Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T14:34:28.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender in the service of Bourgeois Ideology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Thomas C. Holt
Thomas C. Holt
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Responses
Information
International Labor and Working-Class History , Volume 41 , spring 1992 , pp. 29 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc. 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

Portions of this work have appeared earlier in The Problem of Freedom: Race, Labor, and Politics in Jamaica and Britain, 1832-1938, published by Johns Hopkins University Press. All rights reserved.

1. Morning Journal, 17 August 1838.

2. Holt, Thomas C., The Problem of Freedom: Race, Labor, and Politics in Jamaica and Britain,1832–1938 (Baltimore, 1991), 78Google Scholar.

3. For a discussion of these developments, see ibid., chaps. 2 and 5.

4. Ibid., chap. 5. See also Clarke, Edith, My Mother Who Fathered Me: A Study of the Family in Three Selected Communities in Jamaica (London, 1957), 65–78Google Scholar.

5. Besson, Jean, “Family Land as a Model for Martha Brae's New History: Culture Building in an Afro-Caribbean Village,” in Afro-Caribbean Villages in Historical Perspective, ed. Carnegie, Charles V. (Kingston, 1987), 100–132, quote on 104Google Scholar.

6. There was a glaring contradiction between this part of bourgeois ideology and the actual needs of the estates because slave women had constituted a large part of the plantation labor force. Thus their withdrawal into bourgeois domesticity was fiercely resisted and ridiculed by the planters.

7. Eyre, to Cardwell, , 6 August 1864, no. 234, Colonial Office 137/384, Public Record Office, Kew, EnglandGoogle Scholar.

8. Hill, to Smith, Lionel, 8 January 1837, in Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers, 1837 (521–I), 53:268–69Google Scholar.

9. See Drescher, Seymour, Capitalism and Antislavery: British Mobilization in Comparative Perspective (New York, 1986), chaps. 2 and 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. Hansard, 3rd Ser., House of Lords, (13 March 1866), 181:131, 133.