Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Factor Price Disparity and Retained Ownership of Feeder Cattle: An Application of Feedlot and Carcass Performance Data to Farm-Level Decision Making

  • Brad J. White (a1), John D. Anderson (a2), W. Blair McKinley (a3) and Jane Parish (a4)

Abstract

In this study, we used farm-level data from a university feed-out program to evaluate how the value of feeder cattle ultimately realized through finishing and grid pricing differs from their market value at public auction. Consistent with the theory of factor price disparity, results indicate that significant risk premiums exist in the feeder cattle market. Producers of cattle with known feedlot performance, carcass potential, or both might be better off retaining ownership of their calves or marketing them in a way that communicates the information that is known about their potential performance directly to the buyer.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Anderson, J.D., and Zeuli, K.A.. “The Revenue Risk of Value-based Pricing for Fed Cattle: A Simulation of Grid vs. Average Pricing.International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 4(2001):275–86.
Cross, H.R., and Savell, J.W.. “What Do We Need for a Value-based Beef Marketing System.Meat Science 36(1994):1927.
Fausti, S.W., and Feuz, D.M.. “Production Uncertainty and Factor Price Disparity in the Slaughter Cattle Market: Theory and Evidence.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995):533–40.
Fausti, S.W., Feuz, D.M., and Wagner, J.J.. “Value Based Marketing for Fed Cattle: A Discussion of the Issues.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 1(1998):7390.
Fausti, S.W., Johnson, B., Epperson, W., and Grathwohl, N.. “Risk and Economic Incentive to Retain Ownership of Steer Calves.” Economics Staff Paper 2003-6, Dept. of Economics, South Dakota State University, Brookings, 2003.
Feuz, D.M.Economic Implications of Show List, Pen Level, and Individual Animal Pricing.” Formula Pricing and Grid Pricing Fed Cattle: Implications for Price Discovery and Variability, Ward, C.E., Feuz, D.M. and Schroeder, T.C., eds. Blacksburg, Virginia: Research Institute on Livestock Pricing, Virginia Tech University, 1999.
Feuz, D.M., Fausti, S.W., and Wagner, J.J.. “An Analysis of the Efficiency of Four Marketing Methods for Slaughter Cattle.Agribusiness 9(1993):453–63.
Feuz, D.M., “Risk and Market Participant Behavior in the U. S. Slaughter-Cattle Market.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 20(1995):2231.
Gebremeskel, T., and Shumway, C.R.. “Farm Planning and Calf Marketing Strategies for Risk Management: An Application of Linear Programming and Statistical Decision Theory.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(1979):363–70.
Horowitz, I.Decision Making and Theory of the Firm. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston Publishing, 1970.
Lambert, D.K.Calf Retention and Production Decisions over Time.Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 14(1989):919.
Livestock Marketing Information Center. Livestock Marketing Information Center. Internet site: http://lmic.info/ (Accessed March 2, 2005).
Mintert, J.Beef Feedlot Industry.Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 19(2003):387–95.
National Cattlemen's Association. “The War on Fat!” Final report of the Value-Based Marketing Task Force. Englewood, Colorado: National Cattlemen's Association, 1990.
Rodriguez, A., and Taylor, R.G.. “Stochastic Modeling of Short-term Cattle Operations.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(1988):121–32.
Savell, J.W., and Cross, H.R.. “Value Based Marketing: Current Status.” Proceedings of the Annual Reciprocal Meat Conference of the American Meat Science Association, 1991, pp. 117–20.
Schroeder, T.C., and Graff, J.L.. “Estimated Value of Increased Pricing Accuracy for Fed Cattle.Review of Agricultural Economics 22(2000):89101.
Schroeder, T.C, Ward, C.E., Lawrence, J., and Feuz, D.M.. Fed Cattle Marketing Trends and Concerns: Cattle Feeder Survey Results. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, MF-2561, 2002.
USDA-AMS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service). “National Weekly Direct Slaughter Cattle Report—Formulated and Forward Contract.” St. Joseph, MO: LM_CT151, various dates, 2005a.
USDA-AMS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service). “National Weekly Direct Slaughter Cattle Report—Prior Week Slaughter and Contract Purchases.” St. Joseph, MO: LM_CT153, various dates, 2005b.
USDA-AMS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service). “National Weekly Direct Slaughter Cattle Report—Negotiated Purchases.” St. Joseph, MO: LM_CT154, various dates, 2005c.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. National Income and Product Accounts Interactive Tables. Internet site: http://www.bea.gov/bea/dn/nipaweb/index.asp (Accessed August 3, 2006).
Ward, C.E., Schroeder, T.C., Wheeler, T.L., Mintert, J., and Drouillard, J.S.. “Merits of Value Discovery Alternatives for Fed Cattle and Carcasses.” Paper presented at the Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, July 11-15, 2003.
Whitson, R.E., Barry, P.J., and Lacewell, R.D.. “Vertical Integration for Risk Management: An Application to a Cattle Ranch.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 8(1976):4550.

Keywords

Factor Price Disparity and Retained Ownership of Feeder Cattle: An Application of Feedlot and Carcass Performance Data to Farm-Level Decision Making

  • Brad J. White (a1), John D. Anderson (a2), W. Blair McKinley (a3) and Jane Parish (a4)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed