Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-67gxp Total loading time: 0.268 Render date: 2021-03-02T15:16:33.507Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

The Hidden Hand of Economic Coercion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2003

Get access

Abstract

Why do policymakers consistently employ economic sanctions even though scholars consider them an ineffective tool of statecraft? Game-theoretic models of economic coercion suggest the success rate may be understated because of selection effects. When the targeted country prefers conceding to incurring the cost of sanctions, it has an incentive to acquiesce before the imposition of sanctions. The bulk of successful coercion episodes should therefore end with sanctions threatened but not imposed. This contradicts the recent literature on sanctions, which assumes that sanctions rarely, if ever, work at generating significant concessions from the targeted country and are imposed for domestic or symbolic political reasons. If the game-theoretic argument is correct, the crucial cases to study are those in which coercion is threatened but not implemented. A statistical analysis of data on sanctions in pursuit of economic or regulatory goals strongly supports the gametheoretic argument. These results suggest that the significance of economic coercion has been undervalued in the study of statecraft and international relations more generally.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Baldwin, David A 1985. Economic Statecraft Princeton, N J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A. 1999/2000 The Sanctions Debate and the Logic of Choice. International Security 24 (3):80107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayard, Thomas O., and Elliott, Kimberly Ann. 1994. Reciprocity and Retaliation in U S Trade Policy. Washington, D C.: Institute for International EconomicsGoogle Scholar
Beschloss, Michael R., and Talbott, Strobe. 1993. At the Highest Levels The Inside Story of the End of the Cold War. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Bienen, Henry, and Gilpin, Robert. 1980 Economic Sanctions as a Response to Terrorism. Journal of Strategic Studies 3 (1):8998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Jean-Marc F., Mansfield, Edward D., and Ripsman, Norrin M., eds. 2000. Power and the Purse: Economic Statecraft, Interdependence and National Security. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Bolks, Sean M., and Al-Sowayel, Dina. 2000 How Long Do Economic Sanctions Last? Examining the Sanctions Process Through Duration. Political Research Quarterly 53 (2):241–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, Lori, Gallant, Nicole, and Nossal, Kim Richard. 1998. Sanctions as a Gendered Instrument of Statecraft: The Case of Iraq. Review of International Studies 24 (1):6984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 1984. Economic Structure and International Security: The Limits of the Liberal Case. International Organization 38 (4):597624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1995 The New Sovereignty Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Cheney, Richard. 1999. Defending Liberty in a Global Economy. In Economic Casualties How U S Foreign Policy Undermines Trade, Growth, and Liberty, edited by Singleton, Solveig and Griswold, Daniel T., 1928. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Chien-Hale, Elizabeth. 1997. Asserting U.S. Intellectual Property Rights in China: Expansion of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA 44 (2):198230.Google Scholar
Conybeare, John A. C. 1987. Trade Wars: The Theory and Practice of International Commercial Rivalry. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cortright, David, ed. 1997. The Price of Peace: Incentives and International Conflict Prevention Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Cortright, David, and Lopez, George A.. 2000. The Sanctions Decade: Assessing UN Strategies in the 1990s. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Reiner.Google Scholar
Dashti-Gibson, , Jaleh, Patricia Davis, and Radcliff, Benjamin. 1997. On the Determinants of the Success of Economic Sanctions: An Empirical Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 41 (2):608–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehejia, Rajeev H., and Wood, Bernard. 1992. Economic Sanctions and Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Cautionary Note. Journal of World Trade 26 (1):7384.Google Scholar
DeSombre, Elizabeth R. 1995. Baptists and Bootleggers for the Environment: The Origins of United States Unilateral Sanctions. Journal of Environment and Development 4 (1):5375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSombre, Elizabeth R. 2000. Domestic Sources of International Environmental Policy Industry, Environmentalists, and U S Power. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dorussen, Han, and Mo, Jongryn. 2001. Ending Economic Sanctions: Audience Costs and Rent-Seeking as Commitment Strategies. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (4):395426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doxey, Margaret P. 1987. International Sanctions in Contemporary Perspective. New York: St Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 1999. The Sanctions Paradox Economic Statecraft and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2001. Outside the Box: Explaining Sanctions in Pursuit of Foreign Economic Goals. International Interactions 26 (4):379410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, A. Cooper. 1998. Revisiting “Economic Sanctions Reconsidered.” Journal of Peace Research 35 (4):497509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Jonathan, and Engers, Maxim. 1992. Sanctions. Journal of Political Economy 100 (5):899928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Jonathan, and Engers, Maxim. 1999. Sanctions: Some Simple Analytics. American Economics Review 98 (2):409414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eland, Ivan. 1995. Economic Sanctions as Tools of Foreign Policy. In Economic Sanctions Panacea or Peacebuilding in a Post-Cold War World? edited by Cortright, David and Lopez, George, 2942. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kimberly Ann. 2000. Preferences for Workers? Worker Rights and the US Generalized System of Preferences. Working Paper. Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Available at ⟨http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/elliott0598.htm⟩.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kimberly Ann, and Richardson, J. David. 1997. Determinants and Effectiveness of “Aggressively Unilateral” U.S. Trade Actions. In The Effects of U S. Trade Protection and Promotion Policies, edited by Feenstra, Robert C., 215–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kimberly Ann, and Uimonen, Peter P.. 1993. The Effectiveness of Economic Sanctions with Application to the Case of Iraq. Japan and the World Economy 5 (4):403–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49 (3):379414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfield, Richard. 1999. Morbidity and Mortality Among Iraqi Children from 1990 Through 1998: Assessing the Impact of the Gulf War and Economic Sanctions. Available at ⟨http://www.cam.ac.uk/societies/casi/info/garfield/dr-garfield.html⟩.Google Scholar
Galtung, Johan. 1967. On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions: Examples from the Case of Rhodesia. World Politics 19 (3):378416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1993. Ideas, Interests and American Trade Policy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne S. 1994. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. 1990. Cooperation Among Nations Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Haass, Richard N. 1997. Sanctioning Madness. Foreign Affairs 76 (6):7485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haass, Richard N., and O'Sullivan, Meghan, eds. 2000. Honey and Vinegar: Incentives, Sanctions, and Foreign Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Robert A. Jr 2000. Democracy and the Successful Use of Economic Sanctions. Political Research Quarterly 53 (2):267–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscox, Michael J. 2000. The Political Economy of American Trade Sanctions. Paper presented at the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Elliott, Kimberly Ann, Cyrus, Tess, and Winston, Elizabeth. 1997. U.S. Economic Sanctions: Their Impact on Trade, Jobs, and Wages. Working Paper 97–01. Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Schott, Jeffrey J., and Elliott, Kimberly Ann. 1990. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: History and Current Policy. 2d ed. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Institute for International Economics. 2001. Chronological Summary of Economic Sanctions for Foreign Policy Goals, 1914–1999. Available at ⟨http://207.238.152.36/publications/wp/1997/sanction-wp.htm⟩.Google Scholar
Kaempfer, William H., and Lowenberg, Anton D.. 1988. The Theory of International Economic Sanctions: A Public Choice Approach. American Economic Review 78 (4):786–93.Google Scholar
Kaempfer, William H., and Lowenberg, Anton D.. 1992. International Economic Sanctions: A Public Choice Perspective. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S. Jr 1977. Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kirshner, Jonathan. 1995. Currency and Coercion. The Political Economy of International Monetary Power. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr, Klaus. 1975. The Power of Nations The Political Economy of International Relations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty. Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lacy, Dean, and Niou, Emerson M. S.. 2000. A Theory of Economic Sanctions. Unpublished manuscript, Duke University, Durham, N.C.Google Scholar
Lam, San Ling. 1990. Economic Sanctions and the Success of Foreign Policy Goals: A Critical Evaluation. Japan and the World Economy 2 (3):239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, James M. 1986. Trade Sanctions as Policy Instruments: A Re-examination. International Studies Quarterly 30 (2):153–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. 1994. Power, Trade, and War. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marinov, Nikolay. 2003. Ending Sanctions Interstate Bargaining and the Duration of Costly International Disputes. Ph.D. diss., Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 1992. Coercive Cooperation Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael. 1998. Economics and Security in Statecraft and Scholarship. International Organization 52 (4):825–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, Fiona, and Stam, Allan C.. 2001. Leadership Turnover and the Duration of Sanctions. Paper presented at the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August–September, San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton, Palmer, Glenn, and Miers, Anne. 2000. Economic Sanctions and Foreign Policy Substitutability. Paper presented at the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton, and Miers, Anne C.. 1999. When Threats Succeed: A Formal Model of the Threat and Use of Economic Sanctions. Paper presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Ga.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton, and Schwebach, Valerie L.. 1997. Fools Suffer Gladly. The Use of Economic Sanctions in International Crises. International Studies Quarterly 41 (1):2750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, Rebecca B. 1999. Methods and Models A Guide to the Empirical Analysis of Formal Models in Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noland, Marcus. 1997. Chasing Phantoms: The Political Economy of USTR. International Organization 51 (3):365–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nooruddin, Irfan. 2002. Modeling Selection Bias in Studies of Sanctions Efficacy International Interactions 28 (1):5975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nossal, Kim Richard. 1989. International Sanctions as International Punishment. International Organization 43 (2):301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papayoanou, Paul A. 1999. Power Ties Economic Interdependence, Balancing, and War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pape, Robert. 1997. Why Economic Sanctions Do Not Work. International Security 22 (2):90136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripsman, Norrin, and Blanchard, Jean-Marc 1996/1997. Commercial Liberalism Under Fire: Evidence from 1914 and 1936. Security Studies 6 (1):450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, Ariel. 1982. Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model. Econometrica 50 (1) 97110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signorino, Curtis S. 1999. Strategic Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of International Conflict. American Political Science Review 93 (2): 279–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sislin, John. 1994. Arms as Influence: The Determinants of Successful Influence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (4):665–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skålnes, Lars S. 2000. Politics, Markets, and Grand Strategy Foreign Economic Policies as Strategic Instruments. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alistair. 1996. The Success and Use of Economic Sanctions. International Interactions 21 (3):229–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Amerongen, Otto Wolff. 1980. Economic Sanctions as a Foreign Policy Tool? International Security 5 (2):159–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. Harrison. 1988. Economic Interdependence, Bargaining Power, and Political Influence. International Organization 42 (3):461–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: Random HouseGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1999. Globalization and Governance. PS Political Science and Politics 32 (4).693700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1880 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 2nd March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Hidden Hand of Economic Coercion
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Hidden Hand of Economic Coercion
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Hidden Hand of Economic Coercion
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *