Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:17:05.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: The Distribution of the Costs and Benefits of Public Schooling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

H. Evan Drummond
H. Evan Drummond*
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access

Extract

David Holland has provided a basic contribution to the expanding literature concerned with the distributional effects of expenditures on education. He has ventured into the relatively untouched realm of measuring the distrubutional impact of tax costs and expenditure benefits of public elementary, secondary and higher education. Our fundamental ignorance of the equity issues involved in public education, coupled with the economic and social importance of its eventual product, provide ample justification for continued research in this field.

Even though a valuable literature review occupies a significant proportion of Holland's paper, I will limit my comments to that portion of the paper that is original. Reviewing briefly, Holland's goal is to determine the distribution by income class of net benefits resulting from education. To do this, he compares the average per family tax costs for the provision of education with the average per family expenditures made. The difference between the two is the net subsidy received. Holland's basic conclusion is that the net subsidies from lower (as opposed to higher) education are regressive.

Type
Discussion
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , July 1973 , pp. 81 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Becker, Gary S., Human Capital, Columbia University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
[2]Bowles, Samuel and Levin, Henry M., “The Determinants of Scholastic Achievement-An Appraisal of Some Recent Evidence” Journal of Human Resources, Winter, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Coleman, James S., et. al., Equality of Educational Opportunity, U.S. Office of Education, 1966.Google Scholar
[4]Denison, Edward F., The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternatives Before Us, Committee for Economic Development, 1962.Google Scholar
[5]Hansen, W. Lee, and Weisbrod, Burton A., “The Distribution of Costs and Benefits of Public Higher Education: The Case of California,” Journal of Human Resources, Spring, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Hartman, Robert W., “A Comment on the Pechman-Hansen Weisbrod Controversy,” Journal of Human Resources, Fall, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Innes, Jon T., Jacobson, Paul B. and Pellegrin, Rolan J., The Economic Returns to Education: A Survey of the Findings, University of Oregon, 1965.Google Scholar
[8]Musgtave, Richard A., The Theory of Public Finance, McGraw-Hill, 1959.Google Scholar
[9]Schultz, Theodore W., The Economic Value of Education, Columbia University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
[10]Schultz, Theodore W., “The Rate of Return in Allocating Investment Resources to Education,” Journal of Human Resources, Summer, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Weisbrod, Burton A., External Benefits of Public Education, An Economic Analysis, Princeton University, Industrial Relations Section, 1964.Google Scholar