Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T02:35:16.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Duzgit Integrity Arbitration

Arbitration Tribunal.  18 December 2019 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 — Part XV and Annex VII — Dispute Settlement Mechanism — Dispute between Republic of Malta and Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe — Award on Jurisdiction and the Merits — Finding that Malta entitled to claim reparation in a further phase of proceedings — Suspension of proceedings — Unsuccessful settlement negotiations — Resumption of proceedings — Malta submitting claim and supplementary claim for reparation — São Tomé not participating in reparation phase of proceedings — Whether São Tomé to pay Malta compensation

Damages — Compensation — Quantum — Material damages for lost earnings, value of cargo, payment to secure release of vessel, vessel repairs, classification expenses, administrative expenses, reputational losses — Non-material damages for prosecution and detention of persons — Calculation method — Whether Malta sufficiently substantiating quantum of its claims — Whether Malta establishing causation between its loss and São Tomé’s unlawful conduct for each head of claim — Whether Settlement Agreement mitigating any of damages suffered by owner of the Duzgit Integrity — Whether claims under Settlement Agreement distinct from claims brought by Malta at international law under United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 — Whether acts and omissions of the Duzgit Integrity, its Master, owner and Charterer mitigating any of damages claimed by Malta — Costs — Parties normally bearing expenses in equal share — Implementation of normal rule — Interest payable — Practice of international courts and tribunals

Sea — Treaties — United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 — Annex VII — UNCLOS Article 49(3) — Archipelagic waters — Sovereignty of coastal State — Arbitration Tribunal finding violation of Article 49(3) by São Tomé — Reparation phase of proceedings — Article 9 of Annex VII to UNCLOS — Whether claims of Malta well-founded in fact and law — Full reparation — Material damages — Non-material damages — Interest — Appropriate damages payable by São Tomé for breach of UNCLOS Article 49(3) — Rights of flag State under UNCLOS — Claims brought by Malta at international law under UNCLOS

State responsibility — Law of State responsibility — Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts 2001, Article 15 — Detention of the Duzgit Integrity by São Tomé — Point at which detention unlawful — When detention incompatible with United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982, Article 49 — Whether São Tomé’s breach of Article 49 taking form of composite act — First of actions of composite act — Length of actions not in conformity with international obligation — Whether Malta to be compensated for loss of hire of the Duzgit Integrity during its detention — Full reparation — Interest as element of full reparation recognized in Articles on State Responsibility

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)