Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T19:57:56.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bunyoro and the British: A Reappraisal of the Causes for the Decline and Fall of an African Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

M. S. M. Kiwanuka
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The problem raised in this paper is fundamentally that of the value of oral traditions used as historical sources. There is a tendency to accept them uncritically and thereby to perpetuate myths which a little critical investigation would have ended years before. The present writer has attempted to demonstrate that a historian dealing with traditional history must widen his field far beyond the oral traditions which are of immediate interest to him. Like other sources, comparisons with and the cross-checking of the traditions of other countries are essential factors in reconstructing the pre-colonial history of Africa. The results of such an exercise have been shown in this paper, the main purpose of which has been to trace and reassess the causes for the decline and fall of Bunyoro, by using not only the oral traditions of Bunyoro, as has been the practice hitherto, but also those of her neighbours such as Ankole, Buganda, Busoga, Kiziba and Ruanda. The results have shown that the effects of succession wars were less disastrous than is often believed. But the economic and territorial Josses, coupled with the persistent lack of able leadership, were more important than the so-called federalism of the Babito. For a semipastoralist population, cattle plagues may have been as disastrous as other factors. The British no doubt played a role, but it deserves less emphasis than it has hitherto received. By the time of their arrival Bunyoro had declined almost beyond recovery, and it is doubtful whether Kabarega could even have retained Toro. The British treatment of Bunyoro and Kabarega was typical of the reactions of colonial regimes against African resisters. Some of the questions raised in the concluding paragraphs regarding the possible future of Bunyoro had not the British intervened are perhaps too speculative. Nevertheless, they are worth asking, if the history of Bunyoro is to be seen in the right perspective.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 603 - 619
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bunyoro is the country, Runyoro is the language, Kinyoro is the adjectival form (Nyoro-ish) and Mu-(s) Ba-(pl) Nyoro are the people. The first detailed record of the traditional history of Bunyoro was made by Mrs Fisher, A. B., Twilight Tales of the Black Baganda (London, 1923),Google Scholar by the Rev Roscoe, J., The Bakitara (London, 1923),Google Scholar by Bishop, Gorju, Entre le Victoria, l'Albert et l'Edouard (Rennes, 1920);Google Scholar these were followed by Bikunya's, P.Ky'Abakama ba Bunyoro (London, 1927), the accounts of K.W., the present Mukama (king) of Bunyoro, in the Uganda Journal of 1935, 1936–7,Google Scholar and by Nyakatura, J. W., Abakama ba Bunyoro Kitara (St Justin, Canada, 1947), 1–304; similar studies have followed, but they all use the above as their primary soures.Google Scholar

2 See Basil, Davidson, Black Mother (London, 1963), 131–2. Mr Davidson quotes Father Girolamo de Montesarchio, who spoke of a pitched battle between the Lord of Savo and a rebel army numbering many thousands in which only forty casualties had occurred.Google Scholar

3 Beattie, J., ‘Bunyoro: an African feudality?,’ J. Afr. Hist. v, no. I (1964), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar By the same author, Bunyoro: Kingdom (New York, 1964).Google Scholar

4 Nyakatura, , op. cit.Google Scholar

5 Ibid. Kinyoro tradition claims that Ankole, Rwanda, Buganda, Kiziba, Kooki and Toro were all once parts of one empire.

6 Roscoe, J., The Baganda (Cambridge, 1911), 346.Google Scholar

7 See SirApolo, Kaggwa, Basekabaka be Buganda (1953 ed.). Kagula was overthrown by his brothers; Kikuiwe, the successor, was overthrown by Mawanda. Mawanda himself was overthrown by his cousins. His successor, Namugala, was forced to abdicate by Kyabaggu. Kyabaggu himself was killed by his own sons, who nearly eliminated each other. Junju the successor of Kyabaggu was overthrown by his brother Semakokiro, who retained the throne until his death partly because of his policy of exterminating rivals.Google Scholar

8 Kaggwa, , op. cit. 57–9. But this argument need not be overstressed because there is no conceivable reason why succession wars did not lead to the same results in Bunyoro.Google Scholar

9 Ingham, K., ‘Some aspects of the history of western Uganda,’ Uganda J. XXI, no. 2 (1957), 131–49.Google Scholar

10 For Ankole, see Morris, H. F., A History of Ankole (Kampala, 1962);Google ScholarKatate, & Kamugungunu, , Abagabe Bankore (Kampala, 1962).Google Scholar For Rwanda, see Vansina, J., L'evolution du royaume Rwanda des origines à 1900 (Brussels, 1962), 1–100.Google Scholar

11 See Posnansky, M., ‘Towards an historical geography of Uganda’, E. A. Geographical Review (1963), 7–20.Google Scholar

12 The King's Men, ed. Fallers, L. A. (London and Nairobi, 1964), 25. Wrigley's argument that the advent of firearms in Buganda strengthened the hold of the government over its people is not borne Out by facts. The events of the 1880s and 1890s show that the contrary was the case.Google Scholar

13 Dunbar, R., A History of Bunyoro– Kitara (Nairobi, 1965), 1–253.Google Scholar

14 In a personal communication, Professor Oliver points out that this was a special kind of gun. Nevertheless, the fact that by 1862 the Kabaka of Buganda had not seen a gun of this particular kind suggests the relative scarcity of firearms in Buganda.

15 See Gray, J. R., History of the Southern Sudan, 1839–1889 (1961).Google Scholar See also Sanderson, G. N., Europe, England and the Upper Nile, 1882–1899 (Edinburgh, 1965).Google Scholar

16 Baker, S., Ismailia (London, 1874).Google Scholar

17 The actual quantities of firearms which passed into African hands is a subject which requires further investigation; it is beyond the scope of the present article.

18 Beachey, R., ‘The arms trade in E. Africa in the late nineteenth century’, J. Afr. Hist. III, no. 3 (1962), 451–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 According to the history of Bunyoro, Prince Kaboyo, the founder of the kingdom of Toro, was forced to secede because his father, Kyebambe III Nyamutukura, lived so long that his ambitious sons saw no chance of ascending the throne. Confirmation of this view may be deduced from the fact that his father, Kyebambe Nyamutukura, did not contest the secession. In fact it was not until the accession of an energetic and outstanding leader to the throne of Bunyoro that the secession of Toro was seriously challenged. See also Ronald, J. Harves, ‘Mirambo the Napoleon of E. Africa’, Tanganyika Notes and Records (1958), 10–28.Google Scholar

20 K. Ingham, ‘Some Aspects…’, loc. cit.

21 The present Mukama, who recorded the traditions of Bunyoro in 1934, speculated on Kabarega's plan of reconquest of Buganda (, K. W.Uganda J. 1937), and he wrote: ‘He was proposing to attack Buganda, and this was when he had erected his residence at Mukaiha Kinogozi, but the Europeans came before he had fulfilled his purpose ….’Google Scholar

22 Gorju, , op. cit. 41.Google Scholar

23 The wars of this period in Buganda are a very familiar subject, and we can only deal with them lightly here. See Perham, M., Lugard, The Years of Adventure, 1858–1898, I (London, 1956).Google Scholar

24 According to Dunbar (op. cit. 84), the reason why Kabarega did not seize this opportunity for allying himself with the Muslim Baganda was that all Baganda, ‘whether pagan or otherwise, were the sworn enemies of the Banyoro’.

25 See Low, D. A., Oxford D.Phil. thesis (1957). See also, by the same author, ‘The Northern Interior, 1840–1884’, inGoogle ScholarOliver, and Mathew, , History of East Africa, I (1964), 297–357.Google Scholar

26 Ford, J. and de Z. Hall, R., ‘History of Karagwe,’ T.N.R. XXIV (1947), 1–27.Google Scholar See also Césard, J., ‘Le Muhaya,’ Anthropos, XXXII (1937), 15–60;Google ScholarGorju, , op. cit. 81, 120.Google Scholar

27 Dunbar, , op. cit. 81.Google Scholar

28 Ibid. 38.

29 Bunyoro: An African Kingdom, 17.Google Scholar

30 See Basil, Davidson, Old Africa Rediscovered (London, 1961), 1–287, and Black Mother.Google Scholar For a comprehensive study of American and European attitudes towards Africa and the Africans, see Philip, D. Curtin, The Image of Africa: British Ideas and Action, 1780–1850 (London, 1965). The views quoted in this book are of course pre-colonial, but they provided the background to the views held by later generations during the nineteenth century and the colonial period.Google Scholar

31 See Dunbar, A. R., ‘The British and Bunyoro–Kitara, 1891–1899’, Uganda J. xxiv, no. 2 (1960), 229–41. Before the colonial period, many of the Bahaya groups in the northwest of modern Tanzania were fully fledged kingdoms, though small. See J. Césard, loc. cit., and J. Ford and R. de Z. Hall, loc. cit.Google Scholar

32 The Kenya–Somali Border dispute is one of the numerous examples—see Castagno, A. A., ‘The Somali–Kenyan controversy,’ Journal of Modern African Studies, II, no. 2 (1964), 165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar In the same issue of the journal, see also Mesfin, Wolde Mariam, ‘The background of the Ethio-Somalian boundary dispute’, 189–219.Google Scholar

33 An interesting accountof British violence is contained in Low's, D. A. chapter ‘Uganda: the establishment of the protectorate, 1894–1919’, in History of East Africa, vol. II, ed. Harlow, and Chilver, (London, 1965), 57–123.Google Scholar On the Kenya coast the Mazrui family, which had ruled for many generations, was smashed, and this meant the end of Arab dominance in that region. For an interesting account of the British military activities against the African resisters in modem Kenya, see Mungeam, G. H., British Rule in Kenya, 1895–1912 (London, 1966).Google Scholar

34 A company of 6,000 Sudanese soldiers, two Hotchkiss and three maxim guns.

35 Beattie, , op. cit.Google Scholar

36 This is discussed in greater detail in Kiwanuka, M. S. M, London Ph.D. thesis (1965), unpublished.Google Scholar

37 This question has been comprehensively discussed by Roberts, A. D., ‘The subimperialism of the Baganda’, J. Afr. Hist. III (1962), 435–50;CrossRefGoogle Scholar‘The lost countries of Bunyoro’, Uganda J. XXVI, no. 2 (1962), 194–9.Google Scholar

38 Most of the available sources tend to confirm this view. See SirJohn, Gray, ‘Acholi history’, Uganda J. xv, no. 2 (1951), 121–43;Google Scholar also ‘The Alur legend of Sir Samuel Baker and the Omukama Kabarega’, Uganda J. xv, no. 2 (1951), 187–90.Google Scholar

39 Dunbar, , op. cit. p. 82. His statement here is a little puzzling because he goes on to add: ‘on three occasions, Mwanga, Kabaka of Buganda, sent messengers to Kabarega saying that Mwanga would intercede on his behalf with the British’. It is difficult to reconcile this statement with Dunbar's conviction that the Baganda were determined to see the Banyoro crushed.Google Scholar

40 See Curtin, , op. cit. 315.Google Scholar

41 Hardinge, to Salisbury, , 24 04 1897,Google Scholar F.O. 107/77, quoted by Mungeam, G. H., op. cit. 30.Google Scholar

42 Bell, H. H. J., Glimpses of a Governor's Life (London, 1946), 128.Google Scholar

43 Low, D. A., chapter mentioned in footnote above, pp. 59–60.Google Scholar

44 Ibid..

45 Karagwe, for instance. Ford and Hall have pointed out that cattle epizootics during the late nineteenth century played a decisive role in ruining these semi-pastoral kingdoms.