatively new areas for such policies: groundwater contamination, nonpoint source surface-water pollution and carbon sequestration. The papers point out the potential for MB policies in these areas, but significant challenges remain. This comment highlights challenges related to five issues: monitoring and enforcement, trading ratios, baselines, transaction costs, and risk and uncertainty. All these issues must be addressed before MB policies can take the full step from economic theory to regulatory reality.

Keywords

global warmingcarbon sequestrationgroundwater contaminationnonpoint pollutioneffluent tradingtradable emissions permitsQ2Q28Q25
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , August 2000 , pp. 259 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apogee Research, Inc. Incentive Analysis for Clean Water Act Reauthorization: Point Source/Non-point Source Trading for Nutrient Discharge Reductions. Report for the U.S.E.P.A., Office of Water and Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation. 1992.Google Scholar
Atkinson, S. and Tietenberg, T.. “Market Failure in Incentive Based Regulation: The Case of Emissions Trading.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21 (July 1991):17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, B.A. “The Effects of Uncertainty on Optimal Nitrogen Applications.” Review of Agricultural Economics 14(July 1992):271–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M.A. “An Innovative Approach to Nutrient Management.” Paper presented at the National Association of Regional Councils, Charlotte, N.C. June 10, 1997.Google Scholar
Kearney, Inc. Framework for Incorporating Flexible, Market-Based Incentives into Geographic Targeting of Nitrogen Reduction Actions for Long Island Sound. Report Submitted to Elizabeth Van Rabenswaay, Regional Project Officer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2. New York, New York. August 27, 1996.Google Scholar
Malik, A.S., Letson, D. and Crutchfield, S.R.. “Point/Nonpoint Source Trading of Pollution Abatement: Choosing the Right Trading Ratio.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(November 1993):959–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, J.P. “Marketable Pollution Permits with Uncertainty and Transaction Costs.” Resource and Energy Economics 20(March 1998):27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, K., Oates, W.E. and Portney, RR.. “Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(Fall 1995):119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M.E. and van der Linde, C.. “Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(Fall 1995):97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shortle, J.S., Horan, R.D. and Abler, D.G.. “Research Issues in Nonpoint Pollution Control.” Environmental and Resource Economics 11 (April 1998):571–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavins, R.N. “Transaction Costs and Tradeable Permits.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29(September 1995):133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar