Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T20:10:05.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Joined Cases A. K. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-585/18) and CP (C-624/18), DO (C-625/18) v. Sąd Najwyższy (C.J.E.U.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2020

Joelle Grogan*
Affiliation:
Dr. Joelle Grogan is a Senior Lecturer in Law at Middlesex University, London. She is a member of the Horizon 2020 funded RECONNECT project, ‘Reconciling Europe with its Citizens Through Democracy and the Rule of Law’ and the creator of the online public legal education project, ‘Sticky Tricky Law’.

Extract

Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18, and C-625/18 concerning the independence of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Polish Supreme Court) is the latest in a series of European Union (EU) Member States requesting the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) to rule on the independence of their judicial systems. While the organization of justice systems within Member States is a competence of Member States (and thus not for the EU to determine or decide), the CJEU has held that Member States are nevertheless required to comply with obligations under EU law to ensure effective judicial protection and, as a necessary corollary, judicial independence. The significance of the current case lies in the formulation by the CJEU of a “European” standard of judicial independence, and its finding that national judges may set aside the jurisdiction of courts found not to be independent against that standard and to disapply any national measure (in accordance with the principle of the primacy of EU law over national law) that gives jurisdiction to a non-independent court.

Type
International Legal Documents
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 by The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ENDNOTES

1 Joined Cases A. K. v Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-585/18)l and CP (C-624/18), DO (C-625/18) v Sąd Najwyższy (Nov. 19, 2019), http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=220770&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=328730 [hereinafter Joined Cases].

2 Case C-619/18 Commission v. Poland (June 24, 2019) (on the independence of the Supreme Court), http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=215341&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=328430; Case C-192/18 Commission v. Poland (Nov. 5, 2019) (on the independence of the ordinary courts), http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=219725&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=328576.

3 Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, 2010 O.J. (C83) 13 and 2012 O.J. (C326) 47.

4 Joined Cases, supra note 1 ¶ 153.

5 Id. ¶ 121.

6 Id. ¶ 122.

7 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 2010 O.J. (C83) 389.