Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:34:24.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Reverse Osmosis on Southeast Milk Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

William A. Schiek  and
Emerson M. Babb
William A. Schiek
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Emerson M. Babb
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Get access

Abstract

The Southeast is a net importer of milk and milk products. Milk must be imported from other regions at certain times of the year. Reverse osmosis (RO) is a new processing technology which could significantly reduce milk transportation costs between regions by removing half the water from raw milk prior to shipment. A network flow algorithm, which incorporates federal milk orders and solves for the least cost procurement pattern, was used to assess the impact of RO on southeast milk marketing orders under alternative raw product pricing scenarios.

Keywords

milkreverse osmosisfederal milk ordersnetwork flow algorithm
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , December 1989 , pp. 63 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babb, E.M. Banker, D.E., Goldman, D., Martella, D.R., and Pratt, J.E.. Economic Model of Federal Milk Marketing Order Policy Simulator. Indiana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 158, Purdue University, Apr. 1977.Google Scholar
Bradley, G.H. Brown, G.G., and Graves, G.W.. “Design and Implementation of Large Scale Primal Transshipment Algorithms.” Management Science. 24(1977):1–34.Google Scholar
Fleming, A. “A Spatial Economic Analysis of the Impact of Reverse Osmosis Filtration on the Grade A Milk Market.” M.S. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1987.Google Scholar
Hammond, J.W. Buxton, B.W., and Thraen, C.S.. Potential Impacts of Reconstituted Milk in Regional Prices, Utilization and Production. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 529, University of Minnesota, 1979.Google Scholar
McDowell, H. Fleming, A.M., and Fallert, R.F.. Federal Milk Marketing Orders: An Analysis of Alternative Policies. Commodity Economics Division, ERS, USDA, Ag. Econ. Report No. 598, September 1988.Google Scholar
Novakovic, A.M. Babb, E.M., Martella, D.R., and Pratt, J.E.. An Economic and Mathematic Description of the Dairy Market Policy Simulator. Dept. Agr. Econ. Report A.E. Res. 80-21, Cornell University, Sept. 1980.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. Technology, Public Policy and the Changing Structure of American Agriculture. Washington D.C. OTA-F-285, March 1986.Google Scholar
Schiek, W.A. “The Impact of Reverse Osmosis on Florida Milk Supplies.” Master' Thesis, Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, 1988.Google Scholar
Schiek, W.A. and Babb, E.M.. “Impact of Reverse Osmosis on Florida Milk Markets.” Staff Paper No. 364, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, July 1989.Google Scholar
Stabile, R.L. “Economics of Reverse Osmosis and Multistage Evaporation for Concentrating Skim Milk from 8.8 to 45% Solid.” J. Dairy Science, 66(1983):1765–1771.Google Scholar
Whipple, G.D. “An Analysis of Reconstituted Fluid Milk Pricing Policy.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 65(1983): 207–213.Google Scholar
Winchell, E.H. and Hammond, J.W.. An Analysis of the Marketing Cost Impacts of Reverse Osmosis Concentration of Milk. Dept. Agr. Econ. Report ER 84-1, University of Minnesota, Jan. 1984.Google Scholar