No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The World We Have Lost: Reflections on Varieties of Masculinity at Work
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2024
Abstract
The focus on gender in and around the process of deindustrialisation is a very welcome development. The academic attention paid to the decline of male dominated places of work in part can be seen as a continuation of industrial/work sociology's longstanding interest in working-class industrial workers. It may seem counterintuitive to suggest that, notwithstanding a critical gendered account of deindustrialization that pays more attention to women, there remains a need to understand more fully the subtle processes of male gender construction within industrial work. Arguably what has not been fully accounted for are the subtle, complex, and varied ways in which younger males became fully fledged men through a shopfloor ritual, social and cultural transmission, and rites of passage. The article makes two main points. Firstly, it reflects on the notion of care in work and the idea of a moral order of the workplace wherein the workplace acted as an extended caring family. I want to think about this social form through my own research as well as that of other scholars in a variety of industrial workplaces, and also by drawing on workplace autobiography. Secondly, the piece highlights the continued attraction of an older one-dimensional image of male industrial work. In studying this aspect of workplace masculinity, we might be better placed to think about the nature of gendered loss associated with mass industrial closure over time and how in-work socialization patterns have been dramatically transformed. In the process this account will add great depth to our understanding of deindustrialization and industrial culture more generally.
- Type
- Special Feature
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc.
References
Notes
1. Although while structurally discriminatory in gender terms it was to have real advantages in terms of racial and ethnicity as the system was “blind” to all but one's date of entry to service.
2. Bradley, Harriet, Men's Work, Women's Work: A Sociological History of the Sexual Division of Labour in Employment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar; Pettinger, Lynne, What's wrong with Work? (Bristol: Policy Press, 2019)Google Scholar.
3. See Brown, Richard K, Understanding Industrial Organisations: Theoretical Perspectives in Industrial Sociology (London: Psychology Press, 1992)Google Scholar.
4. Typical examples would be Beynon, Huw, Working for Ford (London: Allen Lane, 1973)Google Scholar; Norman Dennis, Fernando Henriques, and Clifford Slaughter, Coal is Our Life: An Analysis of a Yorkshire Mining Community (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1956/1969); Tunstall, Jeremy, The Fishermen: The sociology of an extreme occupation (London: Macgibbon & Kee, 1962)Google Scholar.
5. Brown 1992, especially chapter 2; Eldridge, John E T, Sociology and Industrial Life (London: Nelson, 1971)Google Scholar; Hassard, John, Sociology and Organization Theory: Positivism, Paradigms and Postmodernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6. Pollert, Anna, Girls, Wives, Factory Lives (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ruth Cavendish (aka Miriam Glucksmann) Women on the Line (London: Routledge, 1982).
7. Eldridge, John, Industrial Disputes: Essays in the Sociology of Industrial Relations (London: Taylor & Francis, 1968)Google Scholar.
8. Pahl, Ray, Divisions of Labour (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984)Google Scholar; Salaman, Grahame, Working (London: E. Horwood, 1986)Google Scholar; Duncan Gallie, ed., Employment in Britain (Oxford: Blackwell, 1988); Author ref in collection.
9. Author ref; McDowell, Linda, “Life without Father and Ford: the new gender order of post-Fordism,” Transactions, Institute of British Geographers 16, (1991): 400–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10. Gilbert, James, Men in the Middle: Searching for Masculinity in the 1950s (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), 17Google Scholar.
11. McDowell, Linda, “Father and Ford revisited: gender, class and employment change in the new millennium,” Transactions, Institute of British Geographers 26, (2001): 448–64, 455CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12. Willis, Paul, Learning to labour: How working-class kids get working class jobs (London: Columbia University Press, 1977)Google Scholar.
13. Learning to Labour is something of a touchstone in terms of sociological/cultural accounts of the working class and the transition of the economy from “Fordism” to post-Fordism. See the edited collection Nadine Dolby Greg Dimitriadis and Paul Willis, eds., Learning to Labor in New Times (New York: Routledge, 2004). For studies framed in relation to Willis's book, see, for example, McDowell, Linda, Redundant Masculinities: Employment change and white working class youth (Oxford: Wiley, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ward, Michael R.M., From Labouring to Learning: Working-Class Masculinities, Education and de-industrialization (Basingstoke: Springer, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14. Bill Lancaster, “Newcastle: capital of what?” in Geordies, Robert Colls and Bill Lancaster, eds. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1992), cited in Anoop Nayak, “‘Boyz to Men’: masculinities, Schooling and labour transitions in de-industrial times,” Educational Review 55, 2, (2003) 1465–3397, 1465.
15. Ward, From Labouring to Learning (Basingstoke: Springer, 2015), 39.
16. Nayak, “Boyz to Men,” (2003), 150.
17. Walkerdine, Valerie and Jimenez, Luis, Gender, Work and Community After De-Industrialisation: A Psychosocial approach to affect (Basingstoke: Springer, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18. Nayak, “Boyz to Men,” (2003), 153.
19. Nayak, ‘Boyz to Men,” (2033), 156.
20. See Isabella Bakker, ed., Rethinking restructuring: Gender and Change in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996); Jane Kenway and A. Anna Kraack, “Reordering Work and Destabilizing Masculinity,” in Learning to Labor in New Times, eds. Dolby et al. (New York: Routledge, 2004).
21. See, for example, the argument of K. Elliott and S. Roberts, “Caring masculinities among working-class men in blue-collar occupations in the UK: Understanding biographies of care,” Gender, Work & Organization (2022) 1–17.
22. Roper, Michael, Masculinity and the British Organizational Man since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23. North American researchers do seem to be better at reflecting the loss of work for men and women. See, for example, Dudley, Kathryn Marie, The End of the Line: Lost Jobs, New Lives in Postindustrial America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Luxton, Meg and Corman, June, Getting by in Hard Times: Gendered Labour at Home and on the Job (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Chen, Victor Tan, Cut Loose: Jobless and Hopeless in an Unfair Economy (Oakland: University of California Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24. “Fabbing” here refers to the fabrication sheds where smaller elements of the ship would be constructed before being assembled.
25. Roberts, Ian, Craft, Class and Control: The Sociology of a Shipbuilding Community (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1993), 1Google Scholar.
26. Being “Sent of Coventry” refers to being shunned or shamed for not conforming to a social norm or value. In this case the perceived disrespect being shown to the value of a craft apprenticeship.
27. Like many others working in the field of deindustrialisation studies, I am drawing on Sherry Linkon's idea of the “half-life of deindustrialisation,” which encapsulates the process of industrial loss unfolding over years and decades rather than just at the time of closure. See Linkon, Sherry, The Half-Life of Deindustrialization: Working-Class Writing about Economic Restructuring (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
28. Roger Penn, “Socialisation into skilled identities,” Unpublished paper presented to labour Process Conference, Aston University, 1986; Roger Penn, “Technical change and skilled manual work in contemporary Rochdale,” in Skill and Occupational Change, eds. Roger Penn, Michael Rose, and Jill Rubery (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).
29. Jack Pomlet, “The Toolmaker,” in Work 2: Twenty Personal Accounts ed. Ronald Fraser (London: Penguin, 1969) 22–23.
30. Bradshaw, Ron, Railway Lines and Levers (Paddock Wood: Unicorn Books, 1993), 25Google Scholar.
31. Bradshaw, Railway Lines and Levers (1993), 25.
32. Durham Area NUM official, interview by the author 1998.
33. Watermark: The Story of Buckland Paper Mill in Dover, directed by Marianne Kafer, Dover Arts Development (2010).
34. Faludi, Susan, Stiffed: The Betrayal of Modern Man (London: William Morrow, 2000), 72Google Scholar.
35. Faludi, Stiffed (2000), 73.
36. Boden, quoted in Juravich, Tom, On the Altar of the Bottom Line: The Degradation of Work in the 21st Century (Boston: University of Massachusetts Press, 2009), 152Google Scholar.
37. Author ref; Walley, Christine, Exit Zero: Family and Class in Postindustrial Chicago (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013)Google Scholar.
38. See Author ref.
39. Steven High and David Lewis, Corporate Wasteland: The Landscape and Memory of Deindustrialization (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007), 12.
40. Phil, redundant miner, interview by the author 1999.
41. Author ref.
42. Linkon, The Half-Life of Deindustrialization represents one of the best discussions of the generational void between those who “enjoyed” industrial work and those that followed them. Linkon argues that often it is the sons and daughters of deindustrialised workers who provide some of the keenest insights into what has been lost.
43. See, for example, Lloyd, Anthony, Labour Markets and Identity on the Post-Industrial Assembly Line (Farnham: Routledge, 2013)Google Scholar; Ward, From Labouring to Learning (Basingstoke: Springer, 2015).
44. McDowell, Redundant Masculinities (Oxford: Wiley, 2003).
45. Nayak, “Boyz to Men,” (2003); Nayak, Anoop, “Displaced Masculinities: Chavs, Youth and Class in the Post-Industrial City” Sociology 40, (2006): 813–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
46. Walkerdine and Jimenez, Gender, Work and Community After De-Industrialisation (Basingstoke: Springer, 2012), 181.
47. Roberts, Steve “Boys Will Be Boys … Won't They? Change and Continuities in Contemporary Young Working-class Masculinities,” Sociology 47 (2013): 671–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 682–83.
48. R. Gater, “‘Dirty, dirty job. Not good for your health’: Working-Class Men and their Experiences and Relationships with Employment, in Education, Work and Social Change in Britain's Former Coalfields Communities: In the Shadow of Coal, eds. K. Simpson and R. Simmons (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), 107–26.
49. For a fuller elaboration of the idea of the “breaching experiment” and its value in the study of deindustrialisation see Author ref; for an account of its applicability in the context of unemployment, see Ezzy, Douglas, Narrating Unemployment (Aldershot: Routledge, 2001)Google Scholar.