Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Right to Dominate: How Old Ideas About Sovereignty Pose New Challenges for World Order

  • Roland Paris


A principal theme of international relations scholarship following the Cold War was the apparent erosion of state sovereignty caused by globalization's integrative effects and the proliferation of international institutions and networks. In recent years, however, scholars have noted a reverse trend: the reassertion of traditional, or Westphalian, state sovereignty. By contrast, I highlight another recent trend that has gone largely overlooked: the reaffirmation of older “extralegal” and “organic” versions of sovereignty by three of the world's most powerful states—Russia, China, and the United States. After tracing the genealogy of these older concepts, I consider how and why they have gained prominence in the official discourse of all three countries. I also explore the implications of this shift, which not only illustrates the importance of “norm retrieval” in international affairs, but also raises questions about the foundations of international order. Contrary to Westphalian sovereignty, which emphasizes the legal equality of states and the principle of noninterference in domestic affairs, the extralegal and organic versions offer few constraints on state action. If anything, they appear to license powerful states to dominate others.



Hide All
Arase, David. 2016. The Question for Regional Order in East Asia. In China's Rise and Changing Order in East Asia, edited by Arase, David, 334. Palgrave Macmillan.
Auer, Stefan. 2015. Carl Schmitt in the Kremlin: The Ukraine Crisis and the Return of Geopolitics. International Affairs 91 (5):953–68.
Barkin, J. Samuel, and Cronin, Bruce. 1994. The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations. International Organization 48 (1):107–30.
Bertram, Christopher. 2012. Rousseau's Legacy in Two Conceptions of the General Will: Democratic and Transcendent. Review of Politics 74 (3):403–19.
Bos, Wilfred, and Tarnai, Christian. 1999. Content Analysis in Empirical Social Research. International Journal of Educational Research 31 (8):659–71.
Bukovansky, Mlada, Clark, Ian, Eckersley, Robyn, Price, Richard, Reus-Smit, Christian, and Wheeler, Nicholas. 2012. Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power. Cambridge University Press.
Callahan, William A. 2016. China's Belt and Road Initiative and the New Eurasian Order. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Policy Brief No. 22. Available at <>.
Carothers, Thomas. 2016. Closing Space for International Democracy and Human Rights Support. Journal of Human Rights Practice 8 (3):358–77.
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antionia Handler. 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Harvard University Press.
I. Bernard, Cohen. 1997. The Body Politic Before and After the Scientific Revolution. In Experiencing Nature: Proceedings of a Conference in Honor of Allen G. Debus, edited by Theerman, Paul H. and Parshall, Karen Hunger, 144. Kluwer.
Cooper, Robert. 1996. The Post-modern State and the World Order. Demos.
Cox, Michael. 2017. The Rise of Populism and the Crisis of Globalisation: Brexit, Trump and Beyond. Irish Studies in International Affairs 28:917.
Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Zimmermann, Lisbeth. 2019. Norms under Challenge: Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness. Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (1):217.
Spiegeleire, De, Stephan, Clarissa Skinner, and Sweijs, Tim. 2017. The Rise of Populist Sovereignism. Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.
Deyermond, Ruth. 2016. The Uses of Sovereignty in Twenty-first Century Russian Foreign Policy. Europe-Asia Studies 68 (6):957–84.
Dian, Matteo, and Menegazzi, Silvia. 2018. New Regional Initiatives in China's Foreign Policy: The Incoming Pluralism of Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Downe-Wamboldt, Barbara. 1992. Content Analysis: Method, Applications, and Issues. Health Care for Women International 13 (3):313–21.
Dragneva, Rilka, and Wolczuk, Kataryna. 2017. The Eurasian Economic Union Deals, Rules and the Exercise of Power. Chatham House, 2 May. Available at <> .
Dreyer, June Teufel. 2015. The “Tianxia Trope”: Will China Change the International System? Journal of Contemporary China 24 (96):1015–31.
Dunn, Kevin C. 2008. Discourse Analysis. In Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, edited by Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, 7992. Palgrave Macmillan.
Economy, Elizabeth C. 2017. History with Chinese Characteristics. Foreign Affairs 96 (4):141–48.
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge.
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham L.. 2019. Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security 44 (1):4279.
Ferdinand, Peter. 2016. Westward Ho—The China Dream and “One Belt, One Road.” International Affairs 92 (4):941–57.
Finkel, Evgeny, and Brudny, Yitzhak M.. 2012. Russia and the Colour Revolutions. Democratization 19 (1):1536.
Finnemore, Martha. 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Cornell University Press.
Finnemore, Martha. 2009. Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole Isn't All It's Cracked up to Be. World Politics 61 (1):5885.
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.
Fish, M. Steven. 2018. What Has Russia Become? Comparative Politics 50 (3):327–46.
Fitzgerald, John. 2018. China in Xi's “New Era”: Overstepping Down Under. Journal of Democracy 29 (2):5967.
Ford, Christopher A. 2010. The Mind of Empire: China's History and Modern Foreign Relations. University Press of Kentucky.
Fravel, M. Taylor. 2009. Strong Borders, Secure Nation: Cooperation and Conflict in China's Territorial Disputes. Princeton University Press.
French, Howard W. 2017. Everything Under the Heavens: How the Past Helps Shape China's Push for Global Power. Knopf.
Goldsmith, Jack. 2000. Review: Sovereignty, International Relations Theory, and International Law. Stanford Law Review 52 (4):95–86.
Gong, Garrit W. 1984. The Standard of Civilization in International Society. Clarendon.
Gonzalez-Vincente, Ruben. 2017. The Empire Strikes Back? China's New Racial Sovereignty. Political Geography 59:139–41.
Grant, Thomas D. 2015. Annexation of Crimea. American Journal of International Law 109 (1):6895.
Gunitsky, Seva. 2016. Great Powers and Norm Cascades in Global Politics. Working paper, University of Toronto (September).
Hassner, Ron E., and Wittenberg, Jason. 2015. Barriers to Entry: Who Builds Fortified Boundaries and Why? International Security 40 (1):157–90.
Headley, James. 2015. Russia's Complex Engagement with European Union Norms: Sovereign Democracy Versus Post-Westphalianism? In Importing EU Norms: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings, edited by Björkdahl, Annika, Chaban, Natalia, Leslie, John, and Masselot, Annick, 211–29. Springer.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1942. Philosophy of Right, translated by Knox, T.M.. Clarendon.
Held, David. 2002. Law of States, Law of Peoples: Three Models of Sovereignty. Legal Theory 8 (1):144.
Hicks, Ruth Ilsley. 1963. The Body Political and the Body Ecclesiastical. Journal of Bible and Religion 31 (1):2935.
Hill, Fiona, and Gaddy, Clifford G.. 2013. Mr. Putin: Operative in the Kremlin. Brookings Institution Press.
Hinsley, F.H. 1986. Sovereignty. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes, Thomas. 2004. Leviathan: Or the Matter, Forme, and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill. Barnes and Noble Books.
Hopgood, Stephen. 2013. The Endtimes of Human Rights. Cornell University Press.
Hudson, Wayne. 2008. Fables of Sovereignty. In Re-envisioning Sovereignty: The End of Westphalia? edited by Jacobsen, Trudy, 1931. Routledge.
Hurrell, Andrew. 2013. Effective Multilateralism and Global Order. In Effective Multilateralism: Through the Looking Glass of East Asia, edited by Prantl, Jochen, 2142. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ihalainen, Pasi. 2009. Towards an Immortal Political Body: The State Machine in Eighteenth-Century English Political Discourse. Contributions to the History of Concepts 5 (1):447.
Ikenberry, John G. 2011. Liberal Leviathan. Princeton University Press.
Ingerbritsen, Christine. 2002. Norm Entrepreneurs: Scandinavia's Role in World Politics. Cooperation and Conflict 37 (1):1123.
Jackson, Robert. 1999. Introduction: Sovereignty at the Millennium. Political Studies 47 (3):423–30.
Jackson, Robert. 2007. Sovereignty: Evolution of an Idea. Cambridge University Press.
John of Salisbury. 1990. Policraticus: Of the Frivolities of Courtiers and the Footprints of Philosophers, edited and translated by Nederman, C.J.. Cambridge University Press.
Kallis, Aristotle. 2018. Populism, Sovereigntism, and the Unlikely Re-Emergence of the Territorial Nation-State. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 11 (3):285302.
Kalyvas, Andreas. 2000. Hegemonic Sovereignty: Carl Schmitt, Antonio Gramsci and the Constituent Prince. Journal of Political Ideologies 5 (3):343–76.
Kaufmann, Chaim D., and Pape, Robert A.. 1999. Explaining Costly International Moral Action: Britain's Sixty-Year Campaign Against the Atlantic Slave Trade. International Organization 53 (4):631–68.
Kim, Samuel S. 1979. China, the United Nations and World Order. Princeton University Press.
Kingsbury, Benedict. 1998. Sovereignty and Inequality. European Journal of International Law 9 (4):599625.
Kissinger, Henry. 2014. World Order. Penguin.
Klotz, Audie. 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid. Cornell University Press.
Koh, Harold Hongju. 2019. Is Trump's Assault on International Law Working? Oxford University Press blog, 11 March. Available at <>.
Kolin, Andrew. 2017. Politics Above Law: How Trump Channels Far Right Icon Carl Schmitt Without Knowing It. Informed Content blog, 5 September. Available at <>.
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.
Lake, David A. 2017. Domination, Authority, and the Forms of Chinese Power. Chinese Journal of International Politics 10 (4):357–82.
Langdon, Kate C., and Tismaneanu, Vladimir. 2019. Putin's Totalitarian Democracy: Ideology, Myth, and Violence in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan.
Laruelle, Marlene. 2015. The “Russian World”: Russia's Soft Power and Geopolitical Imagination. Center on Global Interests.
Lewis, David. 2017. Carl Schmitt in Moscow: Counter-Revolutionary Ideology and the Putinist State. Russian Analytical Digest 211:1315.
Lin, Shaun, Sidaway, James D., and Woon, Chih Yuan. 2019. Reordering China, Respacing the World: Belt and Road Initiative as an Emergent Geopolitical Culture. The Professional Geographer 71 (3):507–22.
Liu, Hong, and van Dongen, Els. 2016. China's Diaspora Policies as a New Mode of Transnational Governance. Journal of Contemporary China 25 (102):805–21.
MacWilliams, Matthew C. 2016. Who Decides When the Party Doesn't? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump. PS: Political Science and Politics 49 (4):716–21.
Mattern, Janice Bially, and Zarakol, Ayşe. 2016. Hierarchies in World Politics. International Organization 70 (3):623–54.
Mead, Walter Russell. 1999. The Jacksonian Tradition and American Foreign Policy. The National Interest 58:529.
Mead, Walter Russell. 2017. The Jacksonian Revolt. Foreign Affairs 96 (2):27.
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19 (3):549.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2018. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. Yale University Press.
Merriam, C.E. Jr. 2001. History of the Theory of Sovereignty Since Rousseau. Batoche Books.
Miller, Fred D. Jr. 2011. Aristotle's Political Naturalism. Apeiron 22 (4):195218.
Miskimmon, Alister, O'Loughlin, Ben, and Roselle, Laura. 2017. Introduction. In Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations, edited by Miskimmon, Alister, O'Loughlin, Ben, and Roselle, Laura, 122. University of Michigan Press.
Mohamed, Feisal G. 2018. “I Alone Can Solve”: Carl Schmitt on Sovereignty and Nationhood Under Trump. In Trump and Political Philosophy: Patriotism, Cosmopolitanism, and Civic Virtue, edited by Sable, Marc Benjamin and Torres, Angel Jaramillo, 293309. Palgrave Macmillan.
Morris, P. Sean. 2018. Russian Discourses on International Law: Sociological and Philosophical Phenomenon. Routledge.
Mutz, Diane C. 2018. Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (19):E4330–39.
Neu, Jerome. 1971. Plato's Analogy of State and Individual: The Republic and the Organic Theory of the State. Philosophy 46 (177):238–54.
Nymalm, Nicola, and Plagemann, Johannes. 2019. Comparative Exceptionalism: Universality and Particularity in Foreign Policy Discourses. International Studies Review 21 (1):1237.
Osiander, Andreas. 2001. Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth. International Organization 55 (2):251–87.
Owen, John M. IV, and Inboden, William. 2015. Putin, Ukraine, and the Question of Realism. The Hedgehog Review 17 (1):8796.
Paltiel, Jeremy T. 2007. The Empire's New Clothes: Cultural Particularism and Universal Value in China's Quest for Global Status. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pennington, Keith. 1988. Law, Legislative Authority, and Theories of Government, 1150–1300. In The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350—c.1450, edited by Burns, J., 424–53. Cambridge University Press.
Pennington, Keith. 2007. Politics in Western Jurisprudence. In The Jurists’ Philosophy of Law from Rome to the Seventeenth Century, edited by Padovani, A. and Stein, P.G., 157211. Springer.
Pettit, Philip. 2005. Liberty and Leviathan. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (1):131–51.
Phillips, Andrew. 2011. War, Religion and Empire: The Transformation of International Orders. Cambridge University Press.
Philpott, Daniel. 1995. Sovereignty: An Introduction and Brief History. Journal of International Affairs 48 (2):353–68.
Philpott, Daniel. 2001a. Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton University Press.
Philpott, Daniel. 2001b. Usurping the Sovereignty of Sovereignty? World Politics 53 (2):297324.
Posen, Barry R. 2017. Civil Wars and the Structure of World Power. Daedalus 146 (4):167–79.
Posen, Barry R. 2018. The Rise of Illiberal Hegemony: Trump's Surprising Grand Strategy. Foreign Affairs 97 (2):2027.
Posner, Eric A. 2017. Liberal Internationalism and the Populist Backlash. Arizona State Law Journal 49 (Special Issue):795819.
Prakash, Saikrishna B., and Ramsey, Michael D.. 2001. The Executive Power Over Foreign Affairs. Yale Law Journal 111 (2):231356.
Puranen, Matti. 2020. A Non-World: Chinese Perceptions of the Western International Order. In Contestations of Liberal Order: The West in Crisis? edited by Lehti, Marko, Pennanen, Henna-Riikka, and Jouhki, Jukka, 315–41. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Putin, Vladimir. 1999. The Modern Russia: Economic and Social Problems, 31 December. Reprinted in Vital Speeches of the Day 66 (8):231–36.
Ramos, Jennifer M. 2013. Changing Norms Through Actions: The Evolution of Sovereignty. Oxford University Press.
Reeves, Jeffrey. 2018. Imperialism and the Middle Kingdom: The Xi Jinping Administration's Peripheral Diplomacy with Developing States. Third World Quarterly 39 (5):976–98.
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton University Press.
Ruggie, John Gerald. 1993. Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization 47 (1):139–74.
Rutzen, Douglas. 2015. Authoritarianism Goes Global (II): Civil Society Under Assault. Journal of Democracy 26 (4):2839.
Sassen, Saskia. 1996. Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. Columbia University Press.
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1):4780.
Schmitt, Carl. 1985. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, translated by George Schwab. MIT Press.
Sharafutdinova, Gulnaz. 2017. Managing National Ressentiment: Morality Politics in Putin's Russia. In Vocabularies of International Relations after the Crisis in Ukraine, edited by Makarychev, Andrey and Yatsyk, Alexandra, 130–51. Routledge.
Shirk, Susan L. 2018. The Return to Personalist Rule. Journal of Democracy 29 (2):2236.
Smith, Stephen N. 2019. Harmonizing the Periphery: China's Neighborhood Strategy Under Xi Jinping. Pacific Review. Available at <>.
Snow, David A., Burke Rochford, E. Jr., Worden, Steven K., and Benford, Robert D.. 1986. Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review 51 (4):464–81.
Sørensen, Georg. 1999. Sovereignty: Change and Continuity in a Fundamental Institution. Political Studies 47 (3):590604.
Spiro, Peter J. 2019. Trump v. Hawaii. American Journal of International Law 113 (1):109–16.
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton University Press.
Surkov, Vladislav. 2014. Russian Political Culture: The View From Utopia. Russian Politics and Law 46 (5):8197.
Swidler, Anne. 1986. Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review 51 (2): 273–86.
Tsygankov, Andrei. 2016. Crafting the State-Civilization: Vladimir Putin's Turn to Distinct Values. Problems of Post-Communism 63 (3):146–58.
Thunø, Mette. 2017. China's New Global Position: Changing Policies Toward the Chinese Diaspora in the Twenty-First Century. In China's Rise and the Chinese Overseas, edited by Wong, Bernard and Tan, Chee-Beng, 184208. Routledge.
Van Creveld, Martin L. 1999. The Rise and Decline of the State. Cambridge University Press.
Veg, Sebastian. 2019. The Rise of China's Statist Intellectuals: Law, Sovereignty, and “Repoliticization.” The China Journal 82:2345.
Watson, Adam. 1987. Hedley Bull, States Systems and International Societies. Review of International Studies 13 (2):147–53.
Weller, Marc. 2010. Iraq and the Use of Force in International Law. Oxford University Press.
Wilks, Michael. 1963. The Problem of Sovereignty in the Later Middle Ages: The Papal Monarchy with Augustinus Triumphus and the Publicists. Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, Jeanne L. 2017. The Russian Pursuit of Regional Hegemony. Rising Powers Quarterly 2 (1):725.
Wilson, William A. 1973. Herder, Folklore and Romantic Nationalism. Journal of Popular Culture 6 (4):819–35.
Woodward, Bob. 2018. Fear: Trump in the White House. Simon and Schuster.
Jinping, Xi. 2012. Achieving Rejuvenation Is the Dream of the Chinese People (29 November), reproduced in Xi Jinping, The Governance of China, vol. 1, 2014, 3739. Foreign Languages Press.
Jinping, Xi. 2014. The Rejuvenation of the Chinese Nation Is a Dream Shared by All Chinese, 6 June. Reproduced in Xi Jinping, The Governance of China, vol. 1, 69–17. Foreign Languages Press.
Xu, Jilin. 2015. The New Tianxia: Rebuilding China's Internal and External Order, translated by Mark McConaghy, Tang Xiaobing, and David Ownby. Reading the Chinese Dream blog, 15 October, <>.
Zhang, Yongjin, and Buzan, Barry. 2012. The Tributary System as International Society in Theory and Practice. Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (1):336.
Zhang, Yongjin. 2008. Ambivalent Sovereignty: China and Re-Imagining the Westphalian Ideal. In Re-Envisioning Sovereignty: The End of Westphalia? edited by Jacobsen, Trudy, Sampford, Charles, and Thakur, Ramesh, 101–15. Ashgate.
Ziegler, Charles E. 2012. Conceptualizing Sovereignty in Russian Foreign Policy: Realist and Constructivist Perspectives. International Politics 49 (4):400–17.
Zhao, Tingyang. 2006. Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept “All-under-Heaven” (Tian-xia). Social Identities 12 (1):2941.
Zhao, Tingyang. 2019. Redefining a Philosophy for World Governance, translated by Tao, Liqing. Palgrave Macmillan.


The Right to Dominate: How Old Ideas About Sovereignty Pose New Challenges for World Order

  • Roland Paris


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.