Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T04:31:34.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cooperation Among Oil Exporting Countries with Special Reference to Arab Countries: a Political Economy Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Zuhayr Mikdashi
Affiliation:
Zuhayr Mikdashi is a member of the Department of Business Administration, American University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Get access

Extract

The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) will probably be remembered in history as an outstanding example of relatively successful intergovernmental cooperation among developing countries. OPEC's achievements in raising the oil export income of members appear remarkable in view of the deep sociopolitical divisions among them—occasionally verging on armed conflicts. Nevertheless, OPEC countries have managed not to let these conflicts wreck their common interest in obtaining substantially better terms from the international companies and from consumer countries. That OPEC countries could obtain better terms is not only the result of member solidarity but also of the relatively inelastic demand for petroleum. Another crucial factor favoring OPEC is that major consumer countries have been moderate in their drive to collectively countervail OPEC, except indirectly by allowing their international oil companies to join forces ostensibly in defense of consumers' interests. Major consumer countries have also declined so far to split forcefully the OPEC coalition. The continued existence of OPEC largely depends on (1) members' perception of gain outweighing sacrifices or frustrations of working together, and (2) the tolerance of major industrial importing countries.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The author has drawn heavily on his recent book, The Community of Oil Exporting Countries—A Study in Governmental Cooperation (London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.; and Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

2 Major international companies are seven in number. Five are US owned— Standard Oil Co. (N.J.)/Exxon, Texaco, Gulf, Mobil, Standard Oil Co. of California; one is British—British Petroleum Co. Ltd.; and one Anglo-Dutch—Royal-Dutch Shell. These companies have several joint ventures, especially at the production stage.

3 Members of the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) comprise countries of North America and Western Europe as well as Japan and Australia.

4 Arab countries are in italics.

5 OPEC, Resolution VII.56.

6 Interview with Pérez Alfonso in Caracas, June 6,1970.

7 Listed in various issues of OPEC's Annual Review and Record.

8 OPEC, Resolution XX.117.

9 Rouhani, Fuad, A History of O.P.E.C. (New York: Praeger, 1971), p. 126.Google Scholar

10 OPEC, Resolution XX.117.

11 Petroleum Press Service (PPS), 07 1965, p. 267Google Scholar; see also, Hartshorn, J. E., Oil Companies and Governments (London: Faber and Faber, 1967), p. 21.Google Scholar

12 Shell International Petroleum Co., Ltd., Developments in Libya (London, 05 1966), p. 6.Google Scholar

13 See: Arab Oil Review (Tripoli, Libya), 01 1966, pp. 58, 17Google Scholar; Petroleum Intelligence Weekly, 1112 1965; and PPS, 07 1965, p. 267.Google Scholar

14 See OPEC, Collective Influence in the Recent Trend Towards the Stabilization of International Crude and Product Prices, VIth Arab Petroleum Congress, 03 1967, pp. 69.Google Scholar

15 See Iran Oil Journal, 02 1971, pp. 910, 37.Google Scholar

16 Wattari, Abdul Aziz, in Middle East Economic Survey (MEES), Supplement, 04 9, 1965, p. 2.Google Scholar

17 Hammadi, Sa'doun, “There Isn't Enough Coordination Among Producing Countries,” Arab Oil and Gas (Beirut), 05 16, 1972, p. 15.Google Scholar

18 MEES, 07 14, 1972, pp. 56Google Scholar; MEES, 08 25, 1972, p. 5.Google Scholar

19 Arab Oil and Gas (Beirut), 03 16, 1972, pp. 56.Google Scholar

20 See “How Libyan Approach on Participation Differs from Principles of Gulf Agreement,” MEES, 11 3, 1972, pp. 12.Google Scholar

21 The Shah's speech to the Majlis on October 6, 1967, published in The Revolution of the Shah and the People, eds. Ramesh Sanghvi, Clifford German, and David Missen (London: Transorient, 1967).Google Scholar

22 Yamani, Ahmed Zaki, in MEES Supplement, 10 6, 1972, p. 6Google Scholar; see also “Cooperation Will Help Our Cause,” Newsweek, 11 20, 1972, p. 68.Google Scholar

23 UNCTAD, Commodity Survey, 1967 [TD/B/C.l/Rev.l] (New York, 1968), p. 48.Google Scholar

24 Ibid., p. 45.

25 The United States is a member of several committees of CENTO. Since it did not wish to become a full member of the organization, it signed, in 1959, bilateral mutual security agreements separately with Iran, Turkey, and Pakistan. See US Department of State, The Central Treaty Organization, International Organizations Series, Report No. 1 (Washington, D. C, 03 1970).Google Scholar

26 See Petroleum and Economic Digest (Dublin), 10 1–15, 1970Google Scholar; and Ramazani, Rouhollah K., “Iran's Changing Foreign Policy: A Preliminary Discussion,” Middle East Journal (Washington, D. C), 25, 4 (Autumn, 1970), 421–37.Google Scholar

27 See Taylor, Paul, “The Concept of Community and the European Integration Process,” Journal of Common Market Studies, 12 1968, pp. 85, 87.Google Scholar

28 Frankel, Paul H., “Structure of World Oil Industry,” lecture at Northwestern University, 03 28, 1965, p. 39.Google Scholar (Typescript.)

29 Hartshorn, J. E., “OPEC and Newcomer Governments,” in Mikdashi, Zuhayr (ed.), Continuity and Change in the World Oil Industry (Beirut: Middle East Research and Publishing Center, 1970), p. 33.Google Scholar

30 See, for example, Sutowo, Ibnu (president director of Pertamina), Prospect of Oil for our National Prosperity, Pertamina Public Relations, Djakarta, 03 14, 1972.Google Scholar

31 Keohane, Robert O. and Ooms, Van Doom, “The Multinational Enterprise and World Political Economy,” International Organization, 26, 1 (Winter, 1972), p. 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 Pachachi, Nadim, “The Role of OPEC in the Emergence of New Patterns in Government-Company Relationships,” lecture delivered at the Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, 05 19, 1972,Google Scholar reproduced in MEES Supplement, 05 19, 1972, p. 10.Google Scholar

33 See Arab Oil and Gas (Beirut), 12 1, 1972, p. 16Google Scholar; and Mikdashi, , The Community of Oil Exporting Countries, pp. 103–7.Google Scholar

34 Annual appropriations are issued as OPEC Conference resolutions.

35 Wall Street Journal, 05 13, 1971, p. 28.Google Scholar

36 OPEC Record, January 1967.

37 Yamani, Ahmad Zaki, “Prospects for Cooperation between Oil Producers, Marketers and Consumers: The Issue of Participation and After,” MEES Supplement, 10 6, 1972, pp. 34.Google Scholar

38 Prepared by the author and entitled “Economic Benefits to Host Governments From Major Oil Concessions in the Middle East,” 1965, 58 pp.Google Scholar (not published).

39 Keohane, Robert O., “Institutionalization in the United Nations General Assembly,” International Organization, 23, 4 (Autumn, 1969), p. 860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40 Keohane, Robert O., “A Reply to David A. Kay's ‘Note’,” International Organization, 23, 4 (Autumn, 1969), 958–59.Google Scholar

41 Schmitter, Philippe C., “The Organizational Development of International Organizations,” International Organization, 25, 4 (Autumn, 1971), p. 918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42 Ibid., p. 919.

43 Nye, Joseph S., Peace in Parts: Integration and Conflict in Regional Organization (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1971), p. 41.Google Scholar

45 Lawrence, Richard, “A Sharp Increase in Reserves of Arab Oil States is Foreseen,” The Journal of Commerce, 12 11, 1972.Google Scholar

46 Adelman, Morris A., “The Oil Industry as an International Collecting Agency,” public lecture delivered under the auspices of the Institute of Energy Economics, Tokyo, 04 26, 1972.Google Scholar