Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:57:47.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Competitive Position of Southern Commodities: Some Trends and Underlying Forces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Daniel A. Sumner
Daniel A. Sumner*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, North Carolina State University
Get access

Extract

My assignment is to ask what has been happening to the position of southern agriculture in national and world markets, and why. I do not have to answer the whole “why” question because the part of the answer relating to marketing institutions and policy is being handled by the other panelists. But I am sure you will agree that even the left-over bits are more than can be treated—at least by me—in a single paper.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , July 1986 , pp. 49 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, Julian M. The Effects of the European Community's Common Agricultural Policy in the International Markets for Poultry Meats. North Carolina State University, North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Bulletin No. 471; March, 1985.Google Scholar
Chacholiades, Miltiades. The Pure Theory of International Trade, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, 1973.Google Scholar
Deardorff, Alan V. “The General Validity of the Law of Comparative Advantage.” J. Political Econ., 88,5(1980):941–957.Google Scholar
Jabara, Cathy L. and Thompson, Roben L.. “Agricultural Comparative Advantage Under International Price Uncertainty: The Case of Senegal.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 62,2(1980): 188–198.Google Scholar
McElroy, Robert G. and Gustafson, Cole. Costs of Producing Major Crops, 1975-1981. USDA, National Economics Division, Economic Research Service Staff Report No. AGES 850329. Washington, D.C., April 1985.Google Scholar
Paarlberg, Philip L., Webb, Alan J., Dunmore, John C., and Deaton, J. Larry. “The U. S. Comparative Position in World Commodity Trade.” Agricultural-Food Policy Review: Commodity Program Perspectives. USDA, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report No. 530, Washington, DC, July 1985.Google Scholar
Pasour, E. C Jr.. “Cost of Production: A Defensible Basis for Agricultural Price Supports?” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 62,2(1980):244–248.Google Scholar
Pearson, Scott R. and Meyer, Roanld K.. “Comparative Advantage Among African Coffee Producers.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 56,2(1974):310–313.Google Scholar
Speaking of Trade: Its Effect on Agriculture. University of Minnesota Agricultural Extension Service, Special Report No. 72; National Public Policy Education Committee Publication No. 6, November, 1978.Google Scholar
Sumner, Daniel A. and Alston, Julian M.. Effects of the Tobacco Program: An Analysis of Deregulation. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Occasional Paper. Washington, D. C, 1984.Google Scholar
Tweeten, Luther. “Impact of Domestic Policy on Comparative Advantage of Agriculture in the South.” Oklahoma State University; Paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association meeting, Orlando, Florida, February 2-5, 1986.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (a). Agricultural Statistics., various issues.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (b). Background for 1985 Farm Legislation: Cotton., Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 476.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (c). Background for 1985 Farm Legislation: Peanuts., Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 469.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (d). Background for 1985 Farm Legislation: Soybeans., Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 472.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (e). Background for 1985 Farm Legislation: Wheat., Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 467.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (f). Economie Indicators of the Farm Sector: State Income and Balance Sheet Statistics, 1982., Washington, D. C..Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (g). Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: State Income and Balance Sheet Statistics, 1983., Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (h). Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Production and Efficiency Statistics, 1983., Washington, D. C; February, 1985.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (i). Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Costs of Production, 1984., ECIFS 4-1, Washington, D. C; September, 1985.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (j). Farm Income Situation. 1953, 1963, 1973.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (k). Foreign Agricultural Service. Foreign Agricultural Circular, FG-26, 1983.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (I). Outlook and Situation Report: Cotton and Wool. CWS-44 and CWS-43.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (m). Outlook and Situation Report: Oil Crops. OCS-4.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (n). Outlook and Situation Report: Rice. RS-46.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (o). Outlook and Situation Report: Tobacco. TS-193Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, (p). U. S. Fats and Oils Statistics, 1950-1971. Statistical Bulletin No. 489.Google Scholar