Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:14:05.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Regroupement’ and mobile societies: two Cameroon cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Philip Burnham
Philip Burnham
Affiliation:
University College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is a comparative study of the impact of colonial rule on two African societies, the Gbaya and the pastoral Fulani, inhabiting the Adamawa Plateau in central Cameroon. The main discussion focuses on the difficulties experienced by the French in their attempts to administer these two politically uncentralized and geographically mobile peoples. Geographical mobility was not the result of population pressure or other ecological constraint but was a political strategy and means of dispute regulation frequently employed by these societies living in a lightly populated region. Conflicting with this structural tendency towards mobility in both societies was the French policy of regroupement, the concentration and resettlement of subject peoples in stable villages. Examination of the historical record reveals that despite more or less stringent attempts on the part of the colonial powers to restructure Gbaya and pastoral Fulani societies along more politically amenable lines, these societies have changed little in this respect up to the present day and continue to pose the same problems of administration for the modern government of the United Republic of Cameroon.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1975 , pp. 577 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rudin, H., Germans in the Cameroons, 1884–1914 (New Haven, 1938)Google Scholar; Vine, V. Le, The Cameroons from Mandate to Independence (Berkeley, 1964)Google Scholar; and Wirz, A., Vom Sklavenhandel zum Kolonialen Handel (Zurich, 1972).Google Scholar

2 The forthcoming publication of a recent conference, entitled Contribution de la Recherche Ethnologique à l'histoire des Civilisations du Cameroun edited by Claude Tardits, will provide considerable data on the early colonial period. See also Chilver, E. and Kaberry, P., ‘From Tribute to Tax in a Tikar Chiefdom’, Africa, xxx, i (1960), 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Leis, P., ‘Accommodation in a Plural Chiefdom’, Man, n.s., v, iv (1970), 671–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Stoecker, H. (ed.), Kamerun unter Deutscher Kolonialherrschaft (Berlin, 1968).Google Scholar

3 Fieldwork on which the present paper is based was carried out by my wife and myself over a period of twenty-five months in the years 1968 to 1970 and in the summers of 1973 and 1974. I am indebted to the University of California at Los Angeles, the Wenner Gren Foundation, and the University of London for providing the necessary financial support. This paper was first presented at the 1974 conference of the African Studies Association (UK) held at Liverpool. I want to thank Dr Paul Baxter, convener of the Anthropology Section of that conference, for his help and comments.

4 Official government census, Meiganga sub-prefecture, 1966.

5 See Burnham, P., ‘Residential Organization and Social Change among the Gbaya of Meiganga, Cameroon, unpublished Ph.D. thesis submitted to the University of California at Los Angeles (1972)Google Scholar and Burnham, P., ‘Notes on Gbaya History’Google Scholar in Tardits, , ContributionGoogle Scholar, for synopses of Gbaya social history.

6 Tessmann, G., Die Baja: ein Negerstamm im mittleren Sudan, Teil II: Geistige Kultur (Stuttgart, 1937), 120–4.Google Scholar

7 Tessmann, Ibid, and Tessmann, G., Die Baja: ein Negerstamm im mittleren Sudan: Teil I: Materielle und seelische Kultur (Stuttgart, 1934).Google Scholar

8 In the present paper, ‘B’ and ‘D’ represent implosive stops, ‘ñ’ symbolizes a velar nasal, an apostrophe represents a glottal stop, and doubling a vowel symbol indicates vowel lengthening.

9 Archives of l'Institut de Recherches Scientifiques du Cameroun, Yaoundé. Report of Capt. Ripert, , Chef de Circonscription of Ngaoundere, 23 04 1918.Google Scholar

10 Ibid.

11 Cameroon National Archives, Yaoundé. Dossier APA 11766/D. Minutes of Meeting of Consultative Commission of Notables of Ngaoundere, Apr. 1924.

12 Cameroon National Archives, Yaoundé. Dossier APA 10956/B. Report for Third Quarter of 1922 by Commandant Lozal of Ngaoundere.

13 Cameroon National Archives, Yaoundé. Dossier APA 10956/B. Report for Second Quarter of 1924 by Portales, M., Chef de Circonscription of Ngaoundere.Google Scholar

14 Burnham, , ‘Residential Organization’, 80 ff.Google Scholar, and Michel, M., ‘Les Débuts du Soulèement de la Haute-Sangha en 1928’, Annales du Centre d'Enseignement Supérieur de Brazzaville, II (1966), 3–48.Google Scholar

15 See Gide, A., Voyage au Congo (Paris, 1927)Google Scholar and Le Rétour du Tchad (Paris, 1928).Google Scholar

16 Cameroon National Archives, Yaoundé. Dossier APA 10956/B. Annual Report of Circonscription de Ngaoundéré 1919, anon.Google Scholar, and Dossier APA 11766/D. Tournée Report for 05 and 06 1924, anon.Google Scholar

17 Cameroon National Archives, Yaoundé. Dossier APA 10956/B. Report for First Quarter of 1918 by Lt. Dechy, Commandant of Ngaoundere.

18 Burnham, , ‘Residential Organization’, 195.Google Scholar

19 Tessmann, , Die Baja: Teil I, 89 (translation).Google Scholar

20 Cameroon National Archives, Yaoundé. Dossier APA 11780/B. Tournée Report of Geli, M., Chef de Subdivision of Meiganga, 1932.Google Scholar

21 Cameroon National Archives, Yaoundé. Dossier APA 11736. Annual Report for 1951 by Granier, M., Chef de Subdivision of Meiganga.Google Scholar

22 Burnham, , ‘Residential Organization’, 196–7.Google Scholar

23 Lugard, F. D., The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa (London, 1965), 194 ff.Google Scholar, and Kirk-Greene, A. H. M. (ed.), Lugard and the Amalgamation of Nigeria: A Documentary Record (London, 1968), 70–2.Google Scholar

24 Delavignette, R., Freedom and Authority in French West Africa (London, 1950), 74–5.Google Scholar

25 Ibid. 75.

26 See Burnham, , ‘Residential Organization’Google Scholar for fuller details.

27 While it is not possible in the confines of this paper adequately to describe the essential elements of Gbaya ecology, it is useful nonetheless to point out that the Gbaya have more than enough agricultural land available and could lead a completely sedentary existence if they so desired. Gbaya therefore need not move great distances when they shift villages. Often, a move of less than a kilometer suffices and, even after a Gbaya has moved, he may continue to farm the fields he left behind at his former village site. See Burnham, ‘Residential Organization’.

28 Dognin, R., ‘L'Installation des Djafoun dans 1'Adamaoua camerounais’Google Scholar in Tardits, , Contribution.Google Scholar

29 Stenning, D., Savannah Nomads (London, 1959), 196 ff.Google Scholar

30 See Dupire, M., Organisation Sociale des Peul (Paris, 1970), ch. VIIGoogle Scholar, for detailed discussion of pastoral Fulani social organization.

31 Ibid. 304 (translation).

32 For a Niam-Niam perspective on this period, see Leis, , ‘Accommodation.’Google Scholar

33 Dognin, , ‘L'Installation’,Google Scholar

34 Ibid, and Dupire, , Organisation, 243–4.Google Scholar

35 Dognin, , ‘L'Installation’.Google Scholar

36 Ibid.

37 Ibid, and see also Pfeffer, G., ‘Die Djafun Bororo’, Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, LXVIII, i–iii (1936).Google Scholar

38 Archives of l'Institut de Recherches Scientifiques du Cameroun, Yaoundé. Tournée Report of Chef de Région d'Adamaoua through Meiganga Subdivision, 09 1936.Google Scholar

39 Dupire, , OrganisationGoogle Scholar, provides an excellent analysis of the traditional modes of Mbororo political competition.

40 Archives of Meiganga sub-prefecture, Dossiers VT/19/2 and VT/19/4.

41 However, it would not be accurate to claim, as certain writers have done for other parts of Africa, that current ethnic divisions are purely a product of the colonial experience.

42 Sahlins, M., Stone Age Economics (London, 1972), 48, 130 ff.Google Scholar