Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T03:27:26.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Static Analysis of Oklahoma's Vegetable Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Shida Rastegari Henneberry ,
Raymond Joe Schatzer  and
Yousif El Beheisi
Shida Rastegari Henneberry
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University
Raymond Joe Schatzer
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University
Yousif El Beheisi
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The impact of hypothetical changes in yields, costs, and demand that might result from the organization of Oklahoma vegetable growers into cooperatives or other multifarmer marketing associations is estimated using a sector programming model. A comparative static analysis is used to evaluate the impact of these changes on planted acreage, growers' revenues, and consumers' and producers' surplus. The results of this analysis indicate that changes in demand are most effective in increasing revenues for Oklahoma growers.

Keywords

comparative static analysisOklahoma vegetable cropsproduce cooperative associationsector programming model
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , July 1996 , pp. 159 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Epperson, J. E., Tyan, H. L., and Huang, C. L.. “Applications of Demand Relations in the Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Industry” J. Food Distribution Res. 12(February 1981): 135–42.Google Scholar
Hazell, P. B. R., and Norton, R. D.. Mathematical Programming for Economical Analysis in Agriculture. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., 1986.Google Scholar
Henneberry, S. R., and Kang, T.. “Potential Markets for Oklahoma Produce: A Market Window Analysis” J. Food Distribution Res. 23(September 1992):29–46.Google Scholar
Henneberry, S. R., and Willoughby, C.. “Marketing Inefficiencies in Oklahoma's Produce Industry: Grower and Buyer Perceptions” J. Food Distribution Res. 20(September 1989):97–109.Google Scholar
Huang, K. S. “U.S. Demand for Food: A Complete System of Price and Income Effects.” Tech. Bull. No. 1714, USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington DC, December 1985.Google Scholar
Rhodes, V. J. The Agricultural Marketing System, 4th ed. Scottsdale AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick, Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
Schatzer, R. J., and Motes, J. E.. “Selected Individual Budgets for Cabbage, Cucumbers, Green Peppers, Muskmelons, Squash, Sweet Corn, and Tomatoes.” In Enterprise Budgets for Oklahoma Crops and Livestock, ed., Jobes, R.. Oklahoma Coop. Ext. Ser., Dept. of Agr. Econ., Oklahoma State University, 1989.Google Scholar
Schatzer, R. J., Wickwire, M., and Tilley, D.. “Supplemental Vegetable Enterprises for Cow-Calf and Grain Farmers in Southeastern Oklahoma.” Res. Rep. No. T-874, Agr. Exp. Sta., Dept. of Agr. Econ., Oklahoma State University, 1986.Google Scholar
Stoecker, A., and Li, E.. “Linear Programming Applications to Economic Development and Policy Analysis: Lecture Notes and Course Materials.” Dept. of Agr. Econ., Oklahoma State University, 1988.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. “Food Consumption, Prices, and Expenditures: 1962–1982.” Statis. Bull. No. 702, USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington DC, December 1983.Google Scholar