Skip to main content Accessibility help

Defending the Co-Branding Benefits of Sponsorship B2B Partnerships: The Case of Ambush Marketing



This global study analyzes ambush marketing from the perspective of the sponsor and sport entity as partners in a business-to-business relationship. While it remains a real threat to the strategic co-branding objectives sought from the relationship, ambush is not necessarily as dangerous to sponsors as it has been in the past. Sponsors can use ambushers' attacks to their advantage by drawing attention to issues of legitimacy, by enhancing brand or corporate authenticity, and by appealing to consumers increasingly wary of disingenuous brands. Our findings confirm the potential to approach the sponsorship relationship as a co-marketing alliance to optimize co-branding objectives and to negate the effects of ambush.



Hide All


Aaker, D. A.Leveraging the Corporate Brand.” California Management Review 46, 3 (2004): 619.
Bayless, A.Ambush Marketing Is Becoming a Popular Event at Olympic Games.” Wall Street Journal, February 8, 1988.
Cliffe, S. J., and J. Motion. “Building Contemporary Brands: A Sponsorship-Based Strategy.” Journal of Business Research 58, 8 (2005): 106877.
Cornwell, T. B.Sponsorship-Linked Marketing Development.” Sports Marketing Quarterly 4, 4 (1995): 1324.
Greyser, S.NBC's Olympic Broadcast Strategy,” based on interviews with Nicholas P. Schiavone, Harvard Business of Sports course, September 2004.
Inkpen, A. C., and J. Ross. “Why Do Some Strategic Partnerships Persist Beyond Their Useful Life?California Management Review 44, 1 (2001): 13259.
Johar, G., and M. T. Pham. “Relatedness, Prominence, and Constructive Sponsor Identification.” Journal of Marketing Research 36, 3 (1999): 299312.
Keller, K. L.Managing Brands in the Long Run: Brand Reinforcement and Revitalization Strategies.” California Management Review 41, 3 (1999): 10225.
Lardinois, T., and P. Quester. “Attitudinal Effects of Sponsorship on Television Audiences and the Influence of Sponsors' Prominence: Interaction and Main Effects of Two Types of Sponsorship.” Journal of Advertising Research 41, 1 (2001): 4858.
Meenaghan, T.Ambush Marketing—A Threat to Corporate Sponsorship.” Sloan Management Review 38, 1 (1996): 10313.
Murphy, C., and C. Dignam. “How to Steal the World Cup.” Marketing, May 9, 2002.
Penaloza, L.The Commodification of the American West: Marketers' Production of Cultural Meanings at the Trade Show.” Journal of Marketing 64, 4 (2000): 82109.
Pine, B. J., and J. H. Gilmore. “Welcome to the Experience Economy.” Harvard Business Review, July–August 1998.
Quester, P. G.Awareness as a Measure of Sponsorship Effectiveness: The Adelaide Formula One Grand Prix and Evidence of Incidental Ambush Effects.” Journal of Marketing Communications 3, 2 (1997): 2431.
Quester, P. G., and B. Thompson. “Advertising and Promotion Leverage on Arts Sponsorship Effectiveness.” Journal of Advertising Research 41, 1 (2001): 3347.
Speed, R., and P. Thompson. “Determinants of Sports Sponsorship Response.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28, 2 (2000): 22638.
Stipp, H., and N. P. Schiavone. “Modeling the Impact of Olympic Sponsorship on Corporate Image.” Journal of Advertising Research 36, 4 (1996): 2228.
Walliser, B.Les Determinants de la Memorisation des Sponsors.” Proceedings de la Deuxieme Journee de recherche de L'AFM, Chambray, France, 1994.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Defending the Co-Branding Benefits of Sponsorship B2B Partnerships: The Case of Ambush Marketing



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.