Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T18:21:08.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chafin v. Chafin

United States of America.  19 February 2013 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Jurisdiction — Subject-matter jurisdiction — Personal jurisdiction over defendants — Merits — United States Constitution — Power of federal courts restricted to cases and controversies — Litigant must have suffered or been threatened with injury traceable to defendant — Dispute must be live at time of courts’ consideration — Parties must have concrete interest in outcome — Circumstances under which cases moot — Availability of partial remedy — Whether rescuing case from mootness

Treaties — Interpretation — Object and purpose — Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, 1980 — Object and purpose — Country of habitual residence — Return orders — Re-return orders — Power of District Court to reverse return order — Necessity of expediting orders — Conditions for granting stays — Best interests of child

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — United States domestic law — United States Constitution — International Child Abduction Remedies Act 1988 — Child custody — Abrogating Bekier v. Bekier — The law of the United States

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)