Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:31:31.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA): Eritrea — Yemen Arbitration (Second Stage: Maritime Delimitation)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , July 2001 , pp. 983 - 1019
Copyright
Copyright © 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This document was reproduced and reformatted from the text appearing at the PCA website (visited August 28, 2001) <http://www.pca-cpa.org.> Due to the substantial length of the original document and the ILM space limitations, the ILM Office decided not to reproduce Annexes H-H1 and maps that are appended to the original Award.

References

* See 40ILM 979 (2001) — ILM Editor.

1 I.C.J. Reports 1969, p. 36, para. 57.

2 Throughout this Award the use of “miles” refers to nautical miles.

3 I.C.J. Reports 1969, p. 57, para. 101.

4 18 ILM60;54ILR6.

5 See footnotes 9 and 11 to paragraphs 121 and 128 respectively of the Award on Sovereignty.

6 Cf. Article 70, paragraph 5 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: “Developed geographically disadvantaged States shall, under the provisions of this article, be entitled to participate in the exploitation of living resources only in the exclusive economic zones of developed coastal States of the same sub-region or region having regard to the extent to which the coastal State, in giving access to other States to the living resources of its exclusive economic zone, has taken into account the need to minimize detrimental effects on fishing communities and economic dislocation in States whose nationals have habitually fished in the zone.“

7 I.C.J. Reports 1969, p. 52.

8 Apportionment of an International Petroleum Deposit, 17 ICLQ 85 (1958).

9 Edited by Hazel Fox, Joint Development of Offshore Oil and Gas (1990) by R.R. Churchill, Kamal Hossein, Isa Huneidi, Masahiro Miyoshi, Ian Townsend-Gault, Anastasia Strati, H. Burmester, Clive R. Symmons, Thomas H. Walde, Brenda Barrett, P. Birnie and A.D. Read.

10 See also, Shihata, I.F.I. and Onorato, W.T., Joint Development of International Petroleum Resources in Undefined and Disputed Areas, International Conference of the Lawasia Energy Centre, Kuala Lumpur, 1992.Google Scholar

11 Khadduri, , Encyclopaedia of International Law, volume 6, page 227.Google Scholar

12 Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, volume 7, page 229

13 FAO 24/95 Adb-Eri.4, 27 February 1995, at paragraphs 2.19 and 3.44.

14 Ibid., paragraph 2.20

15 25 ILM 251.

16 I.C.J. Reports 1969, p. 54.

17 See I.C.J. Reports 1981, p. 58, the Libya/Malta case.

18 18 ILM 60.