Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T06:39:52.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To MSNAP or not to MSNAP? Testing a small regional memory clinic against the UK Memory Service National Accreditation Program (MSNAP)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2018

E. B. Sweeney ,
J. E. Foley ,
S. Fitzsimons  and
A. Denihan
E. B. Sweeney*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
J. E. Foley
Affiliation:
Navan Cognitive Clinic, HSE, An Ré Órga, Navan, Co. Meath, Ireland
S. Fitzsimons
Affiliation:
Navan Cognitive Clinic, HSE, An Ré Órga, Navan, Co. Meath, Ireland
A. Denihan
Affiliation:
Navan Cognitive Clinic, HSE, An Ré Órga, Navan, Co. Meath, Ireland
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr E. B. Sweeney, Department of Psychiatry, TCD c/o Medical Teaching Centre, St. Patrick’s University Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland. (Email: corroone@tcd.ie)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aim

To investigate whether a small regional memory clinic would benefit from engaging with a structured external audit process such as the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Memory Service National Accreditation Program (MSNAP).

Background

The Psychiatry of Old Age service in Navan operates a public cognitive clinic. Despite the publication of the 2014 National Dementia Strategy, there are currently no national standards for memory clinics in Ireland. It may be beneficial to link in with an external quality control system as part of routine clinical governance.

Methods

Published data from the MSNAP group was reviewed and a set of audit materials extrapolated to replicate the MSNAP self-review process. The audit cycle involved (1) retrospective case review, (2) institution of a range of interventions and (3) a prospective audit, which included service user feedback.

Results

Overall the results demonstrated a high standard of service, especially in the areas of accessibility, assessment and communication of diagnosis. The clinic performed well against MSNAP key performance indicators. Patient and carer satisfaction with the service was very high. Clinic policies needed further development, particularly in the areas of referral, consent and data protection.

Conclusions

The process was useful, providing clear pointers for action. It highlighted the need to formalise organisational and practice policies, patient support and education, audit and outreach. Although accreditation is a laborious process requiring financial investment, it provides a strong scaffold to maintain and improve standards and is likely to be a valuable learning experience, where national guidelines are lacking.

Keywords

Accreditationauditcognitive impairmentdementiamemory clinic
Type
Audit
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 145 - 151
Copyright
© College of Psychiatrists of Ireland 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourn, J (2007). Improving services and support for people with dementia (https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/0607604.pdf). Accessed 30 September 2017.Google Scholar
Cahill, S, Pierce, M, Moore, V (2014). A national survey of memory clinics in the Republic of Ireland. International Psychogeriatrics 26, 605–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahill, S, Shea, EO, Pierce, M (2012). Creating Excellence in Dementia Care. Research Review for Ireland ’s National Dementia Strategy (dementia.ie/images/uploads/site-images/creating_excellence_in_dementia_care_2012.pdf). Accessed 29 September 2017.Google Scholar
Clary, L, Colwill A, Copland E, Hodge S (2015). MSNAP Fourth National Report (www.rcpsych.ac.uk/memory-network). Accessed 29 September 2017.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2014). The Irish National Dementia Strategy. Department of Health (http://health.gov.ie/blog/publications/the-irish-national-dementia-strategy/). Accessed 29 September 2017.Google Scholar
Hodge S, Hailey E (2015). MSNAP Third National Report (http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/memory-network). Accessed 18 April 2018.Google Scholar
Hodge, S, Hailey, E, Orrell, M (2014). Memory Services National Accreditation Programme (MSNAP): Standards for Memory Services. Royal College of Psychiatrists (http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Memory+Services+National+Accreditation+Programme+(MSNAP)+Standards+for+Memory+Services#0). Accessed 29 September 2017.Google Scholar
Hodge, S, Hailey E, Colwill A, Walker L, Orrell M (2016). Memory Services National Accreditation Programme (MSNAP) Standards for Memory Services, 5th edn (www.rcpsych.ac.uk/memory-network). Accessed 8 February 2018.Google Scholar
Hopper, L, Hughes S, Burke T, Irving K (2008). A National Dementia Registry for Ireland (https://www.alzheimer.ie/getattachment/About-Us/Research/A-National-Dementia-Registry-for-Ireland/Dementia-Registry-web-version.pdf.aspx). Accessed 8 February 2018.Google Scholar
Pierce, M, Cahill, S (2014). Prevalence and Projections of Dementia in Ireland, 2011–2046 (http://dementia.ie/images/uploads/site-images/Dementia_Prevalence_2011_2046.pdf). Accessed 30 September 2017.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2015). Memory Services National Accreditation Programme (MSNAP) Accreditation Process (http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/MSNAP%20Accreditation%20Process%20-%20August%202015.pdf). Accessed 29 September 2017.Google Scholar