Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-wph62 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T05:13:43.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cuban Complaint of Aggression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Get access

Extract

From its 874th through its 876th meetings the Security Council considered the complaint of the government of Cuba that that country had been subjected by the government of the United States to “repeated threats, harassments, intrigues, reprisals and aggressive acts.” The discussion was opened by Mr. Raúl Roa, Cuban Minister for Foreign Affairs, who began by asserting that Cuba had been under no juridical obligation to bring its complaint to the Organization of American States (OAS) before submitting it to the Council. He then traced the history of United States hostility to the revolutionary government of Cuba, hostility based, in his opinion, on opposition to the Agrarian Reform instituted by that government and culminating in the recent drastic curtailment of the Cuban sugar quota. In his reply to Mr. Roa, Mr. Lodge (United States) assured the Cuban government that the United States had no aggressive purposes against Cuba, and deplored the removal of the controversy between the two nations from its rightful forum in OAS to the Security Council. He also indicated, after a summary of Cuban-United States relations during the preceding year and a half from the United States point of view, that the reduction of the Cuban sugar quota had been no act of economic aggression, but rather a justifiable measure of self-protection on the part of the United States to ensure its needed supply of sugar in the face of acts by the Cuban government which made this supply extremely insecure. In conclusion, Mr. Lodge stated his belief that someday, somehow, Cuba and the United States would again be friends.

Type
International Organizations: Summary of Activities: I. United Nations
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

4 Document S/4378. The United States version of the situation was outlined in Document S/4388.

5 Document S/4392.

6 Document S/4394.

7 Documents S/4384 and S/4385.

8 For a summary of this debate, see International Organization, Summer 1960 (Vol. 14, No. 3), p. 441–443Google ScholarPubMed.

9 Document S/4406.