Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Kydd, Andrew
1997.
Sheep in Sheep's clothing: Why security seekers do not fight each other.
Security Studies,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 1,
p.
114.
Frankel, Benjamin
1997.
Editor's note.
Security Studies,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Walt, Stephen M.
1997.
The Progressive Power of Realism.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 91,
Issue. 4,
p.
931.
Jentleson, Bruce W.
and
Kaye, Dalia Dassa
1998.
Security status: Explaining regional security cooperation and its limits in the middle east.
Security Studies,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
p.
204.
Jervis, Robert
1999.
Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate.
International Security,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
42.
DiCicco, Jonathan M.
and
Levy, Jack S.
1999.
Power Shifts and Problem Shifts.
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 6,
p.
675.
Lynn-Jones, Sean M.
1999.
Contemporary Security and Strategy.
p.
53.
Markey, Daniel
1999.
Prestige and the origins of war: Returning to realism's roots.
Security Studies,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
126.
Walt, Stephen M.
1999.
A Model Disagreement.
International Security,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 2,
p.
115.
Wohlforth, William C.
1999.
A Certain Idea of Science: How International Relations Theory Avoids the New Cold War History.
Journal of Cold War Studies,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 2,
p.
39.
Legro, Jeffrey W.
and
Moravcsik, Andrew
1999.
Is Anybody Still a Realist?.
International Security,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 2,
p.
5.
Deudney, Daniel H.
2000.
Regrounding realism: Anarchy, security, and changing material contexts.
Security Studies,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Copeland, Dale C.
2000.
The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism: A Review Essay.
International Security,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
187.
Schweller, Randall L.
and
Wohlforth, William C.
2000.
Power test: Evaluating realism in response to the end of the cold war.
Security Studies,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 3,
p.
60.
Twomey, Christopher P.
2000.
Japan, a circumscribed balancer: Building on defensive realism to make predictions about east Asian security.
Security Studies,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 4,
p.
167.
Chalmers, Malcolm
2000.
Sharing Security.
p.
21.
Baldwin, David A.
2000.
The Sanctions Debate and the Logic of Choice.
International Security,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 3,
p.
80.
Pufong, Marc G.
2001.
State Obligation, Sovereignty, and Theories of International Law.
Politics & Policy,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 3,
p.
478.
Kawasaki, Tsuyoshi
2001.
Postclassical realism and Japanese security policy.
The Pacific Review,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
221.
Brooks, Stephen G.
and
Wohlforth, William C.
2001.
Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War: Reevaluating a Landmark Case for Ideas.
International Security,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 3,
p.
5.