Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:20:18.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nadir Shah and the Ja'fari Madhhab Reconsidered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Ernest Tucker
Ernest Tucker*
Affiliation:
History Department, U.S. Naval Academy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In less than twenty years, Nadir Shah built an empire across Iran, India, and Central Asia. When he took the throne on the Mughan steppe in 1148/1736, Nadir confronted the problem of how to legitimize his reign after two centuries of Shi'i Safavid rule. He attempted to solve this problem, in part, by challenging Iran's Twelver Shi'i identity.

Nadir proposed to the Ottomans that Twelver Shi'ism be considered a fifth school of Sunni Islam, to be called the Ja'fari madhhab after the sixth Imam, Ja'far al-Sadiq. In exchange for Shi'i renunciation of such practices as sabb (the ritual cursing of the first three caliphs), Nadir proposed that the Ottomans give this Ja'fari madhhab all the privileges enjoyed by the four Sunni schools, and that a fifth pillar be erected in the Ka'bah in Mecca to commemorate it. He asked that the Ottomans allow him to appoint the leader of the annual ḥajj caravan from Iran.

Type
Articles
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 27 , Issue 1-4: Religion and Society in Islamic Iran during the Pre-Modern Era , 1994 , pp. 163 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The terms “Shi'i” and “Shi'ism,” as used in this essay, refer only to Twelver Shi'is and Twelver Shi'ism.

2. The phrase madhhab-i ja'farī has long been used to refer to Twelver Shi'ism. Ja'far al-Sadiq is regarded by Shi'is as one of the foremost scholars of fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence). See Encyclopedia of Islam, 2nd ed., s.v. “DJA'FAR AL-SADIK.”

3. The Ja'fari madhhab excluded those aspects of Shi'i law (fiqh) which were abhorrent to Sunnis, such as temporary marriage (mut'ah), but retained the details of the systematic application of Shi'i jurisprudence (furū'āt-i shar'īyah) that were not offensive to them.

4. Lockhart, Laurence, Nadir Shah (London: Luzac, 1938), 279, 271Google Scholar.

5. Schmidt, A. E., “Iz istorii Sunnitsko-Shiitskikh otnoshenii,” in Schmidt, A. E. and Betger, E. K., eds., “'Iqd al-jumān“: V. V. Bartol'du Turkestanskie druz'ya ucheniki i pochitateli (Tashkent: Tipo-Litografiya Kazgiza, 1927), 105Google Scholar.

6. Sha'bani, Riza, “Siyāsat-i madhhabī-yi Nādir Shāh Afshār,” Vaḥīd 7 (1349 Sh./1970): 1132–56Google Scholar. For another view that fundamentally agrees with Sha'bani's thesis about the political nature of Nadir's policy see Gürsoy, Emine, “An Analysis of Nadir Shah's Religious Policy,” Boĝaziçi Üniversitesi Dergisi 2 (1974): 13–18Google Scholar.

7. Amoretti, B. S., “Religion in the Timurid and Safavid Periods,” in Jackson, Peter and Lockhart, Laurence, eds., The Cambridge History of Iran (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 6:655Google Scholar.

8. Algar, Hamid, “Shi'ism and Iran in the Eighteenth Century,” in Naff, Thomas and Owen, Roger, eds., Studies in Eighteenth Century Islamic History (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977), 291Google Scholar.

9. Nasiri, Muhammad Riza, ed., Asnād va mukātabāt-i tārīkhī-yi Īrān, vol. 1: Dawrahyi Afshārīyah (Tehran: Nima, 1364 Sh./1985), 206Google Scholar.

10. Lockhart, Nadir Shah, 60Google Scholar.

11. “Lā fatā’ ilia ‘Alī, lā sayfah illā Dhu'l-Fiqār, Nādir-i ‘aṣram zi luṭf-i ḥaqq, ghulām-i hasht u chār” (Sha'bani, Riza, Tārīkh-i ijtimā'ī-yi Īrān dar ‘aṣr-i Afshārīyah, 2 vols. [Tehran: Khushah, 1365 Sh./1986], 1:375)Google Scholar.

12. Floor, Willem, Ḥukūmat-i Nādir Shāh (Tehran: Tus, 1368 Sh./1989), 73Google Scholar.

13. Astarabadi, Mirza Muhammad Mahdi Khan, Tārīkh-i jahāngushā-yi Nādirī, ed. ‘Abdullah Anvar, Sayyid (Tehran: Bahman, 1341 Sh./1962), 269Google Scholar.

14. Such popular manifestations of piety as sabb, in addition to affirming distinctive aspects of Shi'i belief, also helped mobilize public sentiment in favor of the Safavids as defenders of Twelver Shi'ism. Thus, elimination of such rituals would mark not just a change in the expression of religious identity in Iran, but also the end of a potent symbol of dynastic and political allegiance. Given that the Safavids themselves, though, had agreed to refrain from sabb in two peace agreements with the Ottomans, in 998/1590 and 1049/1639, Nadir's proposal to eradicate it signaled less of a departure from actual Safavid precedent, at least in the foreign sphere, than his criticism of them in this speech would suggest. See Ramazani, R. K., The Foreign Policy of Iran, 15001–1941 (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1966), 18–19Google Scholar; Uzunçarşili, I. H., Osmanh tarihi, 8 vols. (Ankara: Turk Tarih Kurumu, 1983), 3:1:206Google Scholar. Some theologians, such as Shaykh Yusuf al-Bahrani, a prominent Akhbari Shi'i scholar from Bahrayn who spent part of his career in Shiraz in the early 1150s/late 1730s, even argued that Shi'i doctrine forbade sabb. See Kohlberg, Etan, “Aspects of Akhbari Thought in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries,” in Levtzion, Nehemia and Voll, John, eds., Eighteenth-Century Renewal and Reform in Islam (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1987), 148Google Scholar.

15. Nasiri, Asnād va mukātabāt, 82Google Scholar.

16. Ibid., 88.

17. Koca Ragib Paşa, “Tahkik ve tevfik,” in Inşaat-i Ragib Paşa, MS Topkapi Sarayi Kutuphanesi Yeni Yazmalari 763, 11 lr—113r.

18. Ibid., 154r.

19. Ibid., 156r.

20. See the text of this document in Quddusi, Muhammad Husayn, Nādirnāmah (Mashhad: Chapkhanah-yi Khurasan, 1339 Sh./1960), 540Google Scholar.

21. See, for example, the coinage of Mahmud and Ashraf, the Sunni Ghalzay Afghan monarchs of Iran, in Rabino, H. L., Coins, Medals and Seals of the Shahs of Iran (London: n.p., 1910), 48–50Google Scholar.

22. “Nigīn-i dawlat u dīn raftah būd chun az jā/bi-nām-i Nādir Īrān qarār dād khudā 1148 [1736]” (ibid., 52).

23. See Malayiri's, Muhammad summary of Hazin's account in Nādir Shāh (Tehran: Intisharat-i Bunyad, 1357 Sh./1978), 153Google Scholar.

24. Nava'i, ‘Abd al-Husayn, ed., Nādir Shāh va bāzmāndagānash: hamrāh bā nāmahhā-yi salṭanatī va asnād-i siyāsī va idārī (Tehran: Intisharat-i Zarrin, 1368 Sh./1989), 480–81Google Scholar.

25. Lockhart, Nadir Shah, 197Google Scholar, 233, n. 1. Nadir also visited the tomb of Abu Hanifah during his 1156/1743 Iraqi campaign, perhaps as a gesture to both the Ottomans and his Sunni followers.

26. For a list of the gifts he sent them, see Nava'i, Nādir Shāh, 303–4Google Scholar.

27. Arşivi, Başbakanlik, Istanbul, Mühimme defteri 142: 227Google Scholar, 243.

28. Husayn al-Suwaydi, ‘Abdullah b., al-Ḥujaj al-qaṭ'īyah li-ittifāq al-firaq alIslāmīyah (Cairo: al-Matba'ah al-Halabiyah, 1905)Google Scholar.

29. Ibid., 5.

30. Ibid., 11.

31. Ibid., 17, quoting Qur'an 5:58.

32. Al-Suwaydi, al-Ḥujaj al-qaṭ'iyah, 18–20Google Scholar. Al-Suwaydi included a detailed list of the participants, who represented the major ulama of Iran, Afghanistan, and Transoxiana. Of the Iranian participants, only one, Sayyid Ahmad of Ardalan, was a Sunni. Like al-Suwaydi, he was a Shafi'i.

33. Ibid., 19–20.

34. Ibid., 19.

35. Ibid., 20. This statement contradicted ‘Ali Akbar's earlier assertions about Muhammad's designation of ‘Ali as his successor (see above).

36. Ibid. Moojan Momen observes that the Akhbari school of Shi'i theology adopted an “almost-Ash'ari” approach to theology, so ‘Ali Akbar's statement might be evidence of an Akhbari orientation among some of Nadir's ulama. See Momen, An Introduction to Shi'i Islam (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985), 222Google Scholar.

37. Al-Suwaydi, al-Ḥujaj al-qaṭ'īyah, 21Google Scholar.

38. Ibid., 20–21.

39. Ibid., 23–5. A more complete Persian version of the Najaf document appears in Khan, Mahdi, Tārīkh, 388–94Google Scholar. Another complete version of the text can be found in Iqbal, ‘Abbas, “Vaīqah-yi ittiḥād-i Islām-i Nādirī,” Yādgār 6 (1326 Sh.,/1947): 43–55Google Scholar.

40. Al-Suwaydi, al-Ḥujaj al-qaṭ'īyah, 22Google Scholar; Khan, Mahdi, Tārīkh, 392Google Scholar; Iqbal, “Vaīqah,” 52Google Scholar.

41. “Humā imāmān ‘ādilān qāsiṭān kāna ‘alā al-ḥaqq, wa māta ‘alā al-ḥaqq” (al-Suwaydi, al-Ḥujaj al-qaṭ'īyah, 23)Google Scholar. See also Khan, Mahdi, Tārīkh, 393Google Scholar; Iqbal, “Vaīqah,” 52Google Scholar.

42. It is said that the same words were used by a woman to insult the Umayyad governor of Iraq, al-Hajjaj b. Yusuf (41–95/661–714), but that she was spared when he interpreted them with their positive meaning. Al-qāsiṭūn was also used to refer to the followers of Mu'awiyah at the battle of Siffin (37/657). See Lane, E. W., Arabic-English Lexicon, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society, 1984)Google Scholar, 1975, 2523.

43. Al-Suwaydi, al-Ḥujaj al-qaṭ'īyah, 24Google Scholar.

44. Ibid., 27.

45. Ibid., 28.

46. Ibid.

47. Khan, Mahdi, Tārīkh, 418Google Scholar.

48. For the text of the Treaty of Erzurum, which in fact explicitly stated that its basis was the 1159/1746 treaty, see Hurewitz, J. C., The Middle East and North Africa in World Politics, 3 vols. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975), 1:219–21Google Scholar.

49. See, for example, Shahrukh's coins, which resumed the Safavid practice of including the names of the Twelve Imams (Rabino, Coins, 55–6Google Scholar).

50. Efendi, Tanburi Arutin, Tahmas Kulu Han'in Tevarihi, ed. Uras, Esat (Ankara: Turk Tarih Kurumu Basimevi, 1942), 43–6Google Scholar.

51. Ibid., 44.

52. Marvi, Muhammad Kazim, Tārīkh-i ‘ālam-ārā-yi Nādirī, ed. Riyahi, Muhammad Amin, 3 vols. (Tehran: Naqsh-i Jahan, 1364 Sh./1985), 982Google Scholar.

53. For an analysis of Marvi's view of Nadir's relationship to the Safavids, see Ernest Tucker, “Explaining Nadir Shah: Kingship and Royal Legitimacy in Muhammad Kazim Marvi's Tārīkh-i ‘ālam-ārā-yi Nādirī,” Iranian Studies 26, nos. 1–2 (1993): 95–115.

54. Kirimli Rahim Efendi, Sefaretname-i Kesriyeli Ahmet Paşa, MS Topkapi Sarayi Kütüphanesi Hazinesi 1635.

55. For a recent Persian translation and discussion of this work, see Riyahi, Muhammad Amin, Safāratnāmahhā-yi Īrān (Tehran: Tus, 1368 Sh./1989)Google Scholar,

56. Efendi, Rahim, Sefaretname, 44r–44vGoogle Scholar.

57. Mar'ashi Safavi, Mirza Khalil, Majma’ al-tawārīkh, ed. Iqbal, ‘Abbas (Tehran: Tahuri, 1362 Sh./1984), 84Google Scholar.

58. Qazvini, Abu'l-Hasan, Fawā'id al-Ṣafavīyah, ed. Mir-Ahmadi, Maryam (Tehran: Mu'assasah-yi Mutala'at va Tahqiqat-i Farhangi, 1367 Sh./1988), 153–4Google Scholar.

59. Muhammad Baqir b. Zayn al-'Abidin al-Khwansari, Rawḍāt al-jannāt (Tehran: Nasir-i Khusraw, 1340 Sh./1961), 1:190Google Scholar.

60. Algar, “Shi'ism and Iran,” 298Google Scholar.