Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:29:08.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Union Import Demand for In-Shell Peanuts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Tullaya Boonsaeng ,
Stanley M. Fletcher  and
Carlos E. Carpio
Tullaya Boonsaeng
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Applied Economics at University of Georgia, Griffin, GA
Stanley M. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Applied Economics at University of Georgia, Griffin, GA
Carlos E. Carpio
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics and Statistics at Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Get access

Abstract

This paper analyzes the European Union (EU) import demand for in-shell peanuts from three sources: the United States, China, and the rest of the world. We find that peanuts from different sources are differentiated by EU consumers. The expenditure elasticity is elastic for U.S. in-shell peanuts, which is associated with their higher quality. The conditional own price elasticities are more elastic for U.S. and Chinese in-shell peanuts. These findings have at least two implications. First, U.S. producers and exporters should direct efforts to ensure that in-shell peanuts exported to the EU are of the best possible quality, and, second, promotion efforts should stress the quality of U.S peanuts as an advertising tool.

Keywords

European Union import demandin-shell peanutsnonlinear SAIDSD12Q11Q17
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , December 2008 , pp. 941 - 951
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Peanut Council. Peanut Taste and Freshness Are Key. Internet site: http://www.peanutsusa.org.uk/Europe/index.cfm?fuseaction=newsrelease.home (Accessed February 28, 2008).Google Scholar
Andayani, S.R.M., and Tilley, D.S. “Demand and Competition among Supply Sources: The Indonesian Fruit Import Market.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 29(December 1997):279-89.Google Scholar
Berndt, E.R., and Savin, E.N. “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Singular Equation Systems with Autoregressive Disturbances.” Econometrica 43(September-November 1975):937-58.Google Scholar
Blackorby, C., and Russell, R.R. “Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up—A Comparison of the Allen-Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities.” The American Economic Review 79(September 1989):882-88.Google Scholar
Bliss, R.M. “Taste Tests Prove it; U.S. Peanuts are Tops.” USDA Agricultural Research Magazine August 2005.Google Scholar
Blundell, R., and Robin, J.M. “Latent Separability: Grouping Goods without Weak Separability.” Econometrica 68(January 2000):53–84.Google Scholar
Borges, R.B. “Trade and the Political Economy of Agricultural Policy: The Case of the United States Peanut Program.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(December 1995): 595–612.Google Scholar
Borges, R.B., and Thurman, W.N. “Marketing Quotas and Random Yields: Marginal Effects of Inframarginal Subsidies on Peanut Supply.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(November 1994):809-17.Google Scholar
Burton, M., and Young, T. “The Impact of BSE on the Demand for Beef and Other Meats in Great Britain.” Applied Economics 28(June 1996):687-93.Google Scholar
Buse, A. “Evaluating the Linearized Almost Ideal Demand System.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(November 1994):781-93.Google Scholar
Carew, R., Florkowski, W.J., and He, S. “Demand for Domestic and Imported Table Wine in British Columbia: A Source-Differentiated Almost Ideal Demand System Approach.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 52(July 2004): 183-99.Google Scholar
Carpio, C.E., Wohlgenant, M.K., and Safley, C.D. “A Structural Econometric Model of Joint Consumption of Goods and Recreational Time: An Application to Pick-Your-Own Fruit.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(August 2008):644–657.Google Scholar
Chen, K.Z. “The Symmetric Problem in the Linear Almost Ideal Demand System.” Economics Letters 59(June 1998):309-15.Google Scholar
Deaton, A., and Muellbauer, J. “An Almost Ideal System.” The American Economic Review 70(June 1980):312-26.Google Scholar
European Commission. EUROSTAT. Internet site: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/newxtweb/ (Accessed December 2006).Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. Internet site: http://faostat.fao.org/site/535/default.aspx#ancor (Accessed April 2007).Google Scholar
Goncalves, S., and White, H. “Bootstrap Standard Error Estimates for Linear Regression.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 100(September 2005):970-79.Google Scholar
Green, R., Hahn., W., and Rocke, D. “Standard Errors for Elasticities: A Comparison of Bootstrap and Asymptotic Standard Errors.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 5(January 1987): 145-49.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Educ. Inc., 2003.Google Scholar
Hardie, W., Horowitz., J., and Kreiss, J.P. “Bootstrap Methods for Time Series.” International Statistical Review 71(August 2003)435–59.Google Scholar
Hayes, D.J., Wahl, T.I., and Williams, G.W. “Testing Restrictions on a Model of Japanese Meat Demand.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(August 1990):556-66.Google Scholar
Henneberry, S.R., and Hwang, S.H. “Meat Demand in South Korea: An Application of the Restricted Source-Differentiated Almost Ideal Demand System Model.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39(April 2007)47–60.Google Scholar
Li, H., and Maddala, G.S. “Bootstrap Variance Estimation of Nonlinear Functions of Parameters: An Application to Long-Run Elasticities of Energy Demand.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (November 1999):728-33.Google Scholar
McGuirk, A., Driscoll., P., Alwang., J., and Huang, H. “System Misspecification Testing and Structural Change in the Demand for Meats.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 20(1995):1–21.Google Scholar
Miller, B.R., and Mabbs-Zero, C. “Estimates of Government Intervention Levels in U.S. Peanut Markets.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 24(July 1992): 153-62.Google Scholar
Moschini, G. “Units of Measurement and the Stone Index in Demand System Estimation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(February 1995):63–68.Google Scholar
Piggott, N.E., Chalfant, J.A., Alston, J.M., and Griffith, G.R. “Demand Response to Advertising in the Australian Meat Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(May 1996): 268-79.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T.G., and Seale, J.L. “Import Demand for Disaggregated Fresh Fruits in Japan.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34(December 2002):585–602.Google Scholar
Shukur, G. “Dynamic Specification and Misspecification in Systems of Demand Equations: A Test Strategy for Model Selection.” Applied Economics 34(April 2002):709-25.Google Scholar
Tomek, W.G., and Robinson, K.L. Agricultural Product Prices. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Services (FAS). Production, Supply and Distribution (PSD online). Internet site: http://www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdQuery.aspx (Accessed April 2007).Google Scholar
Yang, S.R., and Koo, W.W. “Japanese Meat Import Demand Estimation with the Source-Differentiated AIDS Model.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19(December 1994):396–408.Google Scholar
Zhang, P., Fletcher, S.M., and Carley, D.H. “Japan's Peanut Import Demand: Implications for United States Exports.” Agricultural Economics 11(September 1994):51–59.Google Scholar