Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

An Evaluation of Cost of Production Information Usage by County Agents

  • DeeVon Bailey (a1), Douglas W. Eck (a1) and Terrence F. Glover (a1)

Abstract

County agents receive cost of production information primarily from state extension services and then disseminate it to agricultural producers. A survey gathered data on agent usage of this information. A Poisson regression analysis using count data was performed to determine the factors influencing the number of times county agents directly referred to published cost of production (enterprise budget) information in a year. The agent's understanding of budget information use in management decisions, the availability of budgets, and his/her receiving the budgets in multiple forms (e.g., sheets, booklets, or software) had significant positive impacts on the use of budgets by the agent.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Agresti, A. Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1984.
Boehlje, M.D. and Eidman, V.R.. Farm Management. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1983.
Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K.. “Econometric Models Based on County Data: Comparisons and Applications of Some Estimators.J. Applied Econometrics, 1 (1986): 2954.
Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K.. ”Regression-Based Tests for Overdispersion in the Poisson Model.J. Econometrics, 46(1990): 347363.
County Agents Directory. Niles, Illinois: Century Communications Inc., 1988.
Eck, Douglas W.A National Survey of Enterprise Budget Development and Use by the Extension Service.” M.S. thesis. Utah State University. Logan, Utah, 1990.
Hausman, J., Hall, B.H., and Greliches, Z.. “Econometric Models of Count Data with an Application to the Patents - R & D Relationship.Econometrica, 52(1984): 909938.
Kay, R.D. Farm Management Planning, Control, and Implementation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986.
Kinnear, Thomas C. and Taylor, James R.. Marketing Research: An Applied Approach New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
Klonsky, Karen.A National Survey of Enterprise Budget Development Methods.” Paper presented at the USDA ERS Conference on Economic Accounting for Commodity Costs and Returns. Kansas City, Missouri, February 20, 1991.
McElroy, R.G.Costs of Production.” Vol. 12, Major Statistical Series of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, DC: USDA ERS, Agricultural Handbook No. 671. September 1987.
Morehart, Mitchell, Johnson, James and Shapouri, Hosein. “The National Commodity Cost and Return Estimates.” Paper presented at the USDA ERS Conference on Economic Accounting for Commodity Costs and Returns. Kansas City, Missouri. February 20, 1991.
Maddala, G.S. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
Olson, K.D., McGrann, J.M., and Nelson, T.R.. Using and Understanding Budgeting and the Microcomputer Budget Management System. Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M, 1985.
Edward, Rister M., Smith, Edward G., Richardson, James W., Knutson, Ronald D., Grant, Warren R., and Thompson, Troy N.. Texas Rice Production Costs. Agricultural and Food Policy Center Working Paper 89–8. Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, November 1989.
Stigler, George J. The Theory of Price, 4th edition. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, 1987.
Stigler, George J. The Organization of Industry. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1970.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. Washington D.C., 1988.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Agricultural Census. Issues for various states, 1989.

Keywords

An Evaluation of Cost of Production Information Usage by County Agents

  • DeeVon Bailey (a1), Douglas W. Eck (a1) and Terrence F. Glover (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed