Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:10:58.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Chamber of Commerce Court of Arbitration: First Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in Arbitration Between National Oil Corporation and Libyan Sun Oil Company (Force Majeure)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , May 1990 , pp. 565 - 623
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* [Reproduced from the text provided to International Legal Materials. The Final Award of February 23, 1981, appears at 29 I.L.M. 5U1 (1990). The Opinion and Order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, issued March 15, 1990, enforcing the Award but staying execution of the Judgment pending compliance with U.S. Libyan Sanctions Regulations, appear at 29 I.L.M. 718 and 743 (1990).]

* [ Reproduced from the text provided to International Legal Materials. The First Award of the Arbitral Tribunal, rendered May 31, 1985, dealt with the question of force majeure. It appears at 29 I.L.M. 565 (1990). The Opinion and Order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, issued March 15, 1990, enforcing the Final Award but staying execution of the Judgment pending compliance with U.S. Libyan Sanctions Regulations, appear at 29 I.L.M. 718 and 743 (1990).]

A) Does the United Starts Government's passport order constitute an even: of “force majeure” as defined in Article 22 of the EPSA?

B) If relevant, do the United States Government's export regulation! consitute an event of “force majeure” as defined in Article 22 of the EPSA?

C) Did Sun-Oil withdraw fron the EPSA under Article 3.4 of the contract“…………”

* [29 I.L.M. 599, 600 (1990)]

* [29 I.L.M. 598 (1990)]

* [29 I.L.M. 599 (1990)]

* [29 I.L.M, 610 (1990)]

1 Sic!Read instead “article 25 (1) and (2)”

* [29 I.L.M. 616, 617 (1990)]

* [29 I.L.M. 618 (1990)]

* [29 I.L.M. 618 (1990)]