Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:04:13.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generic universalism in world politics: beyond international anarchy and the world state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

Sergei Prozorov
Sergei Prozorov*
Affiliation:
Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland
*
Email: sergei.prozorov@helsinki.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Even though the notion of ‘world politics’ has become increasingly widespread in the discipline of International Relations, its deployment in the disciplinary discourse has been highly problematic. This article argues that the impasse of the discourse on world politics is owing to its commitment to a political ontology of identitarian pluralism, most forcefully articulated in the work of Carl Schmitt, which limits the political imagination to the binary opposition of the preservation of international anarchy and its hierarchical domestication in the world state. As long as politics is cast in identitarian terms, it is impossible to conceive of the universal dimension of political praxis other than in terms of the universalization of some particular content, i.e. as a hegemonic project. We shall then outline the pathway towards a non-identitarian understanding of world politics through an engagement with the universalist themes in the philosophy of Alain Badiou and Giorgio Agamben. We shall reconstitute the authors’ alternative to identity politics that rehabilitates the notion of universalism from ‘postmodern’ criticism and reconstructs the category of the universal in non-identitarian or generic terms of indiscernibility and ‘whatever being’. The paper concludes with a discussion of the practical dimension of generic world politics as a radically egalitarian process of the emergence of the world community of ‘whatever singularities’.

Keywords

universalismanarchysovereigntySchmittAgambenBadiou
Type
Original Article
Information
International Theory , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , July 2009 , pp. 215 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, G. (1991), Language and Death, Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, G (1993), The Coming Community, Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, G (1995), The Idea of Prose, New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, G (1998), Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, G (1999), Potentialities, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, G (2000), Means without End: Notes on Politics, Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, G (2007), Profanations, New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Badiou, A. (1996), ‘What is love?’, Umbr(a) 1: 37–53.Google Scholar
Badiou, A (2001), Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Badiou, A (2003a), St. Paul: The Foundation of Universalism, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Badiou, A (2003b), Theoretical Writings, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Badiou, A (2003c), ‘The scene of two’, Lacanian Ink 21: 42–55.Google Scholar
Badiou, A (2005a), Being and Event, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Badiou, A (2005b), Metapolitics, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Badiou, A (2006), ‘Bodies, language, truths’, Lecture delivered at the Victoria College of Arts, University of Melbourne, available at: http://www.lacan.com/badbodies.htmGoogle Scholar
Badiou, A (2007a), ‘A musical variant of the metaphysics of the subject’, Parrhesia 2: 29–36.Google Scholar
Badiou, A (2007b), The Century, London: Polity.Google Scholar
Bartelson, J. (1998), ‘Second natures: is the state identical with itself?’, European Journal of International Relations 4(3): 295–326.Google Scholar
Bartelson, J (2001), The Critique of the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calarco, M.DeCaroli, S. (eds) (2007), On Agamben: Sovereignty and Life, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cristi, R. (1998), Carl Schmitt and Authoritarian Liberalism, Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G.Guattari, F. (1994), What is Philosophy?, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1995), The Gift of Death, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J (1996), Politics of Friendship, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Derrida, J (1999), Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J (2001), On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franchi, S. (2004), ‘Passive politics’, Contretemps 5: 30–41.Google Scholar
Guzzini, S. (2004), ‘The enduring dilemmas of realism in international relations’, European Journal of International Relations 10(4): 533–568.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1979), Phenomenology of Spirit, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kervegan, J.-F. (1999), ‘Carl Schmitt and “World Unity” ’, in C. Mouffe (ed.), The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, London: Verso, pp. 54–74.Google Scholar
Kojève, A. (1969), Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kojève, A (2001), ‘Alexandre Kojève–Carl Schmitt correspondence and “colonialism from a European perspective” ’, Interpretation 29(1): 91–130.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (1996), Emancipation(s), London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, E.Mouffe, C. (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (1969), Totality and Infinity, Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, J. (1997), Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. (1955), Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. (1999), ‘Carl Schmitt and the paradox of liberal democracy’, in C. Mouffe (ed.), The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, London: Verso, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C (2000), The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Norris, A. (ed.) (2005), Politics, Metaphysics and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben’s Homo Sacer, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Odysseos, L.Petito, F. (eds) (2007), The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ojakangas, M. (2003), ‘Carl Schmitt’s real enemy: the citizen of a non-exclusive democratic community’, The European Legacy 8(4): 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojakangas, M (2004), A Philosophy of Concrete Life: Carl Schmitt and the Political Thought of Late Modernity, Jyvaskyla: Sophi.Google Scholar
Prozorov, S. (2005), ‘X/Xs: toward a general theory of the exception’, Alternatives 30(1): 81–112.Google Scholar
Prozorov, S (2006a), ‘Liberal enmity: the figure of the foe in the political ontology of liberalism’, Millennium 35(1): 75–100.Google Scholar
Prozorov, S (2006b), Understanding Conflict between Russia and the EU: the Limits of Integration, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prozorov, S (2007a), Foucault, Freedom and Sovereignty, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Prozorov, S (2007b), ‘The ethos of insecure life’, in L. Odysseos and F. Petito (eds), The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt, London: Routledge, pp. 222–241.Google Scholar
Prozorov, S (2008a), ‘Belonging and inclusion in European–Russian relations: Alain Badiou and the truth of Europe’, Journal of International Relations and Development 11(2): 181–207.Google Scholar
Prozorov, S (2008b), ‘Russian postcommunism and the end of history’, Studies in East European Thought 60(3): 207–230.Google Scholar
Ranciere, J. (1995), On the Shores of Politics, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Ranciere, J (2007), Hatred of Democracy, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Rasch, W. (2000), ‘Conflict as a vocation: Carl Schmitt and the possibility of politics’, Theory, Culture and Society 17(6): 1–32.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, W. (1999), Carl Schmitt: The End of Law, Boulder: Roman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1976), The Concept of the Political, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C (1987), ‘The legal world revolution’, Telos 72: 73–89.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C (1988), Glossarium, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C (1999), ‘Ethic of state and pluralistic state’, in C. Mouffe (ed.), The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, London: Verso, pp. 195–208.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C (2003), The Nomos of the Earth in the International Public Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, New York: Telos Press.Google Scholar
Sims, J. (2005), ‘Absolute adversity: Schmitt, Levinas and the possibility of killing’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 31(2): 223–252.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (1976), ‘Comments on Carl Schmitt’s Der Begriff Des Politischen’, in C. Schmitt, The Concept of the Political, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp. 81–105.Google Scholar
Toscano, A. (2006), ‘The Bourgeois and the Islamist, or, the other subjects of politics’, Cosmos and History 2(1–2): 15–38.Google Scholar
Walker, R.B.J. (1993), Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, R.B.J (1995), ‘From international relations to world politics’, in J. Camilleri, A. Jarvis and A. Paolini (eds), The State in Transition: Reimagining Political Space, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Waltz, K. (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (2003), ‘Why a world state is inevitable’, European Journal of International Relations 9(4): 491–542.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2008), ‘Event or exception?: disentangling Badiou from Schmitt, or, towards a politics of the void’, Theory and Event 11(2), available at http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_eventGoogle Scholar
Zizek, S. (1999), ‘Carl Schmitt in the age of post-politics’, in C. Mouffe (ed.), The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, London: Verso, pp. 18–37.Google Scholar
Zizek, S (2006), The Parallax View, Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar