Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T23:30:15.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predicting Emergence and Flight Activity of Peach Twig Borer (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) by Heat Unit Accumulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

T. R. Ahmad
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture and Biology, P.O. Box 765, Baghdad, Iraq
Get access

Abstract

Pheromone traps were used for monitoring flight activity of peach twig borer, Anarsia lineatella (Zeller), during a 3 year period between 1983–1985 in Iraq at Tarmiya and Madain regions, and cumulative emergence was related to physiological time (degree-days, DDs). Data of moth catches indicated the presence of two generations per year and perhaps a partial third generation. Flight in both regions peaked from April to mid-May and from early June to mid-June. First capture of peach twig male ranged from 16 to 29 March and corresponded to a mean DD accumulation from 1 March of 138 in Tarmiya and 127 in Madain. Such results are very important for managing this pest.

Résumé

Un piège de pheromone a été utilisee pendant 3 ans (de 1983 a 1985) pour controler l'activite de vol du ver de peche, Anarsia lineatella (Zeller), en Iraq a Tarmiah et a Madain, et le cumulatif emergence ayant rapport avec le temps physiologique. Les resultats de capturer des mits a prouves l'existance de deux génération par an et peut etre une troixieme. L'activite maximale de cet insecte est remarquee dans les 2 regions pendant la periode de debut davril a mimai et du debut de Juin a mi-Juin successivement. La promiere capture de maie ver de la peche a été le 16 Mars Jusqua le 29 Mars et cette date correspond an moyen de temps physiologique a la Tarmiya 138 a la Madain 127. Ces resultats sont tres importante du point vue de la lutte contre ce peste.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmad, T. R. and Khadhum, A. A. (1986) Influence of pheromone trap design and placement on capture of peach twig borer, Anarsia lineatella (Zeller). Insect Sci. Applic. 7, 637640.Google Scholar
Allen, J. C. (1976) A modified sine wave method for calculating degree days. Environ. Ent. 5, 388396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthon, E., Smith, L. and Garrett, S. (1971) Artificial diet and pheromone studies with peach twig borer. J. econ. Ent. 64, 259262.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. F. (1948) The peach twig borer. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 708.Google Scholar
Brunner, J. F. and Rice, R. E. (1984) Peach Twig Borer, Anarsia lineatella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), Development in Washington and California. Environ. Ent. 13, 607610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziano, V. and Viggiani, G. (1981) Osservazioni quadriennali Sui voli e Sul controllo di Cydia molesta (Busck) e di Anarsia lineatella (Zell.) in pescheti campani, con l'ausilio di trap-pole a feromone sessuale di sintesi. Annali deua facolta di sci. Agraria deua unversita degti studi di Napoli, portici. 15, 93110.Google Scholar
Jones, L. S. (1935) Observation on the habitats and seasonal life history of Anarsia lineatella in California. J. econ. Ent. 28, 10021011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khairi, I. M., Abdallah, M. K. and Humadi, A. H. (1977) The biology and control of peach worm Anarsia lineatella. Yearbk. plant prot. Res. 1, 48 (In Arabic).Google Scholar
Khairi, I. M., Ahmad, T. R. and Abdallah, M. K. (1982) Chemical control of Anarsia lineatella Zell. (Lep: Gelechiidae). Yearbk. plant prot. Res. 2, 127130 (In Arabic).Google Scholar
Rice, R. E. and Jones, R. A. (1975) Peach twig borer: Field use of a synthetic sex pheromone. J. econ. Ent. 68, 358360.Google Scholar
Roelofs, W., Kochansky, J., Anthons, E., Rice, R. E. and Card, R. (1975) Sex pheromone of peach twig borer moth Anarsia lineatella. Environ. Ent. 4, 580582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar