Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T02:17:22.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Sectoral and Economy-Wide Policies on Tobacco Production in the Dominican Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Pedro Pablo Peña
Affiliation:
Fundacion de Desarrollo Agropecuario, Santo Domingo, The Dominican, department of agricultural economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0401
George W. Norton
Affiliation:
Fundacion de Desarrollo Agropecuario, Santo Domingo, The Dominican, department of agricultural economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0401

Abstract

This study analyses the effects of specific agricultural and exchange rate policies on tobacco production in the Dominican Republic. Direct protection resulting from output and input subsidies and taxes was positive on average from 1966 to 1988, but total protection was negative when exchange rate policies are considered. Tobacco policies were quite volatile and resulted in increasing production in the 1970s but decreasing production in the 1980s. Overall, tobacco production was 4.8 percent less than it would have been had there been no policy interventions. Several reasons are provided for the policies.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, Robert H.Governments and Agricultural Markets in Africa” in The Role of Markets in the World Food Economy, eds. Gale, D. Johnson and Edward, G. Schuh (Boulder: Westview Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Ballenger, Nicole, Dunmore, John, and Lederer, Thomas, “Trade Liberalization in World Markets,“Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 516, Washington D.C, USDA, ERS, May 1987.Google Scholar
Bautista, Andres, “Algunas Consideraciones Sobre la Situación Tabacalera Nacional,” INTABACO, Santiago, Dominican Republic, 1985.Google Scholar
Centro Dominicano de Promoción de Exportaciones, “Analisis del Incentivo Cambiario en la Producción y Exportación del Tobaco en Rama en la República Dominicana,” CEDOPEX, Santo Domingo, 1983.Google Scholar
Greene, Duty D., and Roe, Terry L., “Trade, Exchange Rate, and Agricultural Pricing Policies in the Dominican Republic,” The World Bank, Washington, D.C, 1989.Google Scholar
Henneberry, Sheila, and Henneberry, David, “International Trade Policy,” in Agricultural Policy Analysis Tools for Economic Development, ed. Tweeten, L.. (Boulder: Westview Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O. Exchange Rate Determination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O., Schiff, Maurice, and Valdes, Alberto, “Agricultural Incentives in Developing Countries: Measuring the Effect of Sectoral and Economy-Wide Policies,The World Bank Economic Review 3(1988):255271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peña, Pedro P.The Effects of Tobacco Policies in the Dominican Republic”, M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1991.Google Scholar
Pompelli, Gregory K. and Pick, Daniel, “Pass-through of Exchange Rates and Tariffs in Brazil - U.S. Tobacco Trade,” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 72(1990): 676681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar