Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:56:21.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incorporating Environmentally Compliant Manure Nutrient Disposal Costs into Least-Cost Livestock Ration Formulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Joleen C. Hadrich
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Christopher A. Wolf
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
J. Roy Black
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Stephen B. Harsh
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Get access

Abstract

Livestock rations are formulated to minimize feed cost subject to nutritional requirements for a target performance level, which ignores the potentially substantial cost of disposing of nutrients fed in excess of nutritional requirements. We incorporate nutrient disposal costs into a modified least-cost ration formulation model to arrive at a joint least-cost decision that minimizes the sum of feed and net nutrient disposal costs. The method is demonstrated with phosphorus disposal costs on a representative dairy farm. Herd size, land availability and proximity, crop rotation, and initial soil phosphorus content are shown to be important in determining phosphorus disposal costs.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, J.R., and Hlubik, J.Basics of Computerized Linear Programs for Ration Formulation.” Journal of Dairy Science 63(1980):1366–78.Google Scholar
Boland, M.A., Preckel, P.V., and Foster, K.A.Economic Analysis of Phosphorus-Reducing Technologies in Pork Production.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 23(1998):468–82.Google Scholar
Bosch, D.J., Zhu, M., and Kornegay, E.T.Economic Returns from Reducing Poultry Litter Phosphorus with Microbial Phytase.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 29(1997):255–66.Google Scholar
Cerosaletti, P.E., Fox, D.G., and Chase, L.E.Phosphorus Reduction through Precision Feeding of Dairy Cattle.” Journal of Dairy Science 87(2004):2314–23.Google Scholar
Coffey, B.An Analysis of the Effects of Feed Ingredient Price Risk on the Minimum Cost Background Ration.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33(2001):353–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dou, Z., Ferguson, J.D., Fiorini, J., Toth, J.D., Alexander, S.M., Chase, L.E., Ryan, C.M., Knowlton, K.F., Kohn, R.A., Peterson, A.B., Sims, J.T., and Wu, Z.Phosphorus Feeding Levels and Critical Control Points on Dairy Farms.” Journal of Dairy Science 86(2003):3787–95.Google Scholar
Feinerman, E., Bosch, D.J., and Pease, J.W.Manure Applications and Nutrient Standards.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(2004):1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, R.A., Babcock, B.A., and Wang, E.The Economics of Swine Manure Storage and Management.” Review of Agricultural Economics 20(1998):96113.Google Scholar
France, J., and Thornley, J.H.M. Mathematical Models in Agriculture. London: Butterworths, 1984.Google Scholar
Harrigan, T.M.Manure Hauling Rate of Spreader Tank Systems.” Applied Engineering in Agriculture 13(1997):465–72.Google Scholar
Harrigan, T.M. Manure Transport Rates and Land Application Costs for Tank Spreader Systems. MSU Extension Bulletin E–2767, November 2001.Google Scholar
Jean dit Bailleul, P., Rivest, J., Debeau, F., and Pomar, C.Reducing Nitrogen Excretion in Pigs by Modifying the Traditional Least-Cost Formulation Algorithm.” Livestock Production Science 72(2001):199201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keplinger, K.O., and Hauck, L.M.The Economics of Manure Utilization: Model and Application.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 31(2006):414–40.Google Scholar
Knowlton, K.F., Radcliffe, J.S., Novak, C.L., and Emmerson, D.A.Animal Management to Reduce Phosphorus Losses to the Environment.” Journal of Animal Science 82(E Suppl. 2004):E173E195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lara, P., and C Romero. “An Interactive Multi-Goal Programming Model for Determining Livestock Rations: An Application to Dairy Cows in Andalusia, Spain.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 43(1992):945–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livestock Marketing Information Center (LMIC). Internet site: http://www.lmic.info/ (Accessed February 15, 2006).Google Scholar
Michigan Department of Agriculture. Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices for Manure Management and Utilization. Lansing: Michigan Commission of Agriculture, June 2006.Google Scholar
Michigan State University Extension, Manure and Nutrient Management, Internet site: http://www.msue.msu.edu/portal/msue_url_frame.cfm?pageset_id=212421&page_id=212423&target_url=http://web2.msue.msu.edu/manure/ (Accessed May 19, 2006).Google Scholar
Midwest Plan Service. “Manure Characteristics.” Manure Management Systems Series. MWPS-18, Section 1, 2001.Google Scholar
Morse, D., Head, H.H., Wilcox, C.J., Van-Horn, H.H., Hissem, C.D. Jr, and Harris, B.Effects of Concentration of Dietary Phosphorus on Amount and Route of Excretion.” Journal of Dairy Science 75(1992):3039–49.Google Scholar
Myers, Z.H.Estimation of Inevitable Phosphorus Losses and Predicting Phosphorus Excretion of Dairy Cattle Fed a Range of Dietary Phosphorus Concentrations.” 2003. M.S. thesis. Michigan State University.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science, 2001.Google Scholar
Pomar, C., Debeau, F., Letourneau-Montminy, M.P., Boucher, C., and Julien, P.O.Reducing Phosphorus Concentration in Pig Diets by Adding an Environmental Objective to the Traditional Feed Formulation Algorithm.” Livestock Science. 2006. DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2006.11.011.Google Scholar
Rausch, J.Estimating Ownership and Operating Costs for Manure Applicators.” Presented at 2006 Great Lakes Manure Handling Expo, Fowler, MI, July 27, 2006. Internet site: http://www.msue.msu.edu/portal/default.cfm7pageset_id=212421&page_id=344459&msue_portal_id=25643 (Accessed July 31, 2006).Google Scholar
Romero, C., and Rehman, T. Multiple Criteria Analysis for Agricultural Decisions. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., 2003.Google Scholar
Rotz, C.A., Sharpley, A.N., Satter, L.D., Gburek, W.J., and Sanderson, M.A.Production and Feeding Strategies for Phosphorus Management on Dairy Farms.” Journal of Dairy Science 85(2002):3142–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spears, R.A., Young, A.J., and Kohn, R.A.Whole-Farm Phosphorus Balance on Western Dairy Farms.” Journal of Dairy Science 86(2003):688–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stokes, J.R., and Tozer, P.R.Cost Minimization and Managing Soil Nutrient Loading: Conflict or Compromise?Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(2002):151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toor, G.S., Sims, J. Thomas, and Dou, Z.Reducing Phosphorus in Dairy Diets Improves Farm Nutrient Balances and Decreases the Risk of Nonpoint Pollution of Surface and Ground Waters.” Agricultural Ecosystems & Environment 105(2005):401–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tozer, P.R.Least-Cost Ration Formulations for Holstein Dairy Heifers by Using Linear and Stochastic Programming.” Journal of Dairy Science 83(2000):443–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandehaar, M.J., Bucholtz, H., Kriegel, R.D., Beede, D., and Black, J.R. Spartan Dairy Ration Evaluator/Balancer 3. East Lansing: Michigan State University, 2007.Google Scholar
Warncke, D., Dahl, J., Jacobs, L., and Laboski, C. Nutrient Recommendations for Field Crops in Michigan. MSU Extension Bulletin E–2904, May 2004.Google Scholar
Wittenberg, E., and Wolf, C.A.2004 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary.” MSU Department of Agricultural Economics Staff Paper 2005-10, September 2005.Google Scholar
Wolf, C.A., Hadrich, J.C., Mahnken, C., and Harsh, S.B.The Structure and Competitiveness of Michigan Dairy Farm Industry: Summary and Analysis of the 2005 Michigan State University Survey.” Ag Econ Report 633, August 2007.Google Scholar
Wu, Z., Satter, L.D., and Sojo, R.Milk Production, Reproductive Performance, and Fecal Excretion of Phosphorus by Dairy Cows Fed Three Amounts of Phosphorus.” Journal of Dairy Science 83(2000):1028–41.Google Scholar