Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Evolution of Territorial Conquest After 1945 and the Limits of the Territorial Integrity Norm

  • Dan Altman


Past studies conclude that a territorial integrity norm caused territorial conquest to decline sharply after 1945, virtually subsiding after 1975. However, using new and more comprehensive data on territorial conquest attempts, this study presents a revised history of conquest after 1945. Unlike attempts to conquer entire states, attempts to conquer parts of states remained far more common than previously recognized. More than conquest declined in frequency, its relationship with war evolved. Challengers attempting conquest before 1945 often initiated a war, then sought to occupy large territories. Today, challengers more often seize small regions, then attempt to avoid war. Adopting this strategy, the fait accompli, challengers increasingly came to target territories with characteristics that reduce the risk of provoking war—such as a low population and the absence of a defending military garrison—but challengers nonetheless take a calculated gamble. In part because seizures of smaller territories with such characteristics have not declined, the operative constraint appears to be against war-prone aggression, not territorial revision. The evolution of conquest is a symptom of war's decline, not its cause. Most of the evidence that the territorial integrity norm suppressed conquest or war withers under investigation with new data. Attempts to get away with seizing small pieces of territory are likely to be a defining element of the twenty-first-century international security landscape.



Hide All
Altman, Dan. 2017. By Fait Accompli, Not Coercion: How States Wrest Territory from Their Adversaries. International Studies Quarterly 61 (4):881–91.
Altman, Dan. 2018. Advancing Without Attacking: The Strategic Game Around the Use of Force. Security Studies 27 (1):5888.
Altman, Dan, and Lee, Melissa M.. 2019. The Causes of Modern Conquest. Paper presented at the 115th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. September, Washington, DC.
Atzili, Boaz. 2012. Good Fences, Bad Neighbors: Border Fixity and International Conflict. University of Chicago Press.
Bower, Adam. 2019. Contesting the International Criminal Court: Bashir, Kenyatta, and the Status of the Nonimpunity Norm in World Politics. Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (1):88104.10.1093/jogss/ogy037
Braumoeller, Bear F. 2019. Only the Dead: The Persistence of War in the Modern Age. Oxford University Press.
Bremer, Stuart A. 1992. Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (2):309–41.
Brooks, Stephen G. 2007. Producing Security: Multinational Corporations, Globalization, and the Changing Calculus of Conflict. Princeton University Press.
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. 2019. Norm Robustness and Contestation in International Law: Self-Defense Against Nonstate Actors. Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (1):7387.
Carter, David B. 2010. The Strategy of Territorial Conflict. American Journal of Political Science 54 (4):969–87.
Carter, David B., and Goemans, Hein E.. 2011. The Making of the Territorial Order: New Borders and the Emergence of Interstate Conflict. International Organization 65 (2):275309.
Corbetta, Renato, and Dixon, William J.. 2005. Danger Beyond Dyads: Third-Party Participants in Militarized Interstate Disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science 22 (1):3961.
Correlates of War Project. 2017. State System Membership List, v2016.
Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Zimmermann, Lisbeth. 2019. Norms Under Challenge: Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness. Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (1):217.10.1093/jogss/ogy041
Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Zimmerman, Lisbeth. 2020. Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Robustness of International Norms. International Studies Review 22 (1):5176.
Diehl, Paul, and Goertz, Gary. 2002. Territorial Changes and International Conflict. Routledge.
Fazal, Tanisha M. 2007. State Death: The Politics and Geography of Conquest, Occupation, and Annexation. Princeton University Press.
Fazal, Tanisha M. 2014. Dead Wrong? Battle Deaths, Military Medicine, and Exaggerated Reports of War's Demise. International Security 39 (1):95125.
Fearon, James D. 1997. Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands Versus Sinking Costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1):6890.
Fernandes, Clinton. 2011. The Independence of East Timor. Sussex Academic Press.
Fravel, M. Taylor. 2008. Strong Borders, Secure Nation: Cooperation and Conflict in China's Territorial Disputes. Princeton University Press.
Frederick, Bryan A., Hensel, Paul R., and Macaulay, Christopher. 2017. The Issue Correlates of War Territorial Claims Data, 1816–2001. Journal of Peace Research 54 (1):99108.
Freedman, Lawrence. 2003. The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. 3rd ed.Palgrave Macmillan.
Freedman, Lawrence. 2005. The Official History of the Falklands Campaign. Vol. 1. Routledge.
Fuhrmann, Matthew, and Sechser, Todd S.. 2014. Signaling Alliance Commitments: Hand-Tying and Sunk Costs in Extended Nuclear Deterrence. American Journal of Political Science 58 (4):919–35.10.1111/ajps.12082
Ganguly, Sumit. 2016. Deadly Impasse: Indo-Pakistani Relations at the Dawn of a New Century. Cambridge University Press.
George, Alexander L., and Smoke, Richard. 1974. Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice. Columbia University Press.
Goertz, Gary, Diehl, Paul F., and Balas, Alexandru. 2016. The Puzzle of Peace: The Evolution of Peace in the International System. Oxford University Press.
Gotberg, Brook. 2009. The End of Conquest: Consolidating Sovereign Equality. In International Norms and Cycles of Change, edited by Wayne Sandholtz and Kendall Stiles, 55–65. Oxford University Press.
Griffiths, Ryan D., and Butcher, Charles R.. 2013. Introducing the International System(s) Dataset (ISD), 1816–2011. International Interactions 39 (5):748–68.
Hathaway, Oona A., and Shapiro, Scott J.. 2017. The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World. Simon and Schuster.
Hensel, Paul R., Allison, Michael E., and Khanani, Ahmed. 2009. Territorial Integrity Treaties and Armed Conflict over Territory. Conflict Management and Peace Science 26 (2):120–43.
Hensel, Paul R., and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2005. Issue Indivisibility and Territorial Claims. GeoJournal 64 (4):275–85.
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511628290
Hensel, Paul R., Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, Sowers, Thomas E. II, and Thyne, Clayton L.. 2008. Bones of Contention: Comparing Territorial, Maritime, and River Issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (1):117–43.
Huth, Paul K. 1996. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. University of Michigan Press.
Huth, Paul K., and Allee, Todd L.. 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press.
Ikenberry, G. John. 1998. Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order. International Security 23 (3):4378.
Jones, Daniel, Stuart, M., Bremer, A., and Singer, J. David. 1996. Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (2):163213.
Korman, Sharon. 1996. The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice. Clarendon Press.
Kratochwil, Friedrich, and Ruggie, John Gerard. 1986. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. International Organization 40 (4):753–75.
Lee, Melissa M. 2018. The International Politics of Incomplete Sovereignty: How Hostile Neighbors Weaken the State. International Organization 72 (2):283315.
Lee, Melissa M., and Prather, Lauren. 2019. Selling International Law Enforcement: Elite Justifications and Public Values. Working Paper.
Lemke, Douglas. 2002. Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge University Press.
Liberman, Peter. 1998. Does Conquest Pay? The Exploitation of Occupied Industrial Societies. Princeton University Press.
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2002. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002. Available at <>.
Moul, William. 2003. Power Parity, Preponderance, and War Between Great Powers, 1816–1989. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (4):468–89.
Mueller, John. 1990. Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War. Basic Books.
Mueller, John. 2007. The Remnants of War. Cornell University Press.
O'Mahoney, Joseph. 2018. Denying the Spoils of War: The Politics of Invasion and Non-recognition. Oxford University Press.
Owen, John M. 1994. How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace. International Security 19 (2):87125.
Oneal, John R., and Russett, Bruce M.. 1997. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985. International Studies Quarterly 41 (2):267–93.
Panke, Diana, and Petersohn, Ulrich. 2016. Norm Challenges and Norm Death: The Inexplicable? Cooperation and Conflict 51 (1):319.
Pinker, Steven. 2012. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. Penguin.
Prorok, Alyssa K., and Huth, Paul K.. 2015. International Law and the Consolidation of Peace Following Territorial Changes. Journal of Politics 77 (1):161–74.
Sagan, Scott D., and Waltz, Kenneth N.. 2013. The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: An Enduring Debate. W.W. Norton.
Sandholtz, Wayne. 2008. Dynamics of International Norm Change: Rules Against Wartime Plunder. European Journal of International Relations 14 (1):101–31.
Sandholtz, Wayne. 2019. Norm Contestation, Robustness, and Replacement. Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (1):139–46.
Sarkees, Meredith R., and Wayman, Frank. 2010. Resort to War: 18162007. CQ Press.
Schelling, Thomas C. 1966. Arms and Influence. Yale University Press.
Schultz, Kenneth A. 2017. Mapping Interstate Territorial Conflict: A New Data Set and Applications. Journal of Conflict Resolution 71 (7):1565–90.
Shelef, Nadav G. 2016. Unequal Ground: Homelands and Conflict. International Organization 70 (1):3363.
Singer, J. David, Bremer, Stuart, and Stuckey, John. 1972. Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965. In Peace, War, and Numbers, edited by Russett, Bruce, 1948. Sage.
Snyder, Glenn H., and Diesing, Paul. 1977. Conflict Among Nations. Princeton University Press.
Tarar, Ahmer. 2016. A Strategic Logic of the Military Fait Accompli. International Studies Quarterly 60 (4):742–52.
Tir, Jaroslav, Schafer, Philip, Diehl, Paul F., and Goertz, Gary. 1998. Territorial Changes, 1816–1996: Procedures and Data. Conflict Management and Peace Science 16 (1):8997.10.1177/073889429801600105
Tir, Jaroslav, and Vasquez, John A.. 2012. Territory and Geography. In Guide to the Scientific Study of International Processes, edited by Mitchell, S.M., Diehl, P.F., and Morrow, J.D., 115134. Wiley-Blackwell.
Van Evera, Stephen. 1998. Offense, Defense, and the Causes of War. International Security 22 (4):543.
Vasquez, John A., and Henehan, Marie T.. 2001. Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research 38 (2):123–38.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill.
Westad, Odd Arne. 2005. The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times. Cambridge University Press.
Wiegand, Krista Eileen. 2011. Enduring Territorial Disputes: Strategies of Bargaining, Coercive Diplomacy, and Settlement. University of Georgia Press.
Wohlforth, William C. 1999. The Stability of a Unipolar World. International Security 24 (1):541.
Zacher, Mark W. 2001. The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force. International Organization 55 (2):215–50.
Zhang, Xiaoming. 2015. Deng Xiaoping's Long War: The Military Conflict Between China and Vietnam, 19791991. UNC Press.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Altman Dataset


The Evolution of Territorial Conquest After 1945 and the Limits of the Territorial Integrity Norm

  • Dan Altman


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.