Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:00:39.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between primary metabolites in reproductive structures of cowpea Vigna unguiculata (Fabaceae: Papilionidae) cultivars and field resistance to the flower bud thrips Megalurothrips sjostedti (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

O.Y. Alabi ,
J.A. Odebiyi  and
M. Tamò
O.Y. Alabi*
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Oyo Road PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
J.A. Odebiyi
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, Entomology Unit, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
M. Tamò
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Biological Control Centre for Africa, Cotonou, Bénin, South Africa
*
*E-mail: T.Alabi@cgiar.org m.tamo@cgiar.org
Get access

Abstract

Preliminary screening of germplasm from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) showed that a number of cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L). Walp. cultivars have potential for resistance to the flower bud thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti (Trybom). In an earlier study, 10 cultivars from this germplasm were selected and the mechanisms of resistance determined. Therefore, in this study, the basis of resistance operating in the cultivars was elucidated during the first and second planting seasons of 1998. Cowpea cultivars were analysed for primary metabolites (total protein content and glucose contents) to study their relationship with resistance parameters of M. sjostedti under field conditions. Total protein and glucose contents varied significantly (P<0.01) in floral buds and flowers of the different cultivars, while in racemes there were little or no significant differences. Highly significant negative correlation coefficients were obtained between total protein contents in reproductive structures and resistance parameters, especially during the second season, regardless of cowpea cultivar, indicating that quality of total protein content plays a significant role in cowpea resistance to M. sjostedti. Significant (P<0.05) correlation between damage indices and glucose content in Vita 7 and Kpodjiguegue is responsible for their susceptibility to M. sjostedti damage. Furthermore, presence of a unique protein band (20.1 kDa) in Moussa local, Sanzibanili and Sewe cultivars could be associated with resistance to flower bud thrips, regardless of quantity of total protein content in these and other test cultivars. Similarly, the specific band just above the 94 kDa in Vita 7 could be responsible for its susceptibility to M. sjostedti.

Keywords

Megalurothrips sjostedtiVigna unguiculatatotal proteinglucose contentreproductive structuresresistance
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 8 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alabi, O. Y., Odebiyi, J. A., Tamò, M. (2004) Effect of host plant resistance in some cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) cultivars on growth and developmental parameters of the flower bud thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti (Trybom). Crop Protection 23, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ananthakrishnan, T. N. (1993) Bionomics of thrips. Annual Review of Entomology 38, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S. O. (1985) Sclerotization and tanning of the cuticle, pp. 59–74. In Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol.3. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bernays, E. A. and Woodhead, S. (1984) The need for high levels of phenylalanine in the diet of Schistocerca gregaria nymphs. Journal of Insect Physiology 30, 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, F. A. (1975) Cowpea in Nigeria, pp. 151–158. In Nutritional Improvement of Food Legumes by Breeding. Proceedings of a Symposium for the United Nations Proteins Advisory Group (Edited by Miller, M.), 3–5 July 1972, New York.Google Scholar
Dubois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A. and Smith, F. (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry 28, 350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gornal, A. G., Bandawill, C. J. and David, M. M. (1949) Determination of serum proteins by means of the Biuret reaction. Journal of Biological Chemistry 177, 751–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N. and Daoust, R. A. (1986) Insect pests of cowpea. Annual Review of Entomology 31, 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N. and Singh, S. R. (1988) Screening techniques for host plant resistance to cowpea insect pests. Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin 35, 2–18.Google Scholar
Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 277, 680–685.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. and Taylor, L. R. (1967) Introduction to Experimental Ecology. Academic Press, London. 401 pp.Google Scholar
Machuka, J. and Okeola, G. O. (2000) One- and two- dimensional gel electrophoresic identification of African yam bean seed proteins. Journal of Agriculture Food and Chemistry 48, 2296–2299.Google Scholar
McNeill, S., Southwood, T. R. E. (1978) The role of nitrogen in the development of insect/plant relationships, pp. 77–78. In Biochemical Aspects of Plant and Animal Coevolution. Proceedings of the Phytochemical Society (Edited by Harborne, J. B.). Academic Press, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
Olatunde, G. O. and Odebiyi, J. A. (1991) The relationship between total sugar, crude protein and tannic acid contents of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata L. Walp. and varietal resistance to Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stal. (Hemiptera: Coreidae). International Journal of Pest Management 37, 393–396.Google Scholar
Omitogun, O.G., Jackai, L.E.N. and Thottappilly, G. (1999) Isolation of insecticidal lectin-enriched extracts from African yam bean. (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) and other legume species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 90, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purseglove, J. W. (1968) Tropical Crops Dicotyledons I. John Wiley and Sons, New York 719 pp.Google Scholar
Quin, F. M. (1997) Introduction, pp. ix–xv. In Advances in Cowpea Research (Edited by Singh, B. B., Raj Mohan, D. R., Dashiell, K. E. and Jackai, L. E. N.). International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Science (JIRCAS), Nigeria.Google Scholar
Saxena, K. N. (1985) Behavioural basis of plant susceptibility to insects. Insect Science and Its Application 6, 303–313.Google Scholar
Singh, S. R. and Allen, D. J. (1980) Pests, diseases, resistance and protection in cowpea, pp. 419–443. In Advances in Legume Science (Edited by, Summerfield, R. J. and Bunting, A. H.) Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London.Google Scholar
Singh, S. R. and Taylor, T. A. (1978) Pests of grain legumes and their control in Nigeria, pp. 99–111. In Pests of Grain Legumes: Ecology and Control (Edited by Singh, S. R., van Emden, H. F., Taylor, T. A.). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Smith, C. M., Khan, Z. R. and Pathak, M. D. (Eds) (1994) Techniques for Evaluating Insect Resistance in Crop Plants. CRC/Lewis Press. Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
Tamo`, M., Ekesi, S., Maniania, N. K. and Cherry, A. (2003) Biological control, a non-obvious component of integrated pest management for cowpea, pp. 295–309. In Biological Control in Integrated Pest Management Systems in Africa (Edited by Neuenschwander, P., Borgemeister, C., Langewald, J.) Oxon CABI Publishing, Wallingford.Google Scholar