Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T04:37:00.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Examination of Trends in Geographic Concentration in U.S. Hog Production, 1974–96

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Bryan J. Hubbell  and
Rick Welsh
Bryan J. Hubbell
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia
Rick Welsh
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia
Get access

Abstract

Geographic concentration in U.S. hog production from 1974-96 is investigated using a measure based on Theil's entropy index. For the U.S. as a whole, geographic concentration is occurring at a slow rate, both for hog farms and hog numbers. However, for particular states, primarily in the new Southern Atlantic production region, concentration is high and increasing at a rapid pace. Concentration was increasing for the 23-year period for 16 out of the 20 states in the analysis. Results indicate that geographic concentration by augmentation is occurring to the greatest degree in Arkansas, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania.

Keywords

entropygeographic concentrationhog production
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , December 1998 , pp. 285 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdalla, C.W., Lanyon, L.E., and Hallberg, M.C.. “What We Know About Historical Trends in Firm Location Decisions and Regional Shifts: Policy Issues for an Industrializing Animal Sector.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 77(1995):1229-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, P.D. “Measures of Inequality.” Amer. Sociological Rev. 43(1978):865-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkema, A. “Reaching Consumers in the Twenty-First Century: The Short Way Around the Barn.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 75(1993):1126-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehlje, M. “Vertical Coordination and Structural Change in the Pork Industry: Discussion.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 77(1995):1225-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, D. “Multiple Measurements of U.S. Income Inequality.” Rev. Econ. and Statis. 70(1988):398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, M.A. “Studies on Hog Odor Impacts Provide Contradictory Results.” Iowa State University Extension News, Col. No. 306, 28 October 1996.Google Scholar
Hamilton, N.D. “State Regulation of Agricultural Production Contracts.” University of Memphis Law Rev. 25(1995):1051–1106.Google Scholar
Kliebenstein, J., and Lawrence, J.D.. “Contracting and Vertical Coordination in the U.S. Pork Industry.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 77(1995):1213-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letson, D., and Gollehon, N.. “Confined Animal Production and the Manure Problem.” Choices 11(3rd Quarter 1996):18–24.Google Scholar
Levy, A., and Chowdhury, K.. “A Geographical Decomposition of Intercounty Income Inequality.” Compar. Econ. Stud. 37(1995):1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marbery, S. “Hog Industry Insider.” Feedstuffs 69,8(1997):26.Google Scholar
Martin, L.L., and Zering, K.D.. “Relationships Between Industrialized Agriculture and Environmental Consequences: The Case of Vertical Coordination in Broilers and Hogs.” J. Agr. and Appl. Econ. 29(1997):45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. “Contracting: A Permanent Fixture in the Industry.” Pork '92, December 1992.Google Scholar
O'Brien, P. “Implications for Public Policy.” In Food and Agricultural Markets: The Quiet Revolution, eds., Shertz, L. and Daft, L., pp. 296–318. Washington DC: National Planning Association, 1994.Google Scholar
O'Neill, P.B. “Concentration Trends and Profitability in U.S. Manufacturing: A Further Comment and Some New (and Improved) Evidence.” Appl. Econ. 25(1993):1285-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano, A.P., and Abdalla, C.W.. “Clustering in Animal Agriculture: Economic Trends and Policy.” In Balancing Animal Production and the Environment, pp. 192-99. Proceedings of the Great Plains Animal Agriculture Task Force Conference, Denver CO, October 1994.Google Scholar
Palmquist, R.B., Roka, F.M., and Vukina, T.. “Hog Operations, Environmental Effects, and Residential Property Values.” Land Econ. 73(1997):114-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, V.J. “The Industrialization of Hog Production.” Rev. Agr. Econ. 17(1995):107-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royer, J.S., and Frederick, A.L.. “1-300 Gets Thumbs Up from Majority of Nebraska Farmers in Recent Survey.” Nebraska Farmer (August 1994):13.Google Scholar
Shelbume, R.C., and Bednarzik, R.W.. “Geographic Concentration of Trade-Sensitive Employment.” Monthly Labor Rev. 116(1993):3–13.Google Scholar
Southard, L., and Reed, S.. “Rapid Changes in the U.S. Pork Industry.” Agricultural Outlook (March 1995):11–14.Google Scholar
Sporleder, T.L. “Entropy Measures of Spatial Concentration in Poultry Processing.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 6(1974):133-37.Google Scholar
Stith, P., and Warrick, J.. “Boss Hog 2: Corporate Takeovers.” Raleigh [North Carolina] News and Observer (21 February 1995).Google Scholar
Taff, S.J., Tiffany, D.G., and Weisberg, S.. “Measured Effects of Feedlots on Residential Property Values in Minnesota: A Report to die Legislature.” Staff Pap. No. P96-12, Dept. of Appl. Econ., University of Minnesota, July 1996.Google Scholar
Theil, H.Economics and Information Theory. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. “Livestock County Data.” Online. Available HTTP: http://mann77.mannlib.cornell.edu/data-sets/livestock.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. “Agricultural Economics and Land Ownership Survey.” 1987 Census of Agriculture. USDC/Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census, Washington DC, 1988.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Census of Agriculture. Census years 1982 and 1992. USDC/Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census, Washington DC, 1983, 1993.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office. Animal Agriculture: Information on Waste Management and Water Quality Issues. Washington DC, 1995.Google Scholar
Welsh, R. “The Industrial Reorganization of U.S. Agriculture: An Overview and Background Report.” Rep. No. 6, Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture Policy Studies, Greenbelt MD, April 1996.Google Scholar
Welsh, R. “Reorganizing U.S. Agriculture: The Rise of Industrial Agriculture and Direct Marketing.” Rep. No. 7, Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture Policy Studies, Greenbelt MD, August 1997.Google Scholar
Wikle, T. “Geographical Patterns of Membership in U.S. Environmental Organizations.” Professional Geographer 47(1995):41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar