Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T01:30:06.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agro-Ethics: Extension, Research, and Teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Glenn L. Johnson
Glenn L. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Student unrest and the dissatisfaction of activists with the performance of “the establishment” shook our society to its roots in the late 1960s and early 1970s, as underlying values and accepted concepts of right and wrong were criticized. Agriculture did not escape and is still widely criticized. Agro-ethics was born. Phrases sufficient to indicate the extent of the current concern about agro-ethics include: animal rights, environmental ethics, recombinant DNA, hard tomatoes/hard times, the export of our soil, energy ethics, Nestle and the multi-nationals, feeding the world's hungry, the plight of the small farm, helping the poorest of the poor, farmer-adapted technology, small is beautiful, and who controls U.S. agriculture.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , July 1982 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achinstein, P. and Barker, S. F. (eds.) The Legacy of Logical Positivism. The Johns Hopkins Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, Edgar. Jurisprudence: The Philosophy and Method of the Law. Harvard University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Friedman, M.Essays in Positive Economics. The University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. E. “Performance Evaluation of Academic Research.” Science 206(1979).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, G. L. “The Quest for Relevance in Agricultural Economics.” Amer. J. Agr. Eton. 53 (1971):728–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. L. “Philosophic Foundations: Problems, Knowledge and Solutions.” European Rev. Agr. Econ. 3(1976a): 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. L. “Who is a Peer?” Amer. Sci. 64 (1976b): 124.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. L. “Contributions of Economists to a Rational-decision-making Process in the Field of Agricultural Policy.” Decision-Making and Agriculture. Oxford: Agricultural Economics Institute, 1977.Google Scholar
Kaplan, A. “Positivist Ethics,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 12, Sills, D. L. (ed.), New York: Macmillan Co. & The Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. N.The Scope and Method of Political Economy. 4th ed. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, Bookseller, 1963.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I.The Ground and Nature of the Right. The Columbia University Press, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machlup, F. “Positive and Normative Economics,” in Economic Means and Social Ends, Heil-broner, R. (ed.). Englewood, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E.Principia Ethica. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1959; first printing, 1903.Google Scholar
National Commission on Research. “Review Processes: Assessing the Quality of Research Proposals.” Washington, D.C., May 1980, pp. ix, x and 1, 2.Google Scholar
Robbins, L.An Essay on the Nature & Significance of Economic Science. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1949.Google Scholar
Runes, D. D.Dictionary of Philosophy. Paterson, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams & Co., 1961, p. 118.Google Scholar