Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:42:17.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The New Diplomacy and the Quest for Peace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Kenneth W. Thompson
Kenneth W. Thompson
Affiliation:
A member of the Board of Editors of International Organization, is Vice President of The Rockefeller Foundation
Get access

Extract

Parliamentary diplomacy in international organization has its roots in the movement toward “diplomacy by conference.” As early as 1928, Frederick S. Dunn could assert:

The rapidity with which the conference method has come to the forefront in the conduct of international intercourse is one of the most striking developments in the present era of world affairs. Within the space of a very few years, this method has almost entirely supplanted bilateral diplomatic negotiation in matters of interest to more than two or three nations.

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , Summer 1965 , pp. 394 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dunn, Frederick Sherwood, The Practice and Procedure of International Conferences (Baltimore, Md: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1929), p. vGoogle Scholar.

2 Rusk, Dean, “Parliamentary Diplomacy—Debate vs. Negotiation,” World Affairs Interpreter, Summer 1955 (Vol. 26, No. 2), pp. 121–122Google Scholar.

3 Nicolson, Harold, The Evolution of Diplomatic Method (New York: Macmillan, 1954), p. 65Google Scholar.

4 Jessup, Philip C., “Parliamentary Diplomacy,” Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International, 1956 (Vol. 89, No. 1), p. 235Google Scholar.

5 Vital Speeches of the Day, 05 15, 1949 (Vol. 15, No. 15), p. 465Google Scholar.

6 Quoted in Nicolson, p. 84.

7 Ibid., p. 90.

8 Jessup, , Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International, Vol. 89, No. 1, p. 56Google Scholar.

9 Lippmann, Walter, “The Great Revolution,” UN Monthly Chronicle, 04 1965 (Vol. 2, No. 4), p. 68Google Scholar.

10 Ibid.

11 Introduction to the Annual Report of the Secretary-General on the Work, of the Organization, 16 June 1959–15 June 1960 (General Assembly Official Records [15th session], Supplement No. 1A), p. 4Google Scholar.

12 Rusk, , World Affairs Interpreter, Vol. 26, No. 2, p. 125Google Scholar.

13 Ibid., p. 126.

14 Ibid.

15 Ibid., pp. 126–127.

16 Jenks, C. Wilfred, “Craftsmanship in International Law,” The American Journal of International Law, 01 1956 (Vol. 50, No. 1), p. 54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 “The Element of Privacy in Peace-Making: Text of an address by Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjold at Ohio University, Athens, Ohio,” United Nations Review, 03 1958 (Vol. 4, No. 9), p. 12Google Scholar.

18 Rusk, , World Affairs Interpreter, Vol. 26, No. 2, p. 137Google Scholar.

19 “The Element of Privacy in Peace-Making,” United Nations Review, Vol. 4, No. 9, p. 11.

20 Ibid.

21 Rusk, , World Affairs Interpreter, Vol. 26, No. 1, p. 137Google Scholar.

22 “The Element of Privacy in Peace-Making,” United Nations Review, Vol. 4, No. 9, p. 11.

23 Ibid., p. 12.

24 Ibid.

25 Ibid.

26 Spaak, Paul-Henri, “The Role of the General Assembly,” International Conciliation, 11 1948 (No. 445), p. 613Google Scholar.

27 Ibid.

28 Bailey, Sydney D., The Secretariat of the United Nations (Rev. ed.; New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1964), p. 42Google Scholar.

29 Ibid.

30 Ibid., p. 43.

31 Lippmann, Walter, The Stakes of Diplomacy (New York: Macmillan, 1915), p. 26Google Scholar.

32 Ibid., p. 29.

33 de Vattel, Emmerich, The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (first published in French in 1758)Google Scholar, Book III, Chapter XVI, section 235.

34 Nicholas, Herbert G., The United Nations as a Political Institution (London: Oxford University Press, 1959), p. 179Google Scholar.