Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Estimating Effects of Agricultural Research and Extension Expenditures on Productivity: A Translog Production Function Approach

  • Syu-Jyun Larry Lyu (a1), Fred C. White (a1) and Yao-Chi Lu (a2)

Abstract

The effects of agricultural research and extension expenditures on productivity in the United States are estimated during the period 1949-81 using data for ten production regions. The large time-series cross-sectional data base allows the translog production function to be estimated directly. Results from the translog and Cobb-Douglas production functions are compared. The results indicate that use of the Cobb-Douglas production function would overestimate the internal rate of return of agricultural research and extension expenditures in the United States and eight production regions. The total marginal product and internal rate of return for the United States are $8.11 and 66 percent, respectively.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Berndt, E. R., and Christensen, L. R.The Translog Function and the Substitution of Equipment Structures, and Labor in United States Manufacturing 1929-1968.J of Econometrics, 1(1973):81113.
Blackorby, C, Primont, D., and Russell, R. R.On Testing Separability Restrictions with Flexible Functional Forms.J. of Econometrics, 5(1977):195209.
Bredahl, M. and Peterson, W.. “The Productivity and Allocation of Research: United States Agricultural Experiment Stations.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58(1976):684692.
Budget of the United States Government. Washington, D.C., Annual Issues, 1936-1972.
Christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. W., and Lau, L. J.Conjugate Duality and the Transcendental Logarithmic Production Function (Abstract).Econometrica 39(1971):255256.
Christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. W., and Lau, L.J.. “Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers.The Rev. of Econ. and Stat. 5(1973):2845.
Cline, Philip Lee. “Sources of Productivity Change in United States Agriculture.” Ph.D. Dissertation; Oklahoma State University; May, 1975.
Evenson, Robert E.The Contributions of Agricultural Research and Extension to Agricultural Productivity.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, 1968.
Fuss, M., McFadden, D., and Mundlak, Y.. “A Survey of Functional Forms in the Economic Analysis of Production.Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, Vol. 1, eds. Fuss, M. and McFadden, D., North-Holland Publishing Co., 1978.
Griliches, Zvi. “Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function.Amer. Econ. Rev., 54(1964):96l974.
Guilkey, D. K. and Lovell, C. A. K.. “On the Flexibility of the Translog Approximation.International Econ. Rev., 21 (1980):137147.
Lu, Yao-Chi, Cline, Philip, and Quance, Leroy. Prospects for Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report No. 435, ESCS, United States Dept. of Agriculture, September 1979.
McFadden, D. L.Further Results on C.E.S. Production Functions.The Rev. of Econ. Studies, 30(1963):7383.
Norton, G. W., and Davis, J. S.Evaluating Returns to Agricultural Research: A Review.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 63(1981):685699.
Peterson, Willis, and Hayami, Yujiro. “Technical Change in Agriculture.A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Vol. 1, Martin, (Ed.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977.
Ray, Subhash C.A Translog Cost Function Analysis of United States Agriculture, 1939-77.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 64(1982):490498.
Ruttan, V. W.Bureaucratic Productivity: The Case of Agricultural Research.Public Choice, 35(1980):529547. Also reprinted by Economic Development Center, Department of Economics and Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, UMEDC 823.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., Annual Issues, 1950-1982.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research Service. Funds for Research at State Agricultural Experiment Stations and Other State Institutions. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, Annual Issues, 1965-1981.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research Service. Inventory of Agricultural Research. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, Annual Issues, 1972-1981.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector. Washington, D.C., February 1981 and previous issues.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Farm Income Statistics. Washington, D.C., July 1978 and previous issues.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Farm Real Estate Market Developments. Washington, D.C., July 1981 and previous issues.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Extension Service. Annual Report of Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, Annual Issues, 1930-1956.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Business Economics. Survey of Current Business. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, Annual Issues.
U.S. Department of Treasury, Bureau of Accounts. Combined Statement of Receipts, Expenditures, and Balances of the United States Government. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, Annual Issues.
Vincent, D. P.Factor Substitution in Australian Agriculture.Australian J. Ag. Econ., 21(1977):119129.
Wales, T. J.On the Flexibility of Flexible Functional Forms: An Empirical Approach.J. of Econometrics, 5(1977):183193.
White, F. C., and Havlicek, J. Jr.. “Optimal Expenditures for Agricultural Research and Extension: Implications of Underfunding.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 64(1982):4755.

Keywords

Estimating Effects of Agricultural Research and Extension Expenditures on Productivity: A Translog Production Function Approach

  • Syu-Jyun Larry Lyu (a1), Fred C. White (a1) and Yao-Chi Lu (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed