This was the Court's eighth maritime boundary case since the North Sea Continental Shelf cases of 1969. Six international maritime boundaries have also been decided by arbitration during this period. Two maritime boundary cases are currently pending before the Court (Nicaragua v. Colombia and Peru v. Chile), and hundreds of potential maritime boundaries remain undelimited worldwide.
2.See Treaty between Romania and Ukraine on the Romanian- Ukrainian State Border Regime, Collaboration and Mutual Assistance on Border Matters, June 17, 2003, 2277 U.N.T.S. 43.
4. Romania argued that the Parties had already agreed to a boundary up to that point formed by the outer limit of Serpents’ Island's territorial sea. Id. ¶¶ 44-49.
5.Id. ¶ 116.
6.Id. ¶ 120.
7.Id. ¶ 122.
8.Id. ¶ 137 (emphasis added).
9.Id. ¶ 149.
1. See sketch-map No. 1 prepared for illustrative purposes only.
2. Co-ordinates provided by the Parties in Pulkovo datum.
3. Co-ordinates provided by the Parties in Pulkovo datum.
4. The geographical co-ordinates used by the Parties for the drawing of the equidistance lines proposed by them are given by reference to Pulkovo datum. The Court, for its part, has chosen to use WGS 84 datum. The positions of Points A, B and C are given by reference to that geodetic datum. The equidistance line described in this paragraph is a geodetic line and the azimuth given is a geodetic azimuth based on WGS 84 datum.
5. For the description of the entire course of the equidistance line, see paragraph 154 above.
Recommend this journal
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.