Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T21:23:23.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bosphorus Queen Shipping Ltd Corp. v. Rajavartiolaitos

Court of Justice of the European Union.  11 July 2018 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Treaties — Interpretation — Related treaties — Whether provisions of one treaty relevant in interpretation of another — United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 (“UNCLOS”) — International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973 (“Marpol Convention”) — International Convention relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution Casualties, 1969 (“Intervention Convention”) — UNCLOS concluded by the European Union and all its Member States — Status of these treaties in the EU legal order — Interpretative value of Marpol Convention and Intervention Convention in interpretation of UNCLOS

Environment — Marine environment — Pollution — Ship-borne pollution — Effects in the exclusive economic zone (“EEZ”) and territorial sea — Jurisdiction of the coastal State and the flag State — Limits on jurisdiction — UNCLOS — Marpol Convention — Intervention Convention — Enforcement rights of coastal States in their EEZ — Whether coastal States allowed to impose more stringent measures than those foreseen in UNCLOS Article 220(6)

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — European Union — Status of treaty as EU law — UNCLOS — Interpretation of Article 7(2) of Directive 2005/35/EC conforming to UNCLOS Article 220(6) — Relevance of treaties to which EU not party but which bind EU Member States

Sea — Environmental protection — Protection and preservation of marine environment — Ship-source pollution in EEZ — Flag State jurisdiction — Enforcement rights of coastal State — Whether and in which circumstances UNCLOS Article 220(6) authorizing a coastal State to instigate proceedings against a foreign vessel — Meaning of “clear and objective evidence” in UNCLOS Article 220(6) — Whether covering not only commission of a violation, but also its consequences — Meaning of “coastline or related interests” in UNCLOS Article 220(6) — Whether having the same meaning as in Article II of Intervention Convention — Whether covering non-living resources of territorial sea of coastal State as well as any resources in its EEZ — The law of the European Union

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)