Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T08:28:43.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

World Bank Environmental Reform: Revisiting Lessons from Agency Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2005

Tamar Gutner
Tamar Gutner
Affiliation:
American University's School of International Service, Washington, D.C., tgutner@american.edu
Get access

Extract

Daniel Nielson and Michael Tierney's article, “Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform” (International Organization, Spring 2003), makes a strong argument for ways in which principal-agent (P-A) models advance theoretical explanations of the behavior and performance of international organizations (IOs). Most IOs suffer from widely recognized gaps between their mandates and their performance, gaps not well explained by the major theories in our field. P-A models are premised on the assumption that performance problems naturally arise when one actor (the principal) delegates to another actor (the agent) the authority to act in the former's interests. The models seek to explain why and how the divergence of interests between the two parties may result in the agent's actions differing from the principal's intentions, how agents may be better controlled, and the costs of doing so.I would like to thank Barbara Connolly, Martha Finnemore, Jeffry Frieden, Dan Guttman, Patrick Jackson, Carmela Lutmar, and Melissa Moye for helpful comments.

Type
COMMENT AND RESPONSE
Information
International Organization , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , July 2005 , pp. 773 - 783
Copyright
© 2005 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Caulfield, Catherine. 1996. Masters of Illusion: The World Bank and the Poverty of Nations. New York: Henry Holt.
Cooley, Alexander, and James Ron. 2002. The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action. International Security 27 (1):5–39.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash. 2000. IMF Programs as Incentive Mechanisms. Department of Economics, Princeton University. 〈http://www.princeton.edu/∼dixitak/home/index.html〉. Accessed 10 March 2005.
Drazen, Alan. 2002. Conditionality and Ownership in IMF Lending: A Political Economy Approach. IMF Staff Papers 49: 36–67.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan A. 2002. The World Bank Inspection Panel and the Limits of Accountability. In Reinventing the World Bank, edited by Jonathan R. Pincus and Jeffrey A. Winters, 131–63. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Gould, Erica. 2003. When IOs Influence Each Other: Has the World Bank Expanded Fund Conditionality? Paper Presented at the 99th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August, Philadelphia.
Gutner, Tamar. 2002. Banking on the Environment: Multilateral Development Banks and their Environmental Performance in Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Gutner, Tamar. 2005. Explaining the Gaps Between Mandate and Performance: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform. Global Environmental Politics 5 (2):10–37.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2001. Conditionality in Fund-Supported Programs: Policy Issues. Policy Development and Review Department. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
Khan, Mohsin S., and Suni Sharma. 2003. IMF Conditionality and Country Ownership of Adjustment Programs. World Bank Research Observer 18 (2):227–48.Google Scholar
Killick, Tony. 1997. Principals, Agents and the Failings of Conditionality. Journal of International Development 9 (4):483–95.Google Scholar
Lele, Uma, Nalini Kumar, Syed Arif Husain, Aaron Zazueta, and Lauren Kelly. 2000. The World Bank Forest Strategy: Striking the Right Balance. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Lovei, Magda. 2003. Environmental Lending at the World Bank. MFI Working Group in the Environment. World Bank Powerpoint presentation.
Martens, Bertin. 2002. Introduction. In The Institutional Economics of Foreign Aid, edited by Bertin Martens, Uwe Mummert, Peter Murrell, and Paul Seabright, 1–33. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Morse, Bradford, and Thomas Berger. 1992. Sardar Sarovar: Report of the Independent Review. Ottawa, Canada: Resources Future International.
Murrell, Peter. 2002. The Interaction of Donors, Contractors, and Recipients in Implementing Aid for Institutional Reform. In The Institutional Economics of Foreign Aid, edited by Bertin Martens, Uwe Mummert, Peter Murrell, and Paul Seabright, 69–111. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nielson, Daniel L., and Michael J. Tierney. 2003. Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform. International Organization 57 (2):241–76.Google Scholar
Pietrobelli, Carlo, and Carlo Scarpa. 1992. Inducing Efficiency in the Use of Foreign Aid: The Case for Incentive Mechanisms. Journal of Development Studies 29 (1):72–92.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. 1997. Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community. International Organization 51 (1):99–134.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. 2003. The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rich, Bruce. 1994. Mortgaging the Earth: The World Bank, Environmental Impoverishment, and the Crisis of Development. Boston: Beacon Press.
Rich, Bruce. 2002. The World Bank Under James Wolfensohn. In Reinventing the World Bank, edited by Jonathan R. Pincus and Jeffrey A. Winters, 26–53. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Udall, Lori. 1998. The World Bank and Public Accountability: Has Anything Changed? In The Struggle for Accountability: the World Bank, NGOs, and Grassroots Movements, edited by Jonathan A. Fox and L. David Brown, 391–436. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Wade, Robert Hunter. 1997. Greening the Bank: The Struggle over the Environment, 1970–1995. In The World Bank: Its First Half Century, Vol. 2., edited by Devesh Kapur, John P. Lewis, and Richard Webb, 611–736. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Wapenhans, Willi A. 1991. Effective Implementation: Key to Development Impact. Portfolio Management Task Force. Confidential Report of the World Bank, 22 September.
World Bank. 1996. Effectiveness of Environmental Assessments and National Environmental Action Plans. Operations Evaluation Department Report 15835. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
World Bank. 2002. Promoting Environmental Sustainability in Development: An Evaluation of the World Bank's Performance. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
World Bank. 2003. The World Bank Annual Report. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
World Bank. 2004. The World Bank Annual Report. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
World Rainforest Movement. 2002. The World Bank in the Forest. Available from 〈http://www.wrm.org.uy〉. Accessed 21 April 2005.