The author wishes to thank David Montgomery and David Slavin for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this text.

1. Schueller, Eugène (industrialist), “La charte patronale,” L'Action Patronale, October 1, 1937;Google ScholarCentre des Jeunes Patrons (CJP) pamphlet, 1941, quoted in Bernoux, Philippe, Les nouveaux patrons: Le Centre des Jeunes Dirigeants d'Entreprise (Paris, 1974), 29;Google ScholarEdouard Michelin, n.d., quoted in Gueslin, André, “Le système social Michelin (1889–1940),” in De la charité médiévale à la Sécurité Sociale, ed. Gueslin, André and Guillaume, Pierre (Paris, 1992), 226.Google Scholar

2. Noiriel, Gérard, “Du ‘patronage’ au‘paternalisme’: La restructuration des formes de domination de la main-d'oeuvre ouvrière dans l'industrie métallurgique française,” Le Mouvement Social 144 (1988):17–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarSee also Reid, Donald, “Industrial Paternalism: Discourse and Practice in Nineteenth-Century French Mining and Metallurgy,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 27 (1985): 579–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Bernoux, Nouveaux patrons, 10.Google Scholar

4. Perroux, François (Capitalisme et communauté de travail, 1938) and others,Google Scholarcited in Julliard, Jacques, “La Charte du Travail,” in Le gouvernement de Vichy et la Révolution Nationale, 1940–1942, ed. Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques (Paris, 1970); Archives Nationales, Paris (hereafter AN), F41 305, “Vers la Révolution Communautaire,” September 1943.Google Scholar

5. Bayle, Jean-Louis Loubet del, Les non-conformistes des années 30 (Paris, 1969), especially 30–31.Google ScholarOn fascism's “nonconformist spirit” of “irreverence” see also Wilkinson, James D., The Intellectual Resistance in Europe (Cambridge, 1981), 7, quoting French fascist Robert Brasillach.Google Scholar

6. The first phrase is Boltanski's, Luc in The Making of a Class: Cadres in French Society, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur (New York, 1987; orig. ed. 1982), 80; but is derived from Marx:Google ScholarSee Kolboom, Ingo, “Patronat et cadres: La contribution patronale à la formation du groupe des cadres (1936–1938),” Le Mouvement Social 121 (1982):71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarThe second phrase is from Métallurgie (Lyon), c. 1941, quoted in Chauvy, Gérard, Lyon 40–44 (Paris, 1985), 127.Google Scholar

7. de Gaudemar, Jean-Paul, La mobilisation générale (Paris, 1979);Google Scholar“Le soldat du travail: Guerre, fascisme, et taylorisme,” special issue of Recherches 32–33 (1978);Google ScholarLamirand, Georges, Le rôle social de l'ingénieur: Scènes de la vie d'usine (Paris, 1954; orig. ed. 1932), 139;Google ScholarFrachon, Benoît, La bataille de la production: Nouvelle étape du combat contre les trusts (Paris, 1946):Google ScholarL'Atelier (Paris), 01 25, 1941.Google Scholar

8. On employer strategies compare Friedman, Gerald, “The Decline of Paternalism and the Making of the Employer Class: France, 1870–1914,” in Masters to Managers: Historical and Comparative Perspectives on American Employers, ed. Jacoby, Sanford M. (New York, 1991), 153–72;Google ScholarMaier, Charles S., “Society as Factory,” in his In Search of Stability: Explorations in Historical Political Economy (Cambridge, 1987), 19–69;Google Scholarand Moutet, Aimée, “Patrons de progrès ou patrons de combat? La politique de rationalisation de l'industrie française au lendemain de la Première Guerre mondiale,” Recherches 32–33 (1978):449–89.Google Scholar

9. Debouzy, Marianne, “Permanence du paternalisme?” Le Mouvement Social 144 (1988):6.Google Scholar

10. Factory bulletin (1919), quoted in Hatry, Gilbert, Renault, usine de guerre, 1914–1918 (Paris, 1978), 173;Google Scholarsee also Miller, Michael B., The Bon Marché: Bourgeois Culture and the Department Store, 1867–1920 (Princeton, 1981), 86;Google Scholarand Gueslin, “Le système social Michelin,” 230.Google Scholar

11. Quoted in Bernoux, Nouveaux patrons, 17–21, 30–31, 38.Google Scholar

12. Quoted in Cohen, Yves, “L'entreprise, la profession d'ingénieur, et les techniques de direction du personnel,” in Les ingénieurs de la crise: Titre et profession entre les deux guerres, ed. Grelon, André (Paris, 1986), 79;Google Scholarsee also Perrot, Michelle, “The Three Ages of Industrial Discipline in Nineteenth-Century France,” in Consciousness and Class Experience in Nineteenth-Century Europe, ed. Merriman, John M. (New York, 1979), 158.Google Scholar

13. Automakers' bulletin (1918), quoted in Moutet, “Patrons de progrès,” 483; Mersch, Jean (CJP president) in La Vie Industrielle, April 15, 1942, quoted in Julliard, “Charte du Travail,” 25–26; Auguste Detoeuf (industrialist) at CJP, 1938, quoted in Bernoux, Nouveaux patrons, 19.Google Scholar

14. Maréchal [Louis-Hubert] Lyautey, Le rôle social de l'officier (Paris, 1984);Google Scholarsee also Hoisington, William A. Jr., Lyautey and the French Conquest of Morocco (New York, 1995), 4–5.Google Scholar

15. Lamirand, Rôle social (with “letter-preface” by Lyautey); Cheysson, Emile, “The Social Role of the Engineer” (c. 1900), cited in Reid, “Industrial Paternalism,” 604; Detoeuf, “Le rôle social du patron” (CJP inaugural address, 1938), cited in Bernoux, Nouveaux patrons, 18–20 (full text in Nouveaux Cahiers, June 1, 1938); Parisian association of metallurgists (GIM), “Projet: Le rôle social des cadres” (August 1943), in AN 39AS 861.Google Scholar

16. See Wohl, Robert, The Generation of 1914 (Cambridge, 1979).Google Scholar

17. See Andrieu, Claire, “Démographie, famille, jeunesse,” in La France des années noires, vol. 1, ed. Azéma, Jean-Pierre and Bédarida, François (Paris, 1993), 466–67.Google Scholar

18. Quoted in Rossignol, Dominique, Histoire de la propagande en France de 1940 à 1944: L'utopie Pétain (Paris, 1991), 141.Google Scholar

19. See Lengelé, Robert, La mission économique et sociale du patronat français (Paris, 1942), 68–86.Google Scholar

20. Speech to scientific management committee (1927), in AN CE 106 (Conseil Economique); see also Fridenson, Patrick, “L'idéologie des grands constructeurs dans l'entre-deuxguerres,” Le Mouvement Social 81 (1972): 57.Google Scholar

21. Devinat, Paul, “L'O.S.T. en Europe,” Cahiers du Redressement Francais 8 (1927): 42;Google Scholarsee also Lequin, Yves-Claude, “La rationalisation du capitalisme français: A-t-elle eu lieu dans les années vingt?” Cahiers d'Historie de l'Institut Maurice thorez 31 (1979): 131.Google Scholar

22. Hatry, Renault, Usine de Guerre, 95–102.Google Scholar

23. Cotterau, Alain, “The Distinctiveness of Working-Class Cultures in France, 1848–1900,” in Working-Class Formation: Nineteenth-Century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States, ed. Katznelson, Ira and Zolberg, Aristide R. (Princeton, 1986), 142.Google Scholar

24. Omnès, Catherine, “La politique sociale de la métallurgie parisienne entre les deux guerres,” in De la charité médiévale à la Sécurité Sociale, ed. Gueslin, André and Guillaume, Pierre (Paris, 1992), 242–43;Google ScholarDowns, Laura Lee, Manufacturing Inequality: Gender Division in the French and British Metalworking Industries, 1914–1939 (Ithaca, 1995), 147–66, 250–75.Google Scholar

25. Hatry, Renault, using de guerre, 102–4, 172–74;Google ScholarFridenson, Patrick, Historie des usines Renault (Paris, 1972), 250–54, 302, 318.Google Scholar

26. Employers's association bulletin (1917), quoted in Hatry, Renault, usine de guerre, 125.Google Scholar

27. Quotations from Hatry, Renault, usine de guerre, 137–38.Google Scholar

28. See Laloux, Philippe, Le système Bedaux de calcul des salaires (Paris, 1950);Google ScholarMottez, Bernard, Systèmes de salaire et politiques patronales (Paris,1966).Google Scholar

29. Quoted in Fridenson, “L'sidéologie des grands constructeurs,” 66; see also Moutet, “Patrons de progrès,” 481–82, and Fridenson, Renault, 238–41.Google Scholar

30. Mattern, Ernest, “Une expérience singulière de gestion du personnel collaborateur (1918–1943),” in Les ingénieurs de la crise: Titre et profession entre les deux guerres, ed. Grelon, André (Paris, 1986), 90–92;Google Scholarquotation (1925) from Cohen, Yves, “L'espace de l'organisateur: Ernest Mattern, 1906–1939,” Le Mouvement Social 125 (1983):82–83.Google Scholar

31. L'Action Patronale (published 1936–1938), March 10, 1937;Google ScholarSchueller, Eugàne, La révolution de l'économie (Paris, 1941), 278, 284;Google Scholar“Introduction au salaire proportionnel” (1951), 1. See also Schueller's books Le deuxième salaire (Paris, 1938),Google ScholarFaire Vivre: Esquisse d'une économie proportionnelle (Paris, 1945),Google Scholarand Vers une économie proportionnelle (Paris, 1947);Google Scholarwartime articles in Production: Energie—Industrie—Commerce; La Vie Industrielle; L'Usine; L'Atelier; Au Travail; and Le Droit Social; his pamphlet “La part du travail” (Paris, 1943);Google Scholarand a Bulletin du Bureau d'Etudes sur le Salaire Proportionnel (Paris, 1950).Google ScholarSeveral of these pieces are in AN DRT 933 (Mm. of Labor). On Schueller see also Kolboom, Ingo. La revanche des patrons: Le patronat face au Front Populaire, trans. Etoré, Jeanne (Paris, 1986; orig. ed. 1983), 263–76;Google Scholarand Bernoux, Nouveaux patrons, 17, 35.Google Scholar

32. Action Patronale, March 10, 1937; Schueller, La révolution de l'économie, 27, 42. See also Mottez, Systèmes de salaire, 192–97.Google Scholar

33. Forbes, July 28, 1997.Google Scholar

34. L'Atelier, February 28, 1942; Schueller, “La part du travail”; L'Usine, January 13, 1944; Schueller, Bulletin du Bureau d'Etudes.Google Scholar

35. Schueller, Eugène in the following: Action Patronale, June 20, 1938; Production:Energie—Industrie—Commerce, December 1941; L'Usine, January 13, 1944; “Introduction au salaire proportionnel”; La révolution de l'économie, 27, 61.Google Scholar

36. Schueller, La révolution de l'économie, 42, 61; Action Patronale, March 10, October 1, and December 15, 1937.Google Scholar

37. Action Patronale, July 25, October 1, and October 25, 1937. On the employers' federation or CGPF (Confédération Générale de la Production Française, or later du Patronat Français), see also Kolboom, Revanche des patrons,Google Scholarand Vinen, Richard, The Politics of French Business, 1936–1945 (New York, 1991), chaps. 4–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38. Schueller, La révolution de l'économie, 5–9; Schueller, “La part du travail.”Google Scholar

39. Schueller, La révolution de l'économie, 278–88, 301–3.Google Scholar

40. Action Patronale, December 1936; Kolboom, Revanche des patrons, 279–80;Google ScholarBurrin, Philippe, La France á l'heure allemande (Paris, 1995), 393.Google Scholar

41. Soucy, Robert, French Fascism: The Second Wave (New Haven, 1995), 46–47, 125–31, 224;Google ScholarBrun, Gérard, Technocrates et technocratie en France, 1918–1945 (Paris, 1985), 211–13;Google ScholarFridenson, Patrick, “Le patronat français,” in La France et les Français en 1938–1939, ed. Rémond, René and Bourdin, Janine (Paris, 1978), 150–51.Google ScholarVinen, Richard criticizes some of these works as drawing mainly on “gossip” and creating “a scholarly hall of mirrors” by citing each other: French Business, 61.Google Scholar

42. Lamirand, Rôle social, vii–xv, 42, 57, 77, 139, 269–72.Google Scholar

43. Lamirand, Rôle social, vii–xv, 95–99, 218–21.Google Scholar

44. Quotations from Thépot, André, “L'Union Sociale des Ingénieurs Catholiques durant la première moitié du XXe siècle,” in L'ingenieur dans la société française, ed. Thépot, André (Paris, 1985), 224;Google Scholarand from Boltanski, Cadres, 71.Google Scholar

45. AN 39AS 941 (GIM), letters and press clippings 1936–1938; Les ingénieurs de la crise: Titre et profession entre les deux guerres, ed. Grelon, André (Paris, 1986);Google ScholarBoltanski, Cadres, chap. 1.Google Scholar

46. See O'Boyle, Lenore, “The Problem of an Excess of Educated Men in Western Europe, 1800–1850,” Journal of Modern History 42 (1970):471–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47. Title of lecture, 1935, cited in Kolboom, Ingo, “Le patronat et Ia question des ingénieurs dans les années trente,” in Les ingénieurs de la crise: Titre et profession entre les deux guerres, ed. Grelon, André (Paris, 1986), 70;Google Scholaron Lyautey's influence, see also Baudouï, Rémi, Raoul Dautry, 1880–1951: Le technocrate de la République (Paris, 1992), 31–36.Google Scholar

48. X-Crise, July 1939; USIC (1935) quoted in Boltanski, Cadres, 60, 72;Google Scholarscientific management congress (1925) quoted in Moutet, Aimée, “Ingénieurs et rationalisation,” Culture Technique 12 (1984):248–49;Google ScholarCooper-Richet, Diana, “Les ingénieurs des mines vus d'en bas,” in L'ingénieur dans la société française, ed. Thépot, André (Paris, 1985), 156–58.Google Scholar

49. Reid, “Paternalism,” 604; Boltanski, Cadres, 59.Google Scholar

50. Fridenson, Renault, 255; see also Kolboom, “Patronat et cadres,” and Brun, Technocrates, 43–44, 173.Google Scholar

51. Quoted in Kuisel, Richard F., “Auguste Detoeuf, Conscience of French Industry (1926–1947),” International Review of Social History 20 (1975):158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

52. Brun, Technocrate, 127–31;Google ScholarBauchard, Philippe, Les technocrates et le pouvoir (Paris, 1966), 32–36.Google Scholar

53. CJP, “Vers Ia fin du salariat” (1942), in AN 68AJ 48; see also Bernoux, Nouveaux patrons, 31–32.Google Scholar

54. Lamirand, Rôle social, xiii–xiv, 270–72. The links among Coutrot, De Man, and Elton Mayo are suggested in Maier, “Society as Factory,” 56–59.Google Scholar

55. Quotations from Margairaz, Michel, “Jean Coutrot, 1936–1937: L'Etat et l'organisation scientifique du travail,” Geneses: Sciences Sociales et Histoire 4 (1991):95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56. Brun, Technocrates, 131; Bauchard, Technocrates, 36; Kolboom, Revanche des patrons, 280.Google Scholar

57. In addition to works by Brun and Bauchard (who note that some technocrats joined the Resistance or later republican governments), see Dioudonnat, P. M. and Philippet, J., “Les ‘technocrates’ du gouvernement de Vichy,” in Le gouvernement de Vichy et la Révolution Nationale, ed. Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques (Paris, 1970), 3–6.Google Scholar

58. Vinen, French Business, 140.Google Scholar

59. AN 39AS 857 (GIM), March 21, 1939; see also Kolboom, “Patronat et cadres,” 74–77, and Vinen, French Business, 30–31, 70–71.Google Scholar

60. Echo (Mines/Métallurgie), January 10, 1937;Google Scholarsee also Clefs pour une histoire du syndicalisme cadre, ed. Descostes, Marc and Robert, Jean-Louis (Paris, 1984), chaps. 2–3.Google Scholar

61. Echo (Mines/Métallurgie), July 10, 1936; December 10, 1937.Google Scholar

62. Barnaud in Nouveaux Cahiers, 04 1, 1937; Renault quoted in Moutet, Aimée, “La rationalisation industrielle dans l'éeconomie françcaise au XXe siècle (1900–1939),” Doctorat d'Etat, Paris X (1992), 1532, and in Fridenson, Renault, 271.Google Scholar

63. AN 39AS 851, meetings of 1935–1938.Google Scholar

64. CGPF: Bulletin, February 15, 1938; AN 39AS 851, Chamber of Commerce meetings, November 1937 and March 1938.Google Scholar

65. Lamirand in Nouveaux Cahiers, January 15, 1939; Gignoux in CGPF, December 15, 1938.Google ScholarOn the strike's impact, see also Bourdé, Guy, La défaite du Front Populaire (Paris, 1977), chap. 7.Google Scholar

66. Quotations from Michel, Joel, “Industrial Relations in French Coal Mining from the Late Nineteenth Century to the 1970s,” in Workers, Owners and Politics in Coal Mining: An International Comparison of Industrial Relations, ed. Feldman, Gerald and Tenfelde, Klaus (New York, 1990), 299;Google Scholarsee also Fridenson, “Patronat,” 146.Google Scholar

67. AN 39AS 852, November 22, 1938;Google ScholarHatry, Gilbert, Louis Renault, patron absolu (Paris, 1982), 374.Google Scholar

68. AN 39AS 852, October 30, 1939;Google ScholarJaurès, quoted in Vichniac, Judith Eisenberg, The Management of Labor: The British and French Iron and Steel Trade Industries, 1860–1918 (Greenwich, 1990), 102.Google Scholar

69. CGPF, May 1, 1940. Archival sources used for the Vichy period, from the Archives Nationales (AN) in Paris, include the series 39AS (Parisian metals industries [GIM]) and 40AS (mining firms); F12 and IND (Industry); F22, TR, and DRT (Labor); F37 (Franco-German Economic Relations); F41 (Information); F44 (Youth); F60 (Head of Govt.); AJ41 (Armistice Commission); 68AJ (Organization Committee for Commerce); 72AJ (Labor and Industry); 81AJ and 82AJ (Planning Commission); 83AJ (French Labor in Germany).Google Scholar

70. See Lacroix-Riz, Annie, “Les relations sociales dans les entreprises,” in Les ouvriers en France pendant la seconde guerre mondiale, ed. Peschanski, Denis and Robert, Jean-Louis (Paris, 1992), 221–32;Google Scholarcompare Vinen, French Business, chaps. 7–9.Google Scholar

71. Lengelé, Mission économique et sociale, 14–16.Google Scholar

72. Burrin, L'heure allemande, 10.Google Scholar

73. Speech (June 1941) quoted in Droit Social, February 1942.Google Scholar

74. AN F41 298, speech, March 1, 1941; see also Julliard, “Charte du Travail,” 16.Google Scholar

75. L'Usine, June 17, 1943; CJP (1941) quoted in Bernoux, Nouveaux patrons, 30–31, and Julliard, “Charte du Travail,” 25.Google Scholar

76. AN F12 10808, Fé. Nat. Sous-Sol, Rapport Moral et Informations Professionnelles, November-December 1941.Google Scholar

77. Déat, Marcel et al. , Conférences du Cercle Européen (Paris, 1942), 17.Google Scholar

78. L'Atelier, August 22, 1942;Google Scholarsee also Drigeard, Gabrielle and Peschanski, Denis, “Vocabulaires syndicaux: Les éditoriaux de L'Atelier et de Au Travail (1940–1943),” in Les ouvriers en France pendant la seconde guerre mondiale, ed. Peschanski, Denis and Robert, Jean-Louis (Paris, 1992), 343–64.Google Scholar

79. Roy in Droit Social, February 1942; AN F41 309, Cahier d'Etudes Corporatives et Sociales, May 1944;Google ScholarUriage papers, quoted in Comte, Bernard, Une utopie combattante: L'Ecole des Cadres d'Uriage, 1940–1942 (Paris, 1991), 479.Google Scholar

80. Belin in Au Travail, May 16, 1942; AN F37 77, Centre Communautaire, “Les hiérarchies de l'entreprise,” October 1941.Google Scholar

81. AN 83AJ 35, “Message au Peuple Français,” October 1940.Google Scholar

82. Lamirand, Rôle social, 219–20.Google Scholar

83. Quotations from Rossignol, Propagande, 141, 158–61; and L'Unité (as paraphrased by labor minister Hubert Lagardelle), August 1, 1943, in AN F41 297.Google Scholar

84. See Coutrot, Aline, “La politique familiale du gouvernement de Vichy (1940–1942),” in Le gouvernement de Vichy et la Révolution Nationale, ed. Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques (Paris, 1970), 6–8;Google Scholarand Pollard, Miranda, “La politique du travail féminin,” in Vichy et les Françcais, ed. Azéma, Jean-Pierre and Bédarida, François (Paris, 1992), 242–50.Google Scholar

85. See Andrieu, “Démographie, famille, jeunesse,” 466–67;Google Scholarand Fishman, Sarah, We Will Wait: Wives of French Prisoners of War, 1940–1945 (New Haven, 1991).Google Scholar

86. Lamirand, Rôle social, 42; Lamirand in March 1942,Google Scholarquoted in Coutrot, Aline, “Quelques aspects de Ia politique de la jeunesse (1940–1942),” in Le gouvernement de Vichy et la Révolution Nationale, ed. Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques (Paris, 1970), 7.Google ScholarSee also Koon, Tracy, Believe, Obey, Fight: Political Socialization of Youth in Fascist Italy, 1922–1943 (Chapel Hill, 1985).Google Scholar

87. Quotations from Rossignol, Propagande, 152;Google Scholarand Giolitto, Pierre, Histoire de Ia jeunesse sous Vichy (Paris, 1991), 551.Google Scholar

88. AN F37 77, March 25, 1942; 68AJ 47, Nouveaux Temps, January 6, 1943.Google Scholar

89. Giolitto, Jeunesse, 610; Comte, Utopie combattante, 456–82.Google Scholar

90. AN 39AS 861, “Programme patronal,” June 1943. See also Vinen, French Business, 133–35; he calls the project a form of “social appeasement” to thwart an expected postwar attack from the Left.Google Scholar

91. AN 39AS 861, “Projet: Le rôle social des cadres,” August 1943.Google Scholar

92. AN F12 10808, letter to minister of industry, July 23, 1940; see also Vie Industrielle, March–April 1942, quoted in Julliard, “Charte du Travail,” 26–27.Google Scholar

93. Dejonghe, Etienne, “Les départements du Nord et du Pas-de-Calais,” in La France des années noires, vol. 1, ed. Azéma, Jean-Pierre and Bédarida, François (Paris, 1993), 510.Google Scholar

94. AN 39AS 941, Ingénieurs Salariés, Documents et Informations, 1941–1942; 17Mi 1, Informations Renault (bulletin of its Comité Social d'Entreprise), July 1942; 40AS 52, August to October 1942; F41 297, L'Unité August 1, 1943.Google Scholar

95. Métallurgie (Lyon), c. 1941, quoted in Chauvy, Lyon 40–44, 127; see also AN 39AS 861, GIM project, August 1943; F41 305, “Vers la Révolution Communautaire,” September 1943; and F41 309, Cahiers d'Etudes Corporatives et Sociales, “Les Cadres,” April 1944.Google Scholar

96. SeeSilvestre, J. J. and Bouteiller, J., “Wage Structure in France: The Problem of Wage Hierarchy,” International Journal of Social Economics 1 (1974):172–83;CrossRefGoogle Scholarand Radtke, Arne, “La politique salariale de Vichy,” in Les ouvriers en France pendant la seconde guerre mondiale, ed. Peschanski, Denis and Robert, Jean-Louis (Paris, 1992), 265–76.Google Scholar

97. AN AJ41 2096, June 30, 1941; AJ41 179, December 26, 1941. On the impact of Nazi policy see also F37 46, “La politique allemande des salaires,” September 1941; Vie Industrielle, “L'idée allemande du juste salaire,” November 30, 1942 (in 68AJ 48); plus reports for 1941–1942 in AJ41 177/178/1665 and F37 5/6/48.Google Scholar

98. AN 37 6, February 4, 1942; “Le relèvement des salaires anormalement bas,” Droit Social 3 (1941); Informations Renault, April to July 1942; and reports for 1941–1943 in AN F37 46/77, AJ41 179, 72AJ 569/1931, 39AS 832/839, and 4OAS 52.Google Scholar

99. AN F37 6, February 27, 1942; F37 77, “La réforme du salariat,” February 1942; “Vers la ‘mise en ordre’ des salaires,” Droit Social, 4 April 1944. See also reports for 1941–1943 in TR 13820, F37 46, 68AJ 48, and 72AJ 1926;Google Scholarand Villey, Etienne (GIM director), “Les salaires,” inLégislation sociale appliquée, ed. Waline, Pierre et al. , (Paris, 1943), 109–10.Google Scholar

100. Informations Renault, September 1942; AN F44 34, October 1943 (“Le problème de la formation professionnelle”).Google Scholar

101. L'Usine, February 12, 1942; AN 39AS 832. June 1941 and April 1943: reports for1941–42 in F37 5/6/21/46; 72AJ 579, “Le contrôle des prix en France, 1939–1950,” January 1953.Google Scholar

102. AN AJ41 178/179, August 1941.Google Scholar

103. AN 39AS 895, metalworkers' tract, March 1941; F12 10808, miners' annual report for 1942; L'Usine, February 12, 1942; Au Travail, February 14 and April 4, 1942. and July 3, 1943; L'Atelier, August 8, 1942.Google Scholar

104. Vie Industrielle, September 28, 1943: L'Atelier, April 17 and November 6, 1943; Au Travail, November 27 and December 25, 1943: AN DRT 933, Patrons, Jeunes, “Un essai de salaire familial,” May 1944; plus reports in 68AJ 48/49, IND 22341, F12 10145, F37 77, and 39AS 941.Google Scholar

105. AN F12 10107 and TR 14483, Commission Nationale des Salaires, 1945–1946: 39AS 871 (GIM), January 1945; Jeune Patron (September–October 1945) and Documents Jeune Patron (Fall 1946), “La hiérarchic des salaires”; Droit Social, December 1945; 68AJ 48, TR13819, and TR 13931, reports on the “problem.” the “restructuring,” and the “regulation” of wages, 1944–1950.Google Scholar

106. Production, December 1941 to June 1942; Vie Industrielle, November 1943 to October 1943; L'Atelier, April 17, 1943; Au Travail, June 12, 1943; Droit Social, August 1943; L'Usine, December 1943 to February 1944; AN F37 77, Gérard Bardet's advisory committee, February to September 1942; 68AJ 48, methods of remuneration, 1943; F12 10808, miners' annual report for 1942 F12 10145, February 1943; 72AJ 1931, December 1943; F22 2029, March 1944.Google Scholar

107. L'Atelier, February 28, 1942; Schueller, “La part du travail”; L'Usine, January 13, 1944.Google Scholar

108. Metalworkers of the fascist Front Social du Travail, in L'Oeuvre, March 13, 1944; similar views in Au Travail, February 6 and 27, 1943.Google Scholar

109. Schueller, Eugène in L'Atelier, September 20, 1941, and L'Usine, January 13, 1944.Google Scholar

110. AN F41 305, speech by Marion, Paul, January 24, 1942.Google Scholar

111. CJP, “Vers Ia fin du salariat” (1942), in AN 68AJ 48; discussion in Au Travail, September 5, 1942, and L'Atelier, September 19, 1942; see also Bemoux, Nouveaux patrons, 31–32.Google Scholar

112. AN F37 77, “La réforme du salariat,” February 1942; Dubreuil, “A chacun sa chance,” quoted in CJP's “Vers la fin du salariat” (1942), in 68AJ 48.Google Scholar

113. Dubreuil, Hyacinthe, “Régime d'autorité ou relations commerciales,” Cahier d'Etudes Corporatives et Sociales, January 1944, in AN F41 309; Legion meeting of industrialists, Vie Industrielle, September 30, 1943, in 68AJ 48. The Legion also championed the wage hierarchy: letter to labor ministry, September 3, 1943, in F22 2030.Google Scholar

114. Quoted in Vallar, Christian, Vichy: Traditionalisme et technocratie (Nice, 1990), 388.Google Scholar

115. Documents Jeune Patron 7 (1945):4; François Perroux, cited in Julliard, “Charte du Travail,” 15.Google Scholar

116. Julliard, “Charte du Travail,” 36–37. This number was more than two-thirds of the required total.Google Scholar

117. Luirard, Monique, “Les ouvriers de la Loire et la Charte du Travail,” Revue d'Histoire de la Deuxième Guerre Mondiale 102 (1976):62–64;Google ScholarLe Crom, Jean-Pierre, “L'échec de la Charte du Travail,” in Les ouvriers en France pendant la seconde guerre mondiale, ed. Peschanski, Denis and Robert, Jean-Louis (Paris, 1992). 235–37.Google Scholar

118. Quotations from Chauvy, Lyon 40–44, 169;Google Scholarand Kourchid, Olivier, Production industrielle et travail sous l'Occupation: Les mines de Lens et les mineurs, 1940–1944 (Paris, 1985), 386–87.Google Scholar

119. Le Crom, Jean-Pierre, “Le syndicalisme ouvrier et la Charte du Travail,” in Vichy et les Français, ed. Azéma, Jean-Pierre and Bédarida, François (Paris, 1992), 436–40;Google ScholarLuirard, “La Loire et la Charte,” 72–73.Google Scholar

120. AN F41 305, Marion's, Paul speech, January 24, 1942; F37 77, January 28, 1942; plus reports in F37 5 and 68AJ 48.Google Scholar

121. AN TR 790891/20 and F44 34, reports on “formation professionnelle,” 1939–1944;Google Scholarsee also Charlot, Bernard and Figeat, Madeleine, Histoire de Ia formation des ouvriers, 1789–1984 (Paris, 1985).Google Scholar

122. Renard, Jacques and Foucault, Rémy, “Une entreprise aéronautique en Mayenne: Borel,” in La vie des entreprises sous l'Occupation, ed. Beltran, Alain et al. , (Paris, 1994), 135–36;Google ScholarChapman, Herrick, State Capitalism and Working-Class Radicalism in the French Aircraft Industry (Berkeley, 1991), 248.Google Scholar

123. AN TR 790891/20, AJ4I 178, and F37 48, July to September 1942.Google Scholar

124. Informations Renault, May 4, 1944; AN 68AJ 49, “La Relève: Aspect psychologique et social,” October 1942. For alternate views see Hatry, Renault, patron absolu, 399;Google Scholarand Marcot, François “Les ouvriers de Peugeot, le patronat et l'Etat,” in Les ouvriers en France pendant la seconde guerre mondiale, ed. Peschanski, Denis and Robert, Jean-Louis (Paris, 1992), 250–55.Google Scholar

125. AN AJ4I 178, October 2, 1941; F12 10831, November 23, 1942; 83AJ 7, May 7, 1943.Google Scholar

126. AN 83AJ 35, Bulletin du Centre d'Information du Travail Français en Allemagne, April 1944: documents of the French delegation and training program in Germany, 1943–1945 (it continued in exile after Liberation), in 83AJ 31/35/36; preliminary documents (1941–42) in F37 48/49 and AJ4I 83/178/345/346.Google ScholarSee also Bruneton's, Gaston postwar statement (1954) in Hoover Institution, France during the German Occupation, 1940–1944: A Collection of 292 Statements on the Government of Maréchal Pétain and Pierre Laval, vol. 1, trans. Whitcomb, Philip W. (Stanford, 1957), 235–47.Google Scholar

127. Bichelonne, Jean and Déat, Marcel in Déat et al., Conférences du Cercie Européen, 3–4, 24.Google Scholar

128. Bruneton statement in Hoover Institution, France during the German Occupation, vol. 1, 245–46; AN AJ41 2053, February 8, 1943; 39AS 961, May 2, 1943 (one month before the GIM project in 39AS 861).Google Scholar

129. Chauvy, Lyon 40–44, 196–97.Google Scholar

130. Aron, Robert, Histoire de l'épuration, vol. 3: Le monde des afftaires (Paris, 1974), 213–18.Google Scholar

131. AN 83AJ 31, November 28, 1944 (from exile in Germany).Google Scholar

132. Quoted in Michel, “French Coal Mining,” 304; see also Lacroix-Riz, “Relations sociales,” 222–26; Boltanski, Cadres, 86–88;Google Scholarand Holter, Darryl, The Battle for Coal: Miners and the Politics of Nationalization in France, 1940–1950 (Dekalb, 1992), 66–69.Google Scholar

133. Martin, Pierre, La mission des Chantiers de Jeunesse en Allemagne, 1943–1945 (Paris, 1992), 93, 134–35, 264–65, 358–93.Google Scholar

134. Déat, Marcel, Mémoires politiques (Paris, 1989), 892–926;Google ScholarMartin, Mission des Chantiers, 85.Google Scholar

135. AN 4OAS 43, unemployment commission brochure, c. 1941;Google ScholarPluyette, J., “La lutte contre le chômage depuis l'armistice,” in Legislation sociale appliquée, ed. Waline, Pierre et al. , (Paris, 1943), 27;Google Scholarsee also Kuisel, Richard F., Capitalism and the State in Modern France (New York, 1981), 147.Google Scholar

136. Dejonghe, Etienne, “Les problèmes sociaux dans les entreprises houillères du Nord et du Pas-de-Calais durant Ia Seconde Guerre Mondiale,” Revue d'Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine 18 (1971):135. These “patriarchal” programs operated not in the coal mines but in some textile firms in Roubaix.Google Scholar

137. AN 83AJ 35, March 12 and June 4, 1943; 72AJ 1931, April 20, 1944. On the “fairness” issue see also Déat, Mémoires, 694.Google Scholar

138. AN F37 48, December 1941.Google Scholar

139. AN 72AJ 1926, September 20 and November 9, 1943; AJ4I 425, January 25, 1944.Google Scholar

140. AN F22 2024, 39AJ 170, TR 13003, 72AJ 1931, and F22 2030, January to January 1944: see also Déat, Mémoires, 807–10.Google Scholar

141. Kourchid, Olivier, “Répresions et résistances: Les ouvriers des mines du Nord/Pasde-Calais,” in Les ouvriers en France pendant la seconde guerre mondiale, ed. Peschanski, Denis and Robert, Jean-Louis (Paris, 1992), 217;Google ScholarLacroix-Riz, “Relations sociales,” 222–26. For alternate views see Marcot, “Peugeot,” 250–55; Vinen, French Business, 126–30; and industrialists' own claims in AN 39AS 961 (1942–1943) and 40AS 44 (September 1943).Google Scholar

142. Trempé, Rolande, Les trois batailles du charbon, 1936–1947 (Paris, 1989), 124.Google Scholar

143. AN F37 48, December 1941; TR 790891/20, July 1943; 72AJ 1926, November 1943; AJ41 425, January 1944; 39AS 961, April 1944.Google Scholar

144. AN 72AJ 1929, March–April 1944; 4OAS 44, September 1944; 4OAS 2, October 1944; 39AS 964 (“La résistance intelligente”), December 1944.Google Scholar

145. AN 40AS 47, August 7, 1941; 4OAS 43/45, October 1943; and April 1944; see also Kourchid, Mines de Lens, 178.Google Scholar

146. Sweets, John F., Choices in Vichy France: The French under Nazi Occupation (New York, 1994), 27, 194–97, 226–27;Google ScholarLacroix-Riz, “Relations sociales,” 227–29;Google ScholarGrillon, Jean-Marie, “La France du Sud-Est,” in La France des années noires, vol. 2, ed. Azéma, Jean-Pierre and Bédarida, François (Paris, 1993), 170. Villiers was mayor of Lyon before his arrest and employer federation president after the war.Google Scholar

147. Hatry, Renault, patron absolu, 395–96; see also Aron, Epuration, vol. 3, 232–40.Google Scholar

148. Chauvy, Lyon 40–44, 151–52;Google Scholarde Saint-Louis, Michel Gratier, “Les requisitions de main-d'oeuvre pour l'Allemagne dans le Rhône,” Revue d'Histoire de la Deuxième Guerre Mondiale 125 (1982):26.Google Scholar

149. Chauvy, Lyon 40–44, 145, 152; similar claims by GIM in AN 39AS 964/965 (1944–1945). On Berliet see also Aron, Epuration, vol. 3, 208–31.Google Scholar

150. Frank, Robert et al. , “Conclusion,” in La vie des entreprises sous l'Occupation, ed. Beltran, Alain et al. (Paris, 1994), 384–86;Google ScholarMioche, Philippe, “Les sidérurgistes,” in Vichy et les Français, ed. Azéma, Jean-Pierre and Bédarida, François (Paris, 1992), 601.Google Scholar

151. Renard and Foucault, “Borel,” 139–40.Google Scholar

152. In addition to their full-length works, see essays by Paxton, Robert, Frank, Robert, Rousso, Henry, and Margairaz, Michel in Vichy et les Français, ed. Azéma, Jean-Pierre and Bédarida, François (Paris, 1992)Google Scholarand in La France des années noires, ed. Azéma, Jean-Pierre and Bédarida, François (Paris, 1993),Google Scholaras well as in La vie des entreprises sous l'Occupation, ed. Beltran, Alain et al. (Paris, 1994).Google Scholar

153. Quotations from Lacroix-Riz, “Relations sociales,” 222; and Mioche, Philippe, “Les siderurgistes,” 604–5.Google Scholar

154. Burrin, L'heure allemande, chap. 15; compare Vinen's French Business, which Burrin cites as “stimulating but debatable” (509).Google Scholar

155. Quoted in Lemenorel, Alain, “Les comités d'entreprise et le social: Paternalisme, néo-paternalisme, démocratic (1945–1990),” in Dc la charité médiévale à la Sécurité Sociale, ed. Gueslin, André and Guillaume, Pierre (Paris, 1992), 249.Google Scholar

156. Prost, Antoine, “Le retour aux temps ordinaires,” in Les nationalisations de la Libération: De l'utopie au compromis, ed. Andrieu, Claire et al. , (Paris, 1987), 98–101;Google ScholarShennan, Andrew, Rethinking France: Plans for Renewal, 1940–1946 (Oxford, 1989), 193–94.Google Scholar

157. See esp. Shennan, Rethinking France, chaps. 3–4; and Wilkinson, Intellectual Resistance, 52–64. The slogan was the masthead of the Resistance newspaper Combat.Google Scholar

158. CGT tract (September 1944) inFrachon, Bataille de Ia production, 7–37.Google Scholar

159. Andrieu et al., Nationalisations; Holter, Battle for Coal; Vinen, French Business, chap. 13.Google Scholar

160. Lacroix-Riz, Annie, La CGT de la Libération à la scission, 1944–1947 (Paris, 1983);Google ScholarSellier, François, La confrontation sociale en France, 1936–1981 (Paris, 1984), chap. 6.Google Scholar

161. In addition to earlier documents, see Confédération Française Démocratique du Travail, La hiérarchie (Paris, 1977).Google ScholarThe CFDT is the successor to the Catholic confederation(CFTC). See also Ross, George et al. , Unions, Change and Crisis: French and Italian Union Strategy and the Political Economy, 1945–1980 (London, 1982), 71–72.Google Scholar

162. Prost, Antoine, “L'évolution de la politique familiale en France de 1938 à 1981,” Le Mouvement Social 129 (1984):13;Google ScholarPatrons, Jeunes, “Essai de salaire familial,” May 21, 1944, in AN DRT 933; and “Rémuneration du travail,” 1945, cited in Bernoux, Nouveaux patrons, 33.Google Scholar

163. AN 81AJ 197, national productivity commission, subcommittee on “intéressement” of personnel, March 1955; TR 13932, on tax exemptions, 1955–1961. See also Jeune Patron, April 1950; and Schueller documents (1950–1951) in DRT 933.Google Scholar

164. AN TR 13932, report by CGT-FO (Force Ouvrière), January 1960; and a similar critique in Jeune Patron, March 1960.Google Scholar

165. AN DRT 934, “Systèmes de rémunération,” November 1951; 81AJ 69, report of mission to US, “Intégration du travailleur dans l'entreprise,” November–December 1953.Google Scholar

166. Norguet, René, Le progrès social en France: Evolution ou révolution (Paris, 1961), 78, 117; CJP in 1945,Google Scholarquoted in Bernoux, Nouveaux patrons, 48; Jeune Patron, June 1949.Google Scholar

167. Jeune Patron, “Quand sortirons-nous de notre médiocrité?” (July–August 1954) and “L'esprit d'entreprise en France d'après David S. Landes” (June 1954). The productivity commission translated Landes's, David “French Business and the Businessman” (from Modern France, ed. Earle, Edward M. [1951]) for its files: AN 81AJ 206.Google Scholar

168. AN 81AJ 69, report of mission to US, “Integration du travailleur,” 1953; CGT-FO, “Le probébme de la productivité, les ‘relations humaines”, 1953; other mission reports quoted in Boltanski, Cadres, 98–102. See also Maier, Charles S., “The Politics of Productivity: Foundations of American International Economic Policy after World War II,” in his In Search of Stability, 121–52;Google Scholarand Kuisel, Richard F., Seducing the French: The Dilemma of Americanization (Berkeley, 1993), chap. 4. Kuisel notes (80) that the mission reports were often less than candid summaries of members' views.Google Scholar

169. Lamirand, Rôle social (1954 ed.), xiii–xiv, 242–44, 270–72; Jeune Patron, September–October 1952.Google Scholar

170. AN 4OAS 46, March 29, 1945; Echo (Mines/Metallurgie), May 1948; plus items on the “purge” of the cadres as cited above.Google Scholar

171. AN TR 14483, May 16, 1945; Boltanski, Cadres, 86–88.Google Scholar

172. Lamirand's terms in Rôle social, 77, 264; Boltanski, Cadres, 94–96 (quoting the cadres' federation in August 1945), and 39–40, 86–87 (on the cadres'“malaise”).Google Scholar

173. Descostes and Robert, Syndicalisme cadre, 210–14; Boltanski, Cadres, 166; Bernoux, Nouveaux patrons, 60.Google Scholar

174. CJP in 1949, quoted in Bernoux, Nouveaux patrons, 38; Norguet, Progres social, 55–56, 85.Google Scholar

175. CJP in 1945, quoted in Bernoux, Nouveaux patrons, 39.Google Scholar

176. Chapman, State Capitalism, 9.Google Scholar

177. See Ewald, François, L'Etat providence (Paris, 1986).Google Scholar