Skip to main content Accessibility help

Impact of Reducing Federal Order Class I Differential on Representative Texas and New Mexico Dairy Farms

  • Joe L. Outlaw (a1), Ronald D. Knutson (a1), Robert B. Schwart (a1), John Holt (a1), James W. Richardson (a1) and Dalton H. Garis (a2)...


The General Accounting Office (GAO) recommended that the USDA substantially reduce or eliminate the extent of price discrimination practiced under federal milk marketing orders. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impacts of alternative means of implementing the GAO proposal on the economic viability of Texas and New Mexico dairy farms. Five dairy farms were simulated for six years under the current dairy policy and five alternative proposals. Results of the analyses indicate that large New Mexico dairies can remain economically viable under all of the alternatives. On the other hand, federal order policy changes would accelerate the loss of equity for moderate size Texas dairy farms.



Hide All
Babb, E. M. Future of Dairy Marteting Orders, Food and Resource Economics Department, Staff Report 363, University of Florida, July 1989.
Buxton, B. M., McGuckin, T., Selley, R., and Willett, G.. Milk Production: A Four-State Earnings Comparison. Washington D.C.: USDA, ERS, Ag. Econ. Rep. No. 528, February 1985.
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute. FAPRI July 1990 Forecast: Macro, Prices Paid Indices and Cost of Production. Iowa State University and University of Missouri-Columbia, Staff Report, July 1990.
Garis, D. H.Economic Impacts of Removing the Distance Differential on Texas Dairy Farms.” M.S. thesis. Texas A&M University, 1989.
McDowell, H., Fleming, A. M., and Fallert, R. F.. Federal Milk Marketing Orders: An Analysis of Alternative Policies, Washington D.C.: USDA, ERS, Ag. Econ.Rep. No. 598, September 1988.
Pratt, J., Keniston, M. and Novakovic, A.. Geographic Price Relationships in the U.S. Fluid Milk Industry: A Mathematical Programming Analysis. Cornell Ag. Econ. Staff Paper No. 89-16, May 1989.
Richardson, J. W., and Nixon, C. J.. Description of FLIPSIM V: A General Firm Level Policy Simulation Model. Texas Ag. Exp. Sta. Bull., B-1528, Texas A&M University, 1986.
Schwart, R. B.Texas Moves Ahead in Dairying”, Hoard's Dairyman, Vol. 133, No. 12, July 1988.
Seton, N. J.Future Growth In the Texas Dairy Industry.” M.S. thesis, Texas A&M University, May 1986.
Texas Milk Market Order Administrator. Texas Milk Market Report. Texas Milk Marketing Order, Federal Order 126, Vol. 55, No. 6, June, 1989.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Dairy: Situation and Outlook Report. Washington D.C.: USDA, ERS, DS-424, April 1990.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Costs of Production — Livestock and Dairy, 1989. Washington D.C.: USDA, ERS, ECIFS 9-1, August 1990.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Federal Milk Order Market Statistics: Annual Summary. Washington D.C.: Agricultural Marketing Service, various issues 1980-89.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). Milk Marketing Orders: Options for Change. Washington D.C.: GAO/RCED, 88-9, March 1988.
Yonkers, R. D.Impacts of Exogenously-Determined Variables on Dairy Farms: A Simulation Modeling Approach.” Ph.D. thesis. Texas A&M University, 1989.



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed