Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Acreage Response Under Farm Programs for Major Southeastern Field Crops

  • Patricia A. Duffy (a1), Kasazi Shalishali (a2) and Henry W. Kinnucan (a1)

Abstract

An expected utility model that includes output price and yield uncertainty was used to estimate cotton, com, and soybean acreage response equations for the Southeast. The model appeared to fit the soybean and corn data well, resulting in own-price elasticity estimates of 0.317 for com and 0.727 for soybeans. When applied to cotton acreage, however, the model did not yield satisfactory results. When elasticity was allowed to change over time, however, statistical results for the cotton equation improved, yielding an own-price elasticity of 0.915 at data means.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Bailey, K.W., and Womack, A.W.. “Wheat Acreage Response: A Regional Econometric Investigation.S. J. Agr. Econ. 17,2 (1985): 171–80.
Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E., Welsch, R.E.. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: Wiley, 1980.
Chavas, J.P.Constrained Choices Under Risk.S. Econ. J. 53(1987):662–76.
Chavas, J.P., and Holt, M.T.. “Acreage Decisions Under Risk: The Case of Corn and Soybeans.Amer. J. of Agr. Econ. 72, 3 (1990): 529–38.
Duffy, P., Wolhgenant, M.K., and Richardson, J.W.. “Regional Cotton Acreage Response.S. J. of Agr. Econ. 19,2 (1987): 99108.
Gallagher, P. and Green, R.G.. A Cropland Use Model: Theory and Suggestions for Estimating Planted Acreage Response. NED, ERS, USDA. ERS Staff Report No. AGES 840410, November, 1984.
Glesjer, H.A New Test for Heteroscedasticity.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 64 (1969): 316–23
Greene, W.H.Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. 1990.
Houck, J.P., and Subotnik, A.. “The U.S. Supply of Soybeans: Regional Acreage Functions.Agr. Econ. Research. 21 (1969): 99108.
Johnson, N.L. and Kotz, S.. Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1972.
Lee, D.R. and Helmberger, P.. “Estimating Supply Response in the Presence of Farm Programs.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 67, 2 (1985): 193202.
Madadala, G.S.Methods of Estimation for Models of Markets with Bounded Price Variation.Int. Econ. Rev. 24 (1983): 361–87.
Mims, A.M., Duffy, P.A., and Young, G.. “Effects of Alternative Acreage Restriction Provisions on Alabama Cotton Farms.S. J. of Agr. Econ. 21, 2 (1989): 85:94.
Morzuch, B.J., Weaver, R.D., and Helmberger, P.G.. “Wheat Acreage Supply Response under Changing Farm Programs.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 62, 1 (1980): 2937.
Romain, R.F.A Commodity Specific Model for U.S. Agriculture.” College Station, Texas: Ph.D. Dissertation. Texas A&M University. December, 1980.
Sandmo, A.On the Theory of the Competitive Firm Under Price Uncertainty.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 61 (1971): 6573.
Singh, B., Nagar, A.L., Choudry, N.K., and Ray, B.. “On the Estimation of Structural Change: A Generalization of the Random Coefficient Model.International Econ. Rev. 17(1976):340–61.
Shumway, C.R.Supply, Demand, and Technology in a Multiproduct Industry: Texas Field Crops.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 65 (1983):748–60.
Stone, R.Model for Demand Projections. University of Cambridge Reprint Series, No. 236. Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, 1965.
Taylor, C. R.A Description of Agsim. an Econometric-Simulation Model of Regional Crop and National Livestock Production in the United States. Auburn University, Dept. of Agr. Econ. and Rur. Soc., Series, ES89-1, January, 1989.
Tomek, W.G. and Robinson, K.L.. “Agricultural Price Analysis and Outlook.” In A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature. Volume 1. Martin, Lee R. (ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. 1960-1988
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. “Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector, Income and Balance Sheet Statistic,” Various Issues.

Keywords

Acreage Response Under Farm Programs for Major Southeastern Field Crops

  • Patricia A. Duffy (a1), Kasazi Shalishali (a2) and Henry W. Kinnucan (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed