Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T06:26:13.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical Strategic Practice and Sino-Japanese Pluralized Regional Leadership: Collective Leadership, Competitive Coexistence and a Blocking Power Relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2014

JINSOO PARK
JINSOO PARK*
Affiliation:
Department of International Relations, Sunmoon Universityjinsoopark93@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper aims to develop a coherent analytical tool to explain the dynamics of Sino-Japanese pluralized leadership. Highlighting the constructivist concept of critical strategic practice, it argues that the nature of pluralized leadership is not fixed by existing social structures, but rather can be dynamically changed by potential leaders through critical reflection and actions to transform identities. It then suggests three possible types of pluralized leadership: collective leadership, competitive coexistence, and a blocking power relationship. These are determined by whether two leadership aspirants succeed in establishing institutionalized social networks and shared norms between them and whether a leadership aspirant gains a majority of followers for its leadership project. The paper shows that China and Japan have engaged in both competitive coexistence and a blocking power relationship through their critical strategic practice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 69 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Amitav (2007), ‘The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics’, World Politics, 59 (4): 629–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AFP (Agence France Presse) (1999), ‘Chinese Premier Zhu Supports East AMF Idea’, 23 November, www.factiva.com.Google Scholar
Ahn, Byung-Jun (2004), ‘The Rise of China and the Future of East Asian Integration’, Asia-Pacific Review, 11 (2): 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altbach, Eric (1997), ‘The AMF Proposal: A Case Study of Japanese Regional Leadership’, Japan Economic Institute (JEI) Report, No. 47a.Google Scholar
Beeson, Mark (2005), ‘Rethinking Regionalism: Europe and East Asia in Comparative Historical Perspective’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12 (6): 969–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blustein, Paul (2001), The Chastening: Inside the Crisis That Rocked the Global Financial System and Humbled the IMF, New York: Public Affairs Google Scholar
Burns, James, M. (1978), Leadership, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Business Times(Singapore) (2003), ‘Accommodating China’, 22 February, https://global.factiva.com.Google Scholar
Cai, Kevin (2003), ‘The ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement and East Asian Regional Grouping’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25 (3): 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, Kent (2006), ‘China and Japan's Simmering Rivalry’, Foreign Affairs, 85 (2): 129–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Gerald (2012), ‘China's Response to the Global Financial Crisis and Its Regional Leadership in East Asia’, Asia Europe Journal, 9: SI, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Benjamin (1998), The Geography of Money, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Andrew, Richard, Higgott, and Kim, Nossal (1991), ‘Bound to Follow? Leadership and Followership in the Gulf Conflict’, Political Science Quarterly, 106 (3): 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, Christopher (2008), ‘What Region to Lead? Development in East Asian Regionalism and Questions of Regional Leader’, in Dent, Christopher (ed.), China, Japan and Regional Leadership in East Asia, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar
Destradi, Sandra (2010), ‘Regional Powers and Their Strategies: Empire, Hegemony, and Leadership’, Review of International Studies, 36 (4): 903–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosch, Jörn (2008), ‘Who Is Leading Who in ASEAN–China Relations? Community-Building versus Pax Sinica in the Management of Regional Security’, in Christopher, Dent (ed.), China, Japan and Regional Leadership in East Asia, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 156–79.Google Scholar
Flemes, Daniel (2009a), ‘Brazilian Foreign Policy in the Changing World Order’, South African Journal of International Affairs, 16 (2): 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemes, Daniel (2009b), ‘Regional Power South Africa’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 27 (2): 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemes, Daniel (ed.) (2010), Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Flemes, Daniel and Thorsten, Wojczewski (2010), ‘Contested Leadership in International Relations Power Politics in South America, South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa’, GIGA Working Paper No. 121, German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukazawa, Junichi and Toshinao, Ishii (2002), ‘China's ASEAN Strategy Outmaneuvers Japan’, Daily Yomiuri, 6 November, www.factiva.com.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert (1981), War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert (2001), Global Political Economy: Understanding International Economic Order, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, Evelyn (2008), ‘Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia’, International Security, 32 (3): 113–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Avery (2005), Rising to the Challenge: China's Grand Strategy and International Security, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, William, W. (2011), ‘The Asian Monetary Fund Reborn? Implications of Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization’, Asia Policy, No. 11, 79–104.Google Scholar
Hamanaka, Shintaro (2008), ‘Comparing Summitry, Financial and Trade Regionalism in East Asia: From the Japanese Perspective’, in Dent, Christopher (ed.), China, Japan and Regional Leadership in East Asia, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 67–83.Google Scholar
Hughes, Christopher (2008), ‘Japan's Policy towards China: Domestic Structural Change, Globalization, History and Nationalism’, in Dent, Christopher (ed.), China, Japan and Regional Leadership in East Asia, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 37–51.Google Scholar
Hughes, Christopher (2009), ‘Japan's Response to China's Rise: Regional Engagement, Global Containment, Dangers of Collision’, International Affairs, 85 (4): 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hund, Markus (2003), ‘ASEAN Plus Three: Towards a New Age of Pan-East Asian Regionalism? A Skeptic's Appraisal’, Pacific Review, 16 (3): 383–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (1995), ‘Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics’, Review of International Studies, 21 (4): 331–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katada, Saori N. (2002), ‘Japan and Asian Monetary Regionalisation: Cultivating a New Regional Leadership after the Asian Financial Crisis’, Geopolitics, 7 (1): 85–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katada, Saori N. (2008), ‘From a Supporter to a Challenger? Japan's Currency Leadership in Dollar-Dominated East Asia’, Review of International Political Economy, 15 (3): 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles (1973), The World in Depression 1929–1939, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles (1981), ‘Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Riders’, International Studies Quarterly, 25 (2): 242–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles (1986), ‘Hierarchy versus Inertial Cooperation’, International Organization, 40 (4): 841–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen, D. (1976), ‘State Power and the Structure of International Trade’, World Politics, 28 (3): 317–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kugler, Jacek and Organski, A. F. K. (1989), ‘The Power Transition: A Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation’, in Midlarski, Manus I. (ed.), Handbook of War Studies, Boston: Unwin Hyman, pp. 171–94.Google Scholar
Lake, David (1993), ‘Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch with Potential?’, International Studies Quarterly, 37 (4): 459–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Douglas (2010), ‘Dimensions of Hard Power: Regional Leadership and Material Capabilities’, in Flemes, Daniel (ed.), Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
Li, Peng (1997), ‘Statement at the Annual Meetings of the Boards of Governors of the World Bank Group and the International Monetary Fund’, Hong Kong, China, September 23–25, http://www.imf.org/external/am/speeches/pdf/pr01e.pdf.Google Scholar
Li, Zhaoxing (2005), ‘Peace, Development and Cooperation: Banner for China's Diplomacy in the New Era’, 22 August, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/zxxx/t208032.htm (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Lincoln, Edward (2004), East Asian Economic Regionalism, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Lipscy, Phillip (2003), ‘Japan's Asian Monetary Fund Proposal’, Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs, 3 (1): 93–104.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter (1999), ‘Explaining Regional Integration Outcomes’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOFAJ (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan) (2004), ‘Issue Papers Prepared by the Government of Japan’, 25 June, http://www.mofa.go.jp.Google Scholar
MOFJ (Ministry of Finance, Japan) (1998), ‘A New Initiative to Overcome the Asian Currency Crisis – New Miyazawa Initiative’, http://www.mof.go.jp/english/international_policy/financial_cooperation_in_asia/new_miyazawa_initiative/e1e042.htm.Google Scholar
Moore, Thomas (2007), ‘China's Rise in Asia’, in Dieter, Heribert (ed.), The Evolution of Regionalism in East Asia: Economic and Security Issues, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 34–56.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (1991), ‘Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community’, International Organization, 45 (1): 19–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabers, Dirk (2010), ‘Power, Leadership, and Hegemony in International Politics: The Case of East Asia’, Review of International Studies, 36 (4): 931–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Nation (2000), ‘Asian Leaders Join to Protect Region's Finances’, 7 May, www.factiva.com.Google Scholar
NIDS (National Institute for Defense Studies) (2003), East Asian Strategic Review 2003, Tokyo: NIDS.Google Scholar
NIDS (National Institute for Defense Studies) (2007), East Asian Strategic Review 2007, Tokyo: NIDS.Google Scholar
Nolte, Detlef (2010), ‘How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics’, Review of International Studies, 36 (4): 881–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph and David, A. Welch (2011), Understanding Global Conflict and Cooperation: An Introduction to Theory and History, 8th edn, Boston: Longman.Google Scholar
Pang, Zhongying (2009), ‘Bigger Role for China in Regional Cooperation’, China Daily, 5 January, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2009–01/05/content_7365637.htm.Google Scholar
Park, Jinsoo (2013), ‘Political Rivals and Regional Leaders: Dual Identities and Sino-Japanese Relations within East Asian Cooperation’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 6 (1): 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Yung Chul and Yunjong, Wang (2005), ‘The Chiang Mai Initiative and Beyond’, World Economy, 28 (1): 99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Margaret (2010), ‘Domestic Institutional Constraints on China's Leadership in East Asian Economic Cooperation Mechanisms’, Journal of Contemporary China, 19 (6): 621–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Thomas (2002), ‘Co-operative Hegemony: Power, Ideas and Institutions in Regional Integration’, Review of International Studies, 28 (4): 677–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pempel, T. J. (1999), ‘The Developmental Regime in a Changing World Economy’, in Woo-Cummings, Meredith (ed.), The Developmental State, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 137–81.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. (2005), ‘Introduction: Emerging Webs of Regional Connectedness’, in Pempel, T. J. (ed.), Remapping East Asia: The Construction of a Region, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Rapkin, David (2001), ‘The United States, Japan, and the Power to Block: APEC and AMF Cases’, Pacific Review, 14 (3): 373–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapkin, David and Jonathan, Strand (1997), ‘The US and Japan in the Bretton Woods Institutions: Sharing or Contesting Leadership?’, International Journal, 52: 265–96.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, John (2002), ‘A Three Bloc World? The New East Asian Regionalism’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2 (2): 167–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Caroline (2008), ‘Sino-Japanese Relations after Koizumi and the Limits of “New Era” Diplomacy’, in Dent, Christopher (ed.), China, Japan and Regional Leadership in East Asia, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 52–64.Google Scholar
Rozman, Gilbert (2003), ‘Sino-Japanese Relations: Mutual Images and the Balance between Globalization and Regionalism’, Woodrow Wilson Center Asia Program Special Report, No. 113, July, pp. 8–13.Google Scholar
Sakuwa, Kentaro (2009), ‘A Not So Dangerous Dyad: China's Rise and Sino-Japanese Rivalry’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 9 (3): 497–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schirm, Stefan (2010), ‘Leaders in Need of Followers: Emerging Powers in Global Governance’, European Journal of International Relations, 16 (2): 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoeman, Maxi (2003), ‘South Africa as an Emerging Middle Power: 1994–2003’, in Daniel, John et al. (eds.), State of the Nation: South Africa 2003–2004, Cape Town: HSRC Press, pp. 349–67.Google Scholar
Shirk, Susan (2005), China: Fragile Super Power, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan (1985), ‘The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory’, International Organization, 39 (4): 579–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soesastro, Hadi (2006), ‘East Asia: Many Clubs, Little Progress’, Far Eastern Economic Review, 169 (1): 50–53.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Richard (2002), ‘ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East Asian Regionalism?’, Asian Survey, 42 (3): 440–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Ezra (2003), ‘The US–Japan–China Triangle’, Woodrow Wilson Center Asia Program Special Report, No. 113, July, pp. 3–7.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Matsuo (2004), ‘Issues in Regional Integration of East Asia: Conflicting Priorities and Perceptions’, Asia-Pacific Review, 11 (2): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Webber (ed.) (1999), The Franco-German Relationship in the European Union, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Webber, Douglas (2001), ‘Two Funerals and a Wedding? The Ups and Downs of Regionalism in East Asia and Asia-Pacific after the Asian Crisis’, Pacific Review, 14 (3): 339–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1992), ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, 46 (2): 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, Alan (2001), ‘Asia Takes Baby Steps toward Closer Monetary Ties’, Reuters News, 15 January, https://global.factiva.com.Google Scholar
Yang, Jiang (2010), ‘Response and Responsibility: China in East Asian Financial Cooperation’, Pacific Review, 23 (5): 603–623.Google Scholar
Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka (2003), Japan and East Asia in Transition: Trade Policy, Crisis and Evolution, and Regionalism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Oran (1991), ‘Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society’, International Organization, 45 (3): 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar