Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T08:59:51.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Le Metafore e La Teoria Delle Relazioni Internazionali

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Matteo Stocchetti

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fino a tempi relativamente recenti – più o meno fino alla fine della guerra fredda – la triade realismo, pluralismo, strutturalismo ha espresso un ruolo analogo a quello di una sorta di limes disciplinare e, come tale, ambiguo nei riguardi dello spazio cognitivo oggetto di indagine. Espressione della forza di programmi di ricerca ormai istituzionalizzati da una presenza accademica pluridecennale, la stessa triade ha delimitato anche la frontiera dell'identità disciplinare, i limiti all'interno del quale la riflessione sistematica sui problemi della politica internazionale poteva veder riconosciuto il proprio diritto di cittadinanza nell'ambito della teoria delle R.I.

Summary

Summary

The political role of international theoretical discourse is an essential and most contested issue in the IR contemporary debate. The resistance of traditional perspectives to the inclusion of self-reflective elements on the agenda of international political analysis reflects the inadequacy of their theoretical framework to bear with the ambiguous relation between political and theoretical discourse. I argue that metaphorical analysis has the potentialities to offer both an important self-reflective contribution to IR discipline but also to discard its theoretical boundaries – as defined by positivist and neo-positivist assumptions.

Type
Note
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , August 2002 , pp. 305 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Società editrice il Mulino, Bologna 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Adler, E. (1997), Seizing the Middle Ground; Constructivism in World Politics, in «European Journal of International Relations», vol. 3, n. 3, pp. 319–363.Google Scholar
Arcuri, L. (a cura di) (1995), Manuale di Psicologia Sociale, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ashley, R. (1981), Political Realism and Human Interests, in «International Studies Quarterly», vol. 25, n. 2, pp. 204–246.Google Scholar
Ashley, R. e Walker, R.B.J. (1990a), Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies, in «International Studies Quarterly», vol. 34, n. 3, pp. 259–268.Google Scholar
Ashley, R. (1990b), Reading Dissidence/Writing the discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies, in «International Studies Quarterly», vol. 34, n. 3, pp. 367–416.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D. (a cura di) (1993), Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P.L. e Luckman, T. (1966), The Social Construction of Reality, Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday; trad. it. La realtà come costruzione sociale, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1969.Google Scholar
Biersteker, T.J. e Weber, C. (a cura di) (1996), State Sovereignty as Social Construct, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. (1996), The Timeless Wisdom of Realism?, in Smith, S., Booth, K., Zalewski M., M. (a cura di), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–65.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. e Little, R. (2000), International Systems in World History. Remaking the Study of International Relations, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (1985), Words, Discourse and Metaphors: The Meaning of deterrent and deterrence, in Chilton, P. (a cura di), Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate: Nukespeak Today, Pinter, London, pp. 103–127.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (1988), Orwellian Language and the Media, London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (1996), Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House, New York, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. e Ilyin, M., (1993), Metaphor in Political Discourse: the Case of the «Common European House», in «Discourse and Society», vol. 4, n. 1, pp. 7–31.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. e Lakoff, G. (1995), Foreign Policy by Metaphor, in C. Schäffner e A.L. Wenden (a cura di), Language and Peace, Aldershot, Dartmouth, cap. 4.Google Scholar
Connolly, W. (1974), The terms of political discourse, Lexington, Heath.Google Scholar
Corbetta, P. (1999), Metodologia e tecniche della ricerca sociale, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1981), Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory, in «Millennium: Journal of International Studies», vol. 10, n. 2, pp. 126–155.Google Scholar
Der Derian, J. (1987), Diplomacy, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Der Derian, J. (1995), The Value of Security: Hobbes, Marx, Nietzsche, and Baudrillard, in Lipschutz, R.D. (a cura di), On Security, New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 24–45.Google Scholar
Doty, R. (1993), Foreign policy as a social construction: A post–positivist analysis of U.S. counterinsurgency policy in the Phillippines, in «International Studies Quarterly», vol. 37, n. 3, pp. 297–320.Google Scholar
Emiliani, F. e Zani, B., (1998), Elementi di psicologia sociale, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Enloe, C. (1989), Bananas, Bases, and Beaches: Making Feminist Sense of International Relations, London, Pandora.Google Scholar
Enloe, C. (1993), The Morning After: Sexual Politics in the Post-Cold War Era, New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995), Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language, London, Longman.Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1990), Il linguaggio dimenticato, Milano, Bompiani. Tit. or. The Forgotten Language, 1951.Google Scholar
Gargani, A. (1975), Il sapere senza fondamenti, Torino, Einaudi.Google Scholar
George, J. (1994), Discourses of Global Politics. A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations, Boulder, Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
George, J. e Campbell, D. (1990), Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations, in «International Studies Quarterly», vol. 34, n. 3, pp. 269–294.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. (1995), Social Pragmatics and the Origins of the Psychological Discourse, in Gergen, K. e Davis, K. (a cura di), The Social Construction of the Person, New York, Springer-Verlag, pp. 111–128.Google Scholar
Grossen, M. (1988), La construction sociale de l'intersubjectivité entre adulte et infant en situation de test, Cousset, Delval.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1972), Knowledge and human interests, Boston, Beacon Press. Tit. or. Erkenntnis und Interesse, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1968.Google Scholar
Helman, D.H. (a cura di) (1988), Analogical Reasoning: Perspectives of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and philosophy, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. (1987), Critical theory and the inter-paradigm debate, in «Millennium: Journal of International Studies», vol. 16, n. 2, 231–249.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. (1991), Restructuring, Reconstruction, Reinscription, Re articulation: Four Voices in Critical International Theory, in «Millennium: Journal of International Studies», vol. 20, n. 2, 169–185.Google Scholar
Keane, M.T. (1988), Analogical problem solving, Chichester, England: Ellis Harwood.Google Scholar
Keane, M.T., Ledgeway, T. e Duff, S. (1994), Constraints on analogical mapping: A comparison of three models, in «Cognitive Science», vol. 18, n. 3, pp. 387–438.Google Scholar
Keeley, J.F. (1990), Toward a Foucauldian analysis of international regimes, in «International Organization», vol. 44, n. 1, pp. 83–105.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. (1988), International Institutions: Two Approaches, in «International Studies Quarterly», vol. 32, n. 4, pp. 379–396.Google Scholar
Klein, B.S. (1998), Politics by Design: Remapping Security Landscapes, in «European Journal of International Relations», vol. 4, n. 3, pp. 327–345.Google Scholar
Klotz, A. (1995), Norms reconstituting interest: global racial equality and U.S. sanctions against South Africa, in «International Organization», vol. 49, n. 3, pp. 451–78.Google Scholar
Knorr, K. e Rosenau, J.N. (1969), Tradition and Science in the Study of International Politics, in Knorr, K. e Rosenau, J.N., (a cura di), Contending Approaches to International Politics, Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, F. (1989), Rules, Norms, and Decisions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, F. (2000), Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt's «Social Theory of International Politics» and the Constructivist Challenge, in «Millennium: Journal of International Studies», vol. 29, n. 1, pp. 73–101.Google Scholar
Kubálková, V. (a cura di) (2001), Foreign Policy in a Constructed World, Armonk, M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Kubálková, V., Onuf, N. e Kowert, P. (a cura di) (1998), International Relations in a Constructed World, New York, M.A. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Laffey, M. e Weldes, J., (1997), Beyond Belief: Ideas and Symbolic Technologies in the Study of International Relations, in «European Journal of International Relations», vol. 3, n. 2, pp. 193–237.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. e Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lapid, Y. (1989), The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era, in «International Studies Quarterly», vol. 33, n. 3, pp. 235–254.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H.D. (1946), Describing The Content of Communication, in Smith, B.L., Lasswell, H.D. e Casey, R.D. (a cura di), Propaganda, Communication and the Public Opinion, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Linklater, A. (1996), The Achievements of Critical Theory, in Smith, S., Booth K. e Zalewski (a cura di), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–298.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. (1994), The false Promise of International Institutions, in «International Security», vol. 19, n. 3, pp. 5–49.Google Scholar
Mefford, D. (1987), Analogical reasoning and the definition of the situation, in Hermann, C., Kegley, C., e Rosenau, J. N. (a cura di), New directions in the study of foreign policy, Boston, Allen and Unwin, pp. 211–244.Google Scholar
Milliken, J. (1999), The Study of discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods, in «European Journal of International Relations», vol. 5, n. 2, pp. 225–254.Google Scholar
Milner, H. (1991), The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations: A Critique, in «Review of International Studies», vol. 17, n. 1, pp. 67–85.Google Scholar
Milner, H. (1992), International Theories of Cooperation among Nations: A Review Essay, in «World Politics», vol. 44, n. 3, pp. 466–496.Google Scholar
Mutimer, D. (1997), Reimagining Security: The Metaphors of Prolifereation, in Krause, K. e Williams, M.C. (a cura di), Critical Security Studies, London, University College London, pp. 187–221.Google Scholar
Neumann, I. (1998), Uses of the Other. The «East» in European Identity Formation, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Novik, L.R. (1988), Analogical transfer: Process and individual differences, in Helman, D.H. (a cura di), Analogical reasoning, Dordrecht, Netherlands Reidel, pp. 125–145.Google Scholar
Onuf, N.J. (1989), World of our making: Rule and rules in social theory and international relations, Columbia, University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, M.J. (1997), The use of analogies in developing outer space law, in «International Organization», vol. 51, n. 2, pp. 245–274.Google Scholar
Price, R. e Reus-Smit, C. (1998), Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism, in «European Journal of International Relations», vol. 4, n. 3, pp. 259–294.Google Scholar
Powell, R. (1994), Anarchy in international Relations Theory: The Neorealist – Neoliberal Debate, in «International Organization» vol. 48, n. 2, pp. 313–344.Google Scholar
Rigotti, F. (1992), Il potere e le sue metafore, Milano, Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1980), Prospective Social Psychological Contributions to a Truly Interdisciplinary Understanding of Ordinary Language, in «Journal of Language and Social Psychology», vol. 2, n. 1, pp. 89–104.Google Scholar
Rumelahrt, D.E. e Norman, D.A. (1981), Analogical processes in learning, in Anderson, J.R. (a cura di), Cognitive skills and their acquisition, Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 335–360.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R. (1979), Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M.J., Bonham, G.M. e Heradstveit, D. (1988), A discursive Practices Approach to Collective Decision-Making, in «International Studies Quarterly», vol. 32, n. 4, pp. 397–449.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (1996), The European Union and a Changing Europe: Establishing the Boundaries of Order, in «Journal of Common Market Studies», vol. 34, n. 1, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (1996), Positivism and Beyond, in Smith, S., Booth, K. e Zalewski, M. (a cura di), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–44.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (a cura di) (1993), Framing in discourse, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. e Kahneman, D. (1982), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, in Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. e Tversky, A. (a cura di), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. (1985), Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 3 voll., London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vosniadu, S. e Ortony, A. (a cura di) (1999), Similarity and analogical reasoning, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waever, O. (1996), The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate, in Smith, S., Booth, K. e Zalewski, M. (a cura di), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–185.Google Scholar
Walker, R.B.J. (1993), Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walt, S. (1991), The Renaissance of Security Studies, in «International Studies Quarterly», vol. 35, n. 2, pp. 211–240.Google Scholar
Waltz, K.N. (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York, Random House, trad. it. Teoria della politica internazionale, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1987.Google Scholar
Waltz, K.N. (1990), Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory, in «Journal of International Affairs», vol. 44, n. 1, pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
Weldes, J. e Saco, D., (1996), Making State Action Possible: The United States and the Discursive Construction of the «Cuban Problem», 1960–1994, in «Millennium: Journal of International Studies», vol. 25, n. 2, pp. 361–395.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1992), Anarchy is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics, in «International Organization», vol. 46, n. 2, pp. 391–425.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1995), Constructing International Politics, in «International Security», vol. 20, n. 1, pp. 71–81.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1999), Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, M.D. e Schafer, M. (1998), Is There Method in Our Madness? Ways of Assessing Cognition in International Relations, in «Mershon International Studies Review», vol. 42, n. 1, pp. 63–96.Google Scholar